Polycrystalline diamond (PCD) is an extremely high-performance cutting tool material used in the machining of rock, high-strength, non-ferrous metal alloys and carbon-fibre-reinforced composites. It is favoured for its exceptional hardness and wear resistance which results in at least an order of magnitude improvement in performance over previous technologies in almost all metrics. However, PCD suffers from unpredictable brittle fracture and degradation at high temperature during service which limits its capabilities in cutting applications. The literature on the link between its microstructure and its mechanical properties, including strength, toughness and flaw size distribution as measured by pseudo-static tests, is investigated. The conclusions of the seminal paper on this topic are re-examined in the light of modern ceramics research and an alternative explanation is put forth for the strength–grain size relationship published in this paper. All known literature values for strength and toughness vs. grain size and binder content are collated showing no overall trend in strength with binder content but moderate trends in all other combinations. The common claim of weak grain boundaries is brought into question in the light of the lack of any evidence of this fracture mode being evident in pseudo-static tests. The industrial literature on wear testing and failure modes of PCD in service and service-like tests is examined to bridge the gap between pseudo-static and dynamic, application-based experiments. Six main failure modes are recorded and summarised with intergranular fracture being the most conspicuously absent from the pseudo-static tests. It is suggested that the temperature generated by friction in dynamic tests causes the weakening of grain boundaries, resulting in a transition from transgranular to intergranular fracture and a call for further research in this area is made.
CollinsAT.The Hannay diamonds. Ind Diam Rev. 1975;35:434–437.
5.
BundyFP, HallHT, StrongHM, et al. Man-made diamonds. Nature. 1955;175(4471):642–643.
6.
BovenkirkHP, BundyFP, HallHT, et al. Preparation of diamond. Nature. 1959;184(4693):1094–1098.
7.
BadzianAR, KlokockiA.On the catalytic growth of synthetic diamonds. J Cryst Growth. 1981;52:843–847.
8.
HallHT.Sintered diamond: a synthetic carbonado. Science. 1970;169(3948):868–869.
9.
KatzmanH, LibbyWF.Sintered diamond compacts with a cobalt binder. Science. 1971;172(3988):1132–1134.
10.
WentorfRHJr., RoccoWA.Diamond tools for machining. United States patent US 3745623 A. 1973.
11.
PhilbinP, GordonS.Characterisation of the wear behaviour of polycrystalline diamond (PCD) tools when machining wood-based composites. J Mater Process Technol. 2005;162–163:665–672.
12.
WangYG, LuiB, SongJY, et al. Study on the wear mechanism of pcd tools in high-speed milling of Al-Si alloy. Adv Mater Res. 2012;381:16–19.
13.
KimD, BealA, KwonP.Effect of tool wear on hole quality in drilling of carbon fiber reinforced plastic-titanium alloy stacks using tungsten carbide and polycrystalline diamond tools. J Manufact Sci Eng. 2015;138(3):03100603101031006–1 –031006–11.
14.
BellinF, DourfayeA, KingW, et al. The current state of PDC bit technology: Part 1. World Oil. 2010;231(09):41–46.
15.
BellinF, DourfayeA, KingW, et al. The current state of PDC bit technology: Part 3. World Oil. 2010;231(11):67–71.
16.
JahanmirS, RamuluM, KoshyP.Machining of ceramics and composites. Taylor & Francis; 1999. New York: Manuf Eng Mater Process.
17.
ArsecularatneJA, ZhangLC, MontrossC.Wear and tool life of tungsten carbide, PCBN and PCD cutting tools. Int J Mach Tool Manu. 2006;46(5):482–491.
18.
WangDH, WernCW, RamuluM, et al. Cutting edge wear of tungsten carbide tool in continuous and interrupted cutting of a polymer composite. Mater Manu Process. 1995;10(3):493–508.
19.
WalmsleyJC, LangAR.Characteristics of diamond regrowth in a synthetic diamond compact. J Mater Sci. 1988;23(5):1829–1834.
20.
WalmsleyJC, LangAR.Transmission electron microscopic observations of deformation and microtwinning in a synthetic diamond compact. J Mater Sci Lett. 1983;2(12):785–788.
21.
ÖzbayraktarS.PCD Sintering Model. De Beers Industrial Diamond Technical Note. 1997.
22.
WestraadtJE, SigalasI, NeethlingJH.Characterisation of thermally degraded polycrystalline diamond. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater. 2015;48:286–292.
23.
McNamaraD, AlveenP, DammS, et al. A Raman spectroscopy investigation into the influence of thermal treatments on the residual stress of polycrystalline diamond. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater. 2015;52:114–122.
24.
MehanRL, HibbsLE.Thermal degradation of sintered diamond compacts. J Mater Sci. 1989;24:942–950.
25.
BovenkerkH, GiglP.Temperature resistant abrasive compact and method for making same. United States patent US 4,224,380. 1980.
26.
McNamaraD.The mechanical and fracture properties of polycrystalline diamond as a function of microstructure [dissertation]. National University of Ireland; 2015.
27.
LiuC, KouZ, HeD, et al. Effect of removing internal residual metallic phases on wear resistance of polycrystalline diamond compacts. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater. 2012;31:187–191.
