Ultrasonic testing is a sensitive tool not only for defect detection and evaluation of components and structures but also to characterise microstructural features which affect mechanical properties. In this study, four different thermally degraded specimens of 2·25Cr–1Mo steel have been prepared by aging at 873 K for 10 h, 923 K for 20 h, 973 K for 40 h and 973K for 80 h to obtain variation in microstructural features. Mechanical properties of each specimen having different microstructures were investigated using tensile and hardness tests. Ultrasonic parameters of each specimen having different microstructural features were studied by pulse echo technique using 5 MHz longitudinal probe. It has been observed that ultrasonic velocity and attenuation both increased with increase in the size of carbide precipitates obtained due to increased time and temperature of aging. Our results indicated that these ultrasonic parameters could be used as a tool to assess the degraded microstructure of operating components in service.
de Araújo FreitasVL, de AlbuquerqueVHC, de Macedo SilvaE, SilvaAA and TavaresJMRS: ‘Nondestructive characterization of microstructures and determination of elastic properties in plain carbon steel using ultrasonic measurements’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, A527, 4431–4437.
2.
de AlbuquerqueVHC, CortezPC, de AlexandriaAR and TavaresJMRS: ‘A new solution for automatic microstructural analysis from images based on a back propagation artificial neural network’, Non-destr. Test. Eval., 2008, 23, 273–283.
3.
de AlbuquerqueVHC, de AlexandriaAR, CortezPC and TavaresJMRS: ‘Hydrogen damage detection by ultrasonic spectral analysis’, NDT & E Int., 2009, 42, 644–651.
4.
RuizA, OrtizN, CarreónH and RubioC: ‘Utilization of ultrasonic measurements for determining the variations in microstructure of thermally Ddegraded 2205 duplex stainless steel’, J Nondestr. Eval., 2009, 28, 131–139.
5.
JayachitraR, MuthupandiV and VijayalakshmiK: ‘Characterization of duplex stainless steel heat – treated at 1300°C’, Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ., 2012, 2, (2), 1–6.
6.
GopichandA, Muralidhara RaoM, SharmaAVNL and TonyVS: ‘Analysis and estimation of attenuation coefficient of aging EN-19 Steel’, J. Eng. Res. Appl., 2012, 2, (1), 590–595.
7.
LevistonD and BridgeB: ‘Evaluation of the subsurface microstructure of quenched and tempered carbon steel by ultrasonic backscatter’, NDT & E Int., 1988, 21, 17–25.
8.
KimSA and JohnsonWL: ‘Elastic constants and internal friction of martensitic steel, ferritic pearlitic steel, and α-iron’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2007, A452–A453, 633–639.
9.
KrügerSE and DammEB: ‘Monitoring austenite decomposition by ultrasonic velocity’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, A425, 238–243.
10.
LamoucheG, BologniniS and KrügerSE: ‘Influence of steel heat treatment on ultrasonic absorption measured by laser ultrasonics’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2004, A370, 401–406.
11.
OhtaniT, NishiyamaK, YoshikawaS, OgiH and HiraoM: ‘Ultrasonic attenuation and microstructural evolution throughout tension–compression fatigue of a low-carbon steel’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, A442, 466–470.
12.
Murav'evVV: ‘Interrelationship of the velocity of an ultrasonic wave in steels and their heat cycles’, Soviet J. Nondestr. Test., 1989, 25, (2), 135–37.
13.
Murav'evVV: ‘Effects of heat treatment on the speed of ultra-sound in aluminum Alloys’, Soviet J. Nondestr. Test., 1989, 25, (11), 832–39.
14.
RosenM, IvesL, BiancanielloF and MehrabianR: ‘Correlation between ultrasonic and hardness measurements in aged aluminum alloy 2024’, Mater. Sci. Eng., 1985, 74, 1–10.
15.
PalanichamyP, JosephA, JayakumarT and RajB: ‘Ultrasonic velocity measurements for estimation of grain Size in austenitic stainless steel’, NDT&E Int., 1995, 28, (3), 179–185.
