Magnetic hybrid photocatalysts containing TiO2 nanotube as outer catalytic layer and Fe3O4 as the core, with an amorphous carbon intermediate layer, were synthesised, characterised and applied to degradation of phenol under Xenon lamp irradiation. For the composite, Fe3O4/C microspheres were surrounded by anatase TiO2 nanotubes with a diameter of ∼8–10 nm. Photocatalytic performance of the Fe3O4/C/TiO2 nanotube (FCT-NT) composites was also evaluated and showed enhanced activity superior to commercial P25 and homemade TiO2 particles. The outstanding photocatalytic performance of FCT-NT sample could be attributed to its improved surface area and enhanced capability of optical absorption. Notably, the novel photocatalyst showed excellent magnetic behaviour and could be efficiently separated and collected from the wastewater.
ZhangG., TengF., ZhaoC., ChenL., ZhangP., WangY., GongC., ZhangZ. and XieE.: ‘Enhanced photocatalytic activity of TiO2/carbon@TiO2 core–shell nanocomposite prepared by two-step hydrothermal method’, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2014, 311, 384–390. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.072
4.
DolatD., MoziaS., WróbelR. J., MoszyńskiD., OhtaniB., GuskosN. and MorawskiA. W.: ‘Nitrogen-doped, metal-modified rutile titanium dioxide as photocatalysts for water remediation’, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 162, 310–318. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.07.001
5.
LiuJ., ZhangQ., YangJ., MaH., TadeM. O., WangS. and LiuJ.: ‘Facile synthesis of carbon-doped mesoporous anatase TiO2 for the enhanced visible-light driven photocatalysis’, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, (90), 13971–13974. doi: 10.1039/C4CC05544F
6.
AsahiR., MorikawaT., OhwakiT., AokiK. and TagaY.: ‘Visible-light photocatalysis in nitrogen-doped titanium oxides’, Science, 2001, 293, (5528), 269–271. doi: 10.1126/science.1061051
7.
ButbureeT., BaiY., PanJ., ZongX., SunC., LiuG. and WangL.: ‘Step-wise controlled growth of metal@TiO2 core–shells with plasmonic hot spots and their photocatalytic properties’, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2A, (32), 12776–12784. doi: 10.1039/C4TA01120A
8.
TianB., DongR., ZhangJ., BaoS., YangF. and ZhangJ.: ‘Sandwich-structured AgCl@Ag@TiO2 with excellent visible-light photocatalytic activity for organic pollutant degradation and E. coli K12 inactivation’, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 158–159, 76–84. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.04.008
9.
TianX., LiS., CaoY., XuY. and ZhangG.: ‘Preparation, optical property, and photocatalytic activity of cubic Cu2O/amorphous TiO2 and spheric CuO/TiO2 core–shell nanocomposites’, Mater. Lett., 2014, 131, 86–89. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.05.127
10.
AthaudaT. J., NeffJ. G., SutherlinL., ButtU. and OzerR. R.: ‘Systematic study of the structure–property relationships of branched hierarchical TiO2/ZnO nanostructures’, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2012, 4, (12), 6917–6926. doi: 10.1021/am302061z
11.
WengB., LiuS., TangZ. -R. and XuY. -J.: ‘One-dimensional nanostructure based materials for versatile photocatalytic applications’, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, (25), 12685–12770. doi: 10.1039/c3ra47910b
12.
ChenX. and MaoS. S.: ‘Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications’, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, (7), 2891–2959. doi: 10.1021/cr0500535
13.
YangH. G., SunC. H., QiaoS. Z., ZouJ., LiuG., SmithS. C., ChengH. M. and LuG. Q.: ‘Anatase TiO2 single crystals with a large percentage of reactive facets’, Nature, 2008, 453, (7195), 638–641. doi: 10.1038/nature06964
14.
CargnelloM., GordonT. R. and MurrayC. B.: ‘Solution-phase synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles and nanocrystals’, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, (19), 9319–9345. doi: 10.1021/cr500170p
15.
