Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The paper examines the conventional belief that angled holes are more detection effective than vertical holes with dipping targets. The examination uses a binomial probability framework. Analysis in two and three dimensions shows that all holes can be evaluated for detection effectiveness in three dimensions but only standard vertical holes can be in two dimensions. A programme of standard vertical holes using its two-dimensional advantage had a higher detection capability than one of standard angled holes irrespective of the target's orientation. Although this outcome is at odds with the conventional model, the paper shows that the conventional model contains fundamental flaws. It identifies their source and explains why they occurred. These flaws together with evidence provided by the binomial model lead the paper to conclude that the conventional belief cannot be sustained. The financial implications of this conclusion for the industry are significant.

Keywords

ANGLED AND VERTICAL DRILLING DIMENSIONAL PROBABILITY BINOMIAL PROBABILITY MINERAL EXPLORATION EXPLORATION MODELLING DRILLING COST EFFECTIVENESS OROGENIC GOLD DRILLING UNCERTAINTY DRILLING TARGETS DRILLING FOR MINERALS

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Breaster

and Barak

: ‘Searching for a fracture in a two person zero sum game’, Physica A, 1991, 175A, (1), 1–8.

de Geoffroy

J. D.

and Wignall

T. K.

: ‘Designing optimal strategies for mineral exploration’, 32–34; 1985, New York, Plenum Press.

Drew

L. J.

: ‘Pattern drilling exploration: optimum pattern types and hole spacing when searching for elliptical shaped targets’, Math. Geol., 1979, 11, (2), 223–254.

Ellis

R. M.

and Blackwell

J. H.

: ‘Optimum prospecting plans in mining exploration’, Geophysics, 1959, 14, (2), 344–358.

Krumbein

W. C.

and Graybill

F. A.

: ‘An introduction to statistical models in geology’, 77; 1965, New York, McGraw-Hill.

Lerche

: ‘A note on the optimization of deviated well drilling angles’, Energy Explor. Exploit., 2000, 18, (5), 573–577.

McCammon

R. B.

: ‘Target intersection probabilities for parallelline and continuous-grid types of search’, Math. Geol., 1977, 9, (4), 369–382.

Selkirk

: ‘Longman mathematics handbook’, 254; 1990, London, Longman.

Shurygin

A. M.

: ‘The probability of finding deposits and some optimal search grids’, Math. Geol., 1976, 8, (3), 323–330.

10.

Singer

D. A.

and Drew

J. D.

: ‘The area of influence of an exploratory hole’, Econ. Geol., 1976, 71, 642–647.

11.

Singer

D. A.

and Wickman

F. E.

: ‘Probability tables for locating elliptical targets with square, rectangular and hexagonal point nets’, Special publication no. 1-69; 1969, University Park, PA, Pennsylvania State University.

12.

Srivastva

R. M.

: ‘Probabilistic modeling of ore lens geometry: an alternative to the wireframe’, Math. Geol., 2005, 37, (5), 513–544.

13.

Wadsworth

H. M.

: ‘Handbook of statistical methods for scientists and engineers’, Section 4.4.2; 1998, New York, McGraw-Hill.

14.

Wellmer

F.-W.

: ‘Statistical evaluations in exploration for mineral deposits’; 1998, New York, Springer-Verlag.

15.

Wignall

T. K.

and de Geoffroy

: ‘Statistical models for optimizing mineral exploration’, 33–34; 1987, New York, Plenum Press.

16.

Wilson

E. B.

, 1cJr: ‘An introduction to scientific research’, 282; 1952, New York, McGraw-Hill.

Detection effectiveness of angled versus vertical drilling

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References