Abstract
Centrifugal concentrators such as Knelson concentrators (KCs) are commonly used in most gold processing plants to recover fine liberated gold particles. The decision to employ a gravity recovery circuit is primarily based on the amount of gravity recoverable gold (GRG) in the ore among other considerations. However, the conditions required to optimise the gold recovery in such devices used in plants cannot be determined by GRG test results as the separation of particles is based on the particle bed dynamics within the given unit which are different to those encountered in a three inch KC used for the GRG test. The significant operating variables that affect the performance of a KC are the size distributions of the gold and gangue, rotational speed of the bowl, fluidising water flowrate and the cycle time. Of these variables, the rotational speed is generally fixed, and the size distributions of the gold and gangue are determined by the comminution circuit employed. Thus, the fluidising water is the key variable that can be used to control the dilation of the particle bed to maximise the recovery of gold. This paper examines the validity of the GRG test for performance evaluation and discusses an alternative method based on performance curve of the device that can be used to evaluate the optimum fluidising water flowrate of an operating machine. The principles of determining the performance curve of the machine and its use are also discussed and illustrated with laboratory and plant data.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