KasugaT., HiramatsuM., HosonA., SekinoT. and NiiharaK.: ‘Formation of titanium oxide nanotube’, Langmuir, 1998, 14, (12), 3160–3163. doi: 10.1021/la9713816
16.
KasugaT., HiramatsuM., HosonA., SekinoT. and NiiharaK.: ‘Titania nanotubes prepared by chemical processing’, Adv. Mater., 1999, 11, (15), 1307–1311. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199910)11:15<1307::AID-ADMA1307>3.0.CO;2-H
17.
ZhuY., LiH., KoltypinY., HacohenY. R. and GedankenA.: ‘Sonochemical synthesis of titania whiskers and nanotubes’, Chem. Commun., 2001, (24), 2616–2617. doi: 10.1039/b108968b
18.
YuJ., DaiG. and ChengB.: ‘Effect of crystallization methods on morphology and photocatalytic activity of anodized TiO2 nanotube array films’, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114, (45), 19378–19385. doi: 10.1021/jp106324x
19.
XueC., NarushimaT., IshidaY., TokunagaT. and YonezawaT.: ‘Double-wall TiO2 nanotube arrays: enhanced photocatalytic activity and in situ TEM observations at high temperature’, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, (22), 19924–19932. doi: 10.1021/am505333v
20.
YanJ. and ZhouF.: ‘TiO2 nanotubes: structure optimization for solar cells’, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, (26), 9406–9418. doi: 10.1039/c1jm10274e
21.
BavykinD. V., CarravettaM., KulakA. N. and WalshF. C.: ‘Application of magic-angle spinning NMR to examine the nature of protons in titanate nanotubes’, Chem. Mater., 2010, 22, (8), 2458–2465. doi: 10.1021/cm903100a
22.
ZhangX., ThavasiV., MhaisalkarS. G. and RamakrishnaS.: ‘Novel hollow mesoporous 1D TiO2 nanofibers as photovoltaic and photocatalytic materials’, Nanoscale, 2012, 4, (5), 1707–1716. doi: 10.1039/c2nr11251e
23.
LavanyaT., SatheeshK., DuttaM., Victor JayaN. and FukataN.: ‘Superior photocatalytic performance of reduced graphene oxide wrapped electrospun anatase mesoporous TiO2 nanofibers’, J. Alloys Compd, 2014, 615, 643–650. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.05.088
24.
DuanH. G., XieE. Q., ZhaoJ. G. and JiaC. W.: ‘Preparation and characterisation of ultrafine and uniform TiO2 nanofibres’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2008, 24, (2), 241–244. doi: 10.1179/174328408X270257
25.
WuH. B., HngH. H. and LouX. W.: ‘Direct synthesis of anatase TiO2 nanowires with enhanced photocatalytic activity’, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24, (19), 2567–2571. doi: 10.1002/adma.201200564
26.
LamS. -M., SinJ. -C., SatoshiI., AbdullahA. Z. and MohamedA. R.: ‘Enhanced sunlight photocatalytic performance over Nb2O5/ZnO nanorod composites and the mechanism study’, Appl. Catal. A, 2014, 471, 126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2013.12.001
27.
YuH., PanJ., BaiY., ZongX., LiX. and WangL.: ‘Hydrothermal synthesis of a crystalline rutile TiO2 nanorod based network for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells’, Chemistry, 2013, 19, (40), 13569–13574. doi: 10.1002/chem.201300999
28.
HeX., CaiY., ZhangH. and LiangC.: ‘Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants with Ag decorated free-standing TiO2 nanotube arrays and interface electrochemical response’, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, (2), 475–480. doi: 10.1039/C0JM02404J
29.
FengS., WuJ., HuP., ChenY., MaB., PengJ., YangJ. and JiangH.: ‘Epitaxial growth of successive CdSe ultrathin films and quantum dot layers on TiO2 nanorod arrays for photo-electrochemical cells’, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, (24), 12154–12159. doi: 10.1039/c3ra47404f
30.
