Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper investigated the bioleaching of different copper sulphide minerals. The bioleaching experiments show that the order of the copper bioleaching rates of four copper sulphide minerals, regardess of whether the optimum conditions or the initial ferrous iron concentration of 0 g L^− 1, was identical: djurleite> bornite> covellite> chalcopyrite. Properties of mineral, such as rest potential, lattice energy, conductivity type and solubility product constant, are the intrinsic factors influencing the bioleaching of minerals. Among these parameters, rest potential and lattice energy can explain the difference of the bioleaching of four copper sulphide minerals. Conductivity type can interpret the low copper leaching efficiency of chalcopyrite and covellite. However, it cannot explicate the high copper leach rate of djurleite and bornite. The decrease of the lag phase of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans with an increase of solubility product constant of minerals is observed in the bioleaching system of four copper sulphide minerals. However, solubility product constant is not the crucial parameters dominating the bioleaching efficiency of copper sulfide minerals.

Keywords

Bioleaching Sulphide copper recovery Physicochemical property Rest potential Lattice energy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Watling,

H. R.

2006. The bioleaching of sulphide minerals with emphasis on copper sulphides–a review, Hydrometallurgy, 84, (1–2), 81–108. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2006.05.001

Dew,

D. W.

, Van,

B. C.

, Mcewan,

and Bowker,

1999. Bioleaching of base metal sulphide concentrates: a comparison of mesophile and thermopile bacterial cultures, in Biohydrometallurgy and environment toward the mining of 21st century, parts A, (eds. Amils

and Ballester

., 229–238, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Elsevier.

Wu,

A. X.

, Wang,

H. J.

, Xi,

and Li,

H. X.

2005. Thermodynamics and electrochemistry analysis of copper mineral leaching, Hydrometallurgy Chin., 24, (4), 192–198.

Bosecker,

1997. Bioleaching: metal solubilization by microorganisms, FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 20, (3–4), 591–604. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00340.x

Deveci,

, Akcil,

and Alp,

2003. Parameters for control and optimisation of bioleaching of sulphide minerals, in Materials Science and Technology 2003 Symposium: Process Control and Optimization in Ferrous and Non Ferrous Industry, (eds. Kongoli

, Thomas

and Sawamiphakdi

., 77–90, Warrendale, PA, TMS.

Norris,

P. R.

, Davis-Belmar,

C. S.

, Nicolle,

, Le,

, Calvo-Bado,

and Angelatou,

2010. Pyrite oxidation and copper sulfide ore leaching by halotolerant, thermotolerant bacteria, Hydrometallurgy, 104, (3–4), 432–436. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2010.03.025

Acevedo,

and Gentina,

J. C.

1989. Process engineering aspects of the bioleaching of copper ores, Bioprocess. Eng., 4, (5), 223–229. doi: 10.1007/BF00369176

Das,

, Ayyappan,

and Chaudhury,

G. R.

1999. Factors affecting bioleaching kinetics of sulfide ores using acidophilic microorganisms, BioMetals, 12, (1), 1–10. doi: 10.1023/A:1009228210654

Bailey,

A. D.

and Hansford,

G. S.

1993. Factors affecting bio-oxidation of sulfide minerals at high concentration of solids: a review, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 42, (10), 1164–1174. doi: 10.1002/bit.260421006

10.

Fu,

K. B.

, Lin,

, Mo,

X. L.

, Dong,

Y. B.

and Zhou,

2011. Study on bioleaching of different types of chalcopyrites, J. Univ. Sci. Technol. Beijing, 33, (7), 806–811.

11.

Fu,

K. B.

, Lin,

, Luo,

D. Q.

, Jiang,

W. F.

and Zeng,

. 2014. Comparsion of bioleaching of copper sulphides by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, Afr. J. Biotechnol., 13, (5), 664–672. doi: 10.5897/AJB2013.13023

12.

Hiroyoshi,

, Miki,

, Hirajima,

and Tsunekawa,

2000. A model for ferrous-promoted chalcopyrite leaching, Hydrometallurgy, 57, (1), 31–38. doi: 10.1016/S0304-386X(00)00089-X

13.

Fu,

K. B.

, Lin,

, Cheng,

, Mo,

X. L.

and Dong,

Y. B.

2013. Bioleaching of djurleite using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, Miner. Eng., 40, 38–41. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2012.09.018

14.

Bevilaqua,

, Garcia,

J. D.

and Tuovinen,

O. H.

2010. Oxidative dissolution of bornite by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, Process Biochem., 45, (1), 101–106. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2009.08.013

15.

Falco,

, Pogliani,

, Curutchet,

and Donati,

2003. A comparison of bioleaching of covellite using pure cultures of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans or a mixed culture of Leptospirillum ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans, Hydrometallurgy, 71, (1–2), 31–36. doi: 10.1016/S0304-386X(03)00170-1

16.

Wells,

A. F.

1986. Structural inorganic chemistry, 5th edn; Oxford, OUPress.

17.

Shuey,

R. T.

1975. Semiconducting ore minerals, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.

18.

Kratz,

and Fuess,

1989. Simultane strukturbestimmung von kupferkies und bornit an einem kristall, Zeitschrift für Kristallographie, 186, 167–169.

19.

Li,

Z. Q.

1984. Lattice energy applied in the process mineralogy, Hunan Met., (2), 13–18.

20.

Torma,

A. E.

and Sakaguchi,

1978. Relation between the solubility product and the rate of metal sulfide oxidation by Thiobacillus ferroxidans, J. Ferment. Bioeng., 56, (3), 173–178.

21.

Rossi,

1990. Biohydrometallurgy, Hanburg, McGraw-Hill.

Bioleaching of different copper sulphide minerals and their physicochemical properties dependence

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References