The petrographic characteristics of mud supported limestone samples from Egypt were examined before and after calcination at 950°C for 0·25, 0·5, 1 and 2 h. X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), transmitted light microscopy (TLM), scanning electron micro- scopy (SEM) and X-ray microcomputed tomography (μ-CT) were used for technological samples characterisation. Both the free lime content and the hydration behaviour of the resulted quicklime after calcination were measured. The produced lime is unreactive at all applied firing conditions, except the Chalk lime at 1 and 2 h soaking, despite the high free lime content of the samples. The microstructure of the mud supported limestones is of significance on the resulted quicklime reactivity, where microfractures are formed along the cavities inside the microfossils. The mineralogical and the chemical compositions of the studied mud supported limestones are the main controlling variables on the degree of the quicklime crystallinity and consequently the reactivity. Samples enriched with P2O5 show higher crystallinity of the resulted lime crystallites associated with lowest reactivity.
Abu-zeidMM, Sharaf El-DinAM, SerryMA, SoltanA. M2008. Relative importance and impact of the petrographic components of some Egyptian limestones on quicklime production, Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on ‘Geology of the Tethys’, Aswan, Egypt, January, South Valley University, 233–250.
2.
ASTM Standard C25-06. 2006. Standard test methods for chemical analysis of limestone, quicklime and hydrated lime, ASTM international, West Conshohocken, PA.
3.
AwadGH, GhobrialMG. 1965. Zonal stratigraphy of the Kharga Oasis, Egypt, Geol. Surv. Egypt, Paper 34, 77p.
4.
BoukharyM, AbdelmalikW. 1983. Revision of the stratigraphy of the Eocene deposits of Egypt, N. Jb. Geol. Paleont. Mb, (6), 321–337.
5.
BoyntonR. 1988. The chemistry and technology of lime and limestone, 2nd edn; New York, Wiley.
6.
CnuddeV, CwirzenA, MasschaeleB, JacobsP. 2009. Porosity and microstructure characterization of building stones and concretes, Eng. Geol., 103, 76–83.
7.
de GraefB, CnuddeV, DickJ, de BelieN, JacobsP, VerstraeteW. 2005. A sensitivity study for the visualisation of bacterial weathering of concrete and stone with computerised X-ray microtomography (CT), Sci. Total Environ., 341, (1–3), 173–183.
8.
DunhamRJ. 1962. Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture, AAPG Mem., 1, 108–121, 7 Pls., Tulsa.
9.
FlügelE. 2004. Microfabric of carbonate rocks: analysis, interpretation and applications, 921; Berlin/Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.
GheevarheseO, StrydomCA, PotgieterJH, PotgieterSS. 2002. The influence of chloride and sulphate ions on the slaking rate of lime derived from different limestone deposits in South Africa, Water SA, 28, (1), 45–48.
13.
HartmanM, TrnkaO, VeselyV, SvobodaK1996. Predicting the rate of thermal decomposition of dolomite, Chem. Eng. Sci., 51, 5229–5232.
14.
IoannisB, GeorgeL, AlexanderP, HeesooL, StamatiosT. 2011. Physico-chemical properties of different carbonate rocks: are they highly enough to control lime reactivity?, Inter. J. Chem., 3, 2, 187–193.
15.
IssawiB. 1972. Review of upper cretaceous-lower tertiary stratigraphy in central and southern Egypt, AAPG Bull., 56, 1448–1463.
16.
KantiranisN, FilippidisA, ChristarasB, TsirambidesA, Kassoli-FournarakiA. 2003. The role of organic matter of carbonate rocks in the reactivity of the produced quicklime, Mater. Struct., 36, 135–138.
17.
KantiranisN, TsirambidesA, FilippidisA, ChristarasB. 1999. Technological characteristics of the calcined limestone from Agios Panteleimonas, Macedonia, Greece, Mater. Struct., 32, 546–551.
18.
LechR. 2006a. Thermal decomposition of limestone. Part 1: Influence of properties on calcinations time, Sil. Ind., 71, (7–8), 103–109.
19.
LechR. 2006b. Thermal decomposition of limestone. Part 2: Influence of contraction, phase concentrations and heating on calcinations time, Sil. Ind., 71, (7–8), 110–114.
20.
LechR. 2006 c. Thermal decomposition of limestone. Part 3: Kinetic curves, Sil. Ind., 71, (9), 143–148.
21.
LechR. 2007. Thermal decomposition of limestone. Part 4: Permeability of product layer, Sil. Ind., 72, (7–8), 110–114.
22.
LechR, WodrickaK, PedzichZ2009a. Effect of limestone fabric on the fabric development in burnt lime (Part 1).ZKG Int., 62, (6/7), 94–101.
23.
LechR, WodrickaK, PedzichZ. 2009b. Effect of limestone fabric on the fabric development in burnt lime (Part 2), ZKG Int., 62, (8), 63–72.
24.
MoropoulouA, BakolasA, AggelakopoulouE. 2001. The effect of limestone characteristics and calcination temperature to the reactivity of the quicklime, Cem. Concr. Res., 31, 633–639.
25.
MoustafaAR. 1988. Wrench tectonics in the north Western Desert of Egypt (Abu Roash area, southwest of Cairo), Earth Sci. Ser., 2, 1–16.
26.
OatesJA. 1998. Lime and Limestone: chemistry and technology, production and uses, 455; Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
27.
PaoloD. 2002. Properties and reactivity of reactivated calcium-based sorbents, Fuel, 81, 763–770.
28.
PotgieterJH, PotgieterSS, de WaalD. 2003. An empirical study of factors influencing lime slaking. Part II: Lime constituents and water composition, Water SA, 29, (2), 157–160.
29.
PotgieterJH, PotgieterSS, MojaSS, Mulaba-BfubiandiA. 2002. The standard reactivity test as a measurement of lime's quality, J. SA Inst. Min. Metall., 102, (1), 67–69.
30.
SerryMA, Abu ZeidMM, El-DinSharafAA, SoltanAM. 2008a. Evaluation of Egyptian limestones for quicklime manufacture. Part 1: Characterization of technological limestone samples for quicklime manufacture, ZKG Int., 5, 68–77.
31.
SerryMA, Abu ZeidMM, El-DinSharafAA, SoltanAM. 2008b. Evaluation of Egyptian limestones for quicklime manufacture. Part 2: Factors influencing rate of active-lime liberation of the technological limestone samples, ZKG Int., 6, 61–71.
32.
SoltanAM. 2008. Optimum petrographic composition and firing conditions for quicklime production, Proc. 28th Cement and Concrete Science Conf., Manchester, UK, September, Manchester University, 28–30.
33.
SoltanAM. 2009a. Petrographic modeling of Egyptian limestones for quicklime production, Arab. J. Geosci., 4, 803–815.
34.
SoltanAM, HazemM. 2009b. Quicklime reactivity as a function of limestone microstructure and firing conditions, Proc. 87th Annual Meet. of the German Mineralogical Society (DMG), Halle, Germany, September, DMG, 238.
35.
SoltanAM, KahlW.-A, HazemMM, WendschuhM, FischerRX2011. Thermal microstructural changes of grain-supported limestones, Mineral. Petrol., Spring.</emph> DOI 10.1007/s00710–011–0151–0.
36.
StanmoreBR, GilotP. 2005. Review – calcination and carbonation of limestone during thermal cycling for CO2 sequestration, Fuel Process. Technol., 86, 1707–1743.
37.
TrikkelA, KuusikR. 2003. Modeling of decomposition and sulphation of oil shale carbonates on the basis of natural limestone, Oil Shale, 20, (4), 491–500.