KongkanandA., TvrdyK., TakechiK., KunoM. and KamatP. V.: ‘Quantum dot solar cells. Tuning photoresponse through size and shape control of CdSe − TiO2 architecture’, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, (12), 4007–4015. doi: 10.1021/ja0782706
31.
PagliaroM., PalmisanoG., CiriminnaR. and LoddoV.: ‘Nanochemistry aspects of titania in dye-sensitized solar cells’, Energy Environ. Sci., 2009, 2, (8), 838–844. doi: 10.1039/b903030a
32.
WangN., SunC., ZhaoY., ZhouS., ChenP. and JiangL.: ‘Fabrication of three-dimensional ZnO/TiO2 heteroarchitectures via a solution process’, J. Mater. Chem., 2008, 18, (33), 3909–3911. doi: 10.1039/b809385g
33.
XingZ., ZhouW., DuF., ZhangL., LiZ., ZhangH. and LiW.: ‘Facile synthesis of hierarchical porous TiO2 ceramics with enhanced photocatalytic performance for micropolluted pesticide degradation’, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, (19), 16653–16660. doi: 10.1021/am5034236
34.
GoeiR. and LimT. T.: ‘Ag-decorated TiO2 photocatalytic membrane with hierarchical architecture: photocatalytic and anti-bacterial activities’, Water Res., 2014, 59, 207–218. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.04.025
35.
SuJ., ZhangY., XuS., WangS., DingH., PanS., WangG., LiG. and ZhaoH.: ‘Highly efficient and recyclable triple-shelled Ag@Fe3O4@SiO2@TiO2 photocatalysts for degradation of organic pollutants and reduction of hexavalent chromium ions’, Nanoscale, 2014, 6, (10), 5181–5192. doi: 10.1039/c4nr00534a
36.
LiW., DengY., WuZ., QianX., YangJ., WangY., GuD., ZhangF., TuB. and ZhaoD.: ‘Hydrothermal etching assisted crystallization: a facile route to functional yolk-shell titanate microspheres with ultrathin nanosheets-assembled double shells’, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, (40), 15830–15833. doi: 10.1021/ja2055287
ColomboM., Carregal-RomeroS., CasulaM. F., GutierrezL., MoralesM. P., BohmI. B., HeverhagenJ. T., ProsperiD. and ParakW. J.: ‘Biological applications of magnetic nanoparticles’, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, (11), 4306–4334. doi: 10.1039/c2cs15337h
39.
Abdel-HalimK. S., BahgatM. and FouadO. A.: ‘Thermal synthesis of nanocrystalline fcc Fe–Ni alloy by gaseous reduction of coprecipitated NiFe2O4 from secondary resources’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2006, 22, (12), 1396–1400. doi: 10.1179/174328406X131019
40.
LiuG., HeF., ZhangJ., LiL., LiF., ChenL. and HuangY.: ‘Yolk–shell structured Fe3O4@C@F-TiO2 microspheres with surface fluorinated as recyclable visible-light driven photocatalysts’, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 150–151, 515–522. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.12.050
41.
QiD., LuJ., DengC. and ZhangX.: ‘Magnetically responsive Fe3O4@C@SnO2 core − shell microspheres: synthesis, characterization and application in phosphoproteomics’, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, (36), 15854–15861. doi: 10.1021/jp902959d
42.
ZhuM. and DiaoG.: ‘Synthesis of porous Fe3O4 nanospheres and its application for the catalytic degradation of xylenol orange’, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, (39), 18923–18934. doi: 10.1021/jp200418j
43.
SunX. and LiY.: ‘Colloidal carbon spheres and their core/shell structures with noble-metal nanoparticles’, Angew. Chem., 2004, 43, (5), 597–601. doi: 10.1002/anie.200352386
44.