16.
JayakumarT: ‘Microstructural characterization in metallic materials using ultrasonic and magnetic methods’, PhD thesis, University of Saarland, Germany, 1996.
17.
GenerazioER: ‘Ultrasonic determination of recrystallization’, NASA TM-88855, Lewis Research Centre, Cleveland, OH, USA, 1986.
18.
VasudevanM, PalanichamyP: ‘Characterization of microstructural changes during annealing of cold worked austenitic atainless steel using ultrasonic velocity measurements and correlation with mechanical properties’, JMEPEG, 2002, 11, 169–179.
19.
RajkumarKV, KumarA, VaidyanathanS, JayakumarT, RajB and RayKK: ‘Nondestructive characterization of thermal ageing behaviour at753K in M250 maraging steel’, Proc. Int. Symp. of Research Students on ‘Materials science and engineering’, Chennai, India, December 2004, IIT, 20–22.
20.
StifflerRC, DalyM and WojnarRC: ‘Measurement of the degree of recrystallization in aluminum sheet using horizontally polarized shear waves’, Nondestr. Eval. Mater. Properties II, 1994, 161–170.
21.
Hakan GurC and Orkun TuncerB: ‘Characterization of microstructural phases of steels by sound velocity measurement’, Mater. Char., 2005, 55, 160–166.
22.
KumarA, JayakumarT, RajB and RayKK: ‘Characterization of solutionizing behavior in VT14 titanium alloy using ultrasonic velocity and attenuation measurements’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2003, A360, 58–64.
23.
RajB, ChoudharyBK and Singh RamanRK: ‘Mechanical properties and non-destructive evaluation of chromium–molybdenum ferritic steels for steam generator application’, Int. J. Press. Vess. Pip., 2004, 81, 521–534.
24.
KumarA, ChoudharyBK, LahaK, JayakumarT, Bhanu Sankara RaoK and RajB: ‘Characterization of microstructure in 9%chromium ferritic steels using ultrasonic measurements’, Trans. Indian Inst. Met., 2003, 56, (5), 483–497.
25.
KenawyMA, Abdel FatahAM, OkashaN and El-GazaryM: ‘Ultrasonic measurements and metallurgical properties of ductile cast iron’, Egypt J. Sol., 2001, 24, (2), 133–140.
26.
LarsonFR and MillerJ: A time-temperature relationship for rupture and creep stresses’,Trans. ASME, 1952, 74, 765–775.
27.
StellaJ, CerezoJ and RodriguezE: ‘Characterization of the sensitization degree in the AISI 304 stainless steel using spectral analysis and conventional ultrasonic techniques’, NDT & E Int., 2009, 42, 267–274.
28.
JhaBB, MishraBK, SatpatiB and OjhaSN: ‘Effect of thermal ageing on the evolution of microstructure and degradation of hardness of 2·25Cr-1Mo steel’, Mater. Sci.-Poland, 2010, 28, 335–346.
29.
YangH and KimS: ‘A study on the mechanical strength change of 2·25Cr–1Mo steel by thermal aging’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2001, A319–A321, 316–320.
30.
KluehRL and SwindemanRW: ‘The microstructure and mechanical properties of a modified 2·25Cr-1Mo Steel’, Metall. Trans., 1986, 17A, 1027–1034.
31.
CheruvuNS: ‘Degradation of mechanical properties of Cr-Mo-V and 2·25Cr-1Mo steel components after long-term service at elevated temperatures’, Metall. Trans. A, 1989, 20A, 87–97.
32.
ByeonJW, In KwunS, HongS.-J, LeeC.-K, KangK.-M and SohnY: ‘Correlation of magnetic barkhausen emission profile with strength of thermally degraded 2·25Chromium–1Molybdenum Steel’, Mater. Trans., 2005, 46, (12), 3089–3091.
33.
OrowanE: ‘In Symposium on internal stresses in metals and alloys’, Inst. Met., 1948, 451–453.