ZhuM. and DiaoG.: ‘Magnetically recyclable Pd nanoparticles immobilized on magnetic Fe3O4@C nanocomposites: preparation, characterization, and their catalytic activity toward Suzuki and Heck coupling reactions’, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, (50), 24743–24749. doi: 10.1021/jp206116e
45.
ZhuM., WangC., MengD. and DiaoG.: ‘In situ synthesis of silver nanostructures on magnetic Fe3O4@C core–shell nanocomposites and their application in catalytic reduction reactions’, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1A, (6), 2118–2125. doi: 10.1039/C2TA00669C
46.
ZhangC., SiS. and YangZ.: ‘A highly selective photoelectrochemical biosensor for uric acid based on core-shell Fe3O4@C nanoparticle and molecularly imprinted TiO2’, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2014, 65C, 115–120.
47.
ZhengZ., HuangB., QinX., ZhangX. and DaiY.: ‘Strategic synthesis of hierarchical TiO2 microspheres with enhanced photocatalytic activity’, Chemistry, 2010, 16, (37), 11266–11270. doi: 10.1002/chem.201001280
48.
WangP., WangH., ChenX., LiuY., WengX. and WuZ.: ‘Novel SCR catalyst with superior alkaline resistance performance: enhanced self-protection originated from modifying protonated titanate nanotubes’, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3A, (2), 680–690. doi: 10.1039/C4TA03519D
49.
LopesP. R. M., MontagnolliR. N. and BidoiaE. D.: ‘Analytical methods in photoelectrochemical treatment of phenol’, J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 2011, 22, 1758–1764. doi: 10.1590/S0103-50532011000900019
50.
EatonA. D. and American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Foundation: ‘Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater’, 2005, Washington, DC, American Public Health Association.
51.
ShenL., SongH., CuiH., WenX., WeiX. and WangC.: ‘Fe3O4–carbon nanocomposites via a simple synthesis as anode materials for rechargeable lithium ion batteries’, CrystEngComm, 2013, 15, (46), 9849–9854. doi: 10.1039/c3ce41486h
52.
SathishM., TomaiT. and HonmaI.: ‘Graphene anchored with Fe3O4 nanoparticles as anode for enhanced Li-ion storage’, J. Power Sources, 2012, 217, 85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.05.099
53.
LiS. -K., HuangF. -Z., WangY., ShenY. -H., QiuL. -G., XieA. -J. and XuS. -J.: ‘Magnetic Fe3O4@C@Cu2O composites with bean-like core/shell nanostructures: synthesis, properties and application in recyclable photocatalytic degradation of dye pollutants’, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, (20), 7459–7466. doi: 10.1039/c0jm04569a
54.
LiangD., WuS., WangP., CaiY., TianZ., LiuJ. and LiangC.: ‘Recyclable chestnut-like Fe3O4@C@ZnSnO3 core–shell particles for the photocatalytic degradation of 2,5-dichlorophenol’, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, (50), 26201–26206. doi: 10.1039/c4ra03195d
55.
JinC., WangY., TangH., WeiH., LiuX. and WangJ.: ‘Synthesis, characterization, and catalytic applications of core–shell magnetic carbonaceous nanocomposites’, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, (43), 25110–25117. doi: 10.1021/jp508853a
56.
YaoT., CuiT., WuJ., ChenQ., YinX., CuiF. and SunK.: ‘Preparation of acid-resistant core/shell Fe3O4@C materials and their use as catalyst supports’, Carbon, 2012, 50, (6), 2287–2295. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.01.048
57.
ZhangX. and JiangL.: ‘Fabrication of novel rattle-type magnetic mesoporous carbon microspheres for removal of microcystins’, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, (29), 10653–10657. doi: 10.1039/c1jm12263k
58.
BavykinD. V., ParmonV. N., LapkinA. A. and WalshF. C.: ‘The effect of hydrothermal conditions on the mesoporous structure of TiO2 nanotubes’, J. Mater. Chem., 2004, 14, (22), 3370–3377. doi: 10.1039/b406378c