28.
LammerA.Mechanical properties of polycrystalline diamonds. Mater Sci Technol. 1988;4(11):949–955.
29.
FieldJE.The mechanical and strength properties of diamond. Rep Prog Phys. 2012;75(12):126505.
30.
GiglPD.High-pressure science and technology, Vol. 1. New York: Plenum Press; 1979.
31.
RobertsDC.Syndite – its mechanical and physical properties. Ind Diam Rev. 1979;39:237–241.
32.
RiceRW.Fracture mechanics of ceramics, Vol. 1. New York: Plenum Press; 1974.
33.
CatledgeSA, VohraYK, LadiR, et al. Micro-Raman stress investigations and X-ray diffraction analysis of poly crystalline diamond (PCD) tools. Diam Rel Mater. 1996;5(10):1159–1165.
34.
MarroFG, MestraA, Jiménez-PiquéE, et al.Damage induced by monotonic and cyclic spherical indentation in polycrystalline diamond (PCD). Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater. 2015;49:292–301.
35.
DevinLN, MaistrenkoAL, SimkinES, et al. Resistance to cracking of hard-metal composite materials. Sov Powder Metall. 1982;21:419–423.
36.
NuiLS, ChehimiC, PluvinageG.Stress field near a large blunted tip v-notch and application of the concept of the critical notch stress intensity factor (nsif) to the fracture toughness of very brittle materials. Eng Fract Mech. 1994;49(3):325–335.
37.
FettT, MunzD.Stress intensity factors and weight functions. Southampton, UK: Computational Mechanics Publications; 1997. (Advances in fracture series).
38.
PetrovicM, IvankovicA, MurphyN.The mechanical properties of polycrystalline diamond as a function of strain rate and temperature. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2012;32(12):3021–3027.
39.
McNamaraD, CarolanD, AlveenP, et al. The influence of microstructure on the fracture statistics of polycrystalline diamond and polycrystalline cubic boron nitride. Ceram Int. 2014;40(8):11543–11549.
40.
MorrellR, DanzerR, SupancicP, et al. Meso-scale mechanical testing methods for diamond composite materials. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater. 2010;28(4):508–515.
41.
BelnapD, GriffoA.Homogeneous and structured PCD/WC-Co materials for drilling. Diam Rel Mater. 2004;13(10):1914–1922.
42.
García-MarroF, MestraA, KanyantaV, et al. Contact damage and residual strength in polycrystalline diamond (PCD). Diam Rel Mater. 2016;65:131–136.
43.
MiessD, RaiG.Fracture toughness and thermal resistance of polycrystalline diamond compacts. Mater Sci Eng A. 1996;209(1–2):270–276.
44.
LinT-P, CooperGA, HoodM.Measurement of the fracture toughness of polycrystalline diamond using the double-torsion test. J Mater Sci. 1994;29:4750–4756.
45.
ShyamA, Lara-CurzioE.The double-torsion testing technique for determination of fracture toughness and slow crack growth behavior of materials: a review. J Mater Sci. 2006;41(13):4093–4104.
46.
TaitRB, FryPR, GarrettGG.Review and evaluation of the double-torsion technique for fracture toughness and fatigue testing of brittle materials. Exp Mech. 1987;27(1):14–22.
47.
PetrovicM, CarolanD, IvankovicA, et al. Role of rate and temperature on fracture and mechanical properties of PCD. Key Eng Mater. 2011;452:153–156.
48.
McNamaraD, AlveenP, CarolanD, et al. Fracture toughness evaluation of polycrystalline diamond as a function of microstructure. Eng Fract Mech. 2015;143:1–16.
49.
TaylorD.Crack modelling: a technique for the fatigue design of components. Eng Fail Anal. 1996;3(2):129–136.
OsburnHJ.Wear of rock cutting tools. Powder Metall. 1969;12(24):471–502.
63.
DunnKJ, LeeM.The fracture and fatigue of sintered diamond compact. J Mater Sci. 1979;14:882–890.
64.
BrettFJ, WarrenTM, BehrSM.Bit whirl – a new theory of PDC bit failure. Soc Petrol Eng. 1990;5(4):275–281.
65.
YahiaouiM, ParisJY, DelbéK, et al. Quality and wear behavior of graded polycrystalline diamond compact cutters. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater. 2016;56:87–95.
66.
DammO, TankK, TomlinsonP.Bearing assembly. EP Patent 0,617,207. 1998.
67.
WestraadtJE, SigalasI, NeethlingJH.Characterisation of thermally degraded polycrystalline diamond. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater. 2015;48:286–292.
68.
PretoriusCJ, SooSL, AspinwallDK, et al. Tool wear behaviour and workpiece surface integrity when turning Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-6Mo with polycrystalline diamond tooling. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol. 2015;64(1):109–112.
69.
SchrockDJ, KangD, BielerTR, et al. Phase dependent tool wear in turning Ti-6Al-4V using polycrystalline diamond and carbide inserts. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2014;136(4):041018.
70.
BaiQS, YaoYX, BexP, et al. Study on wear mechanisms and grain effects of PCD tool in machining laminated flooring. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater. 2004;22(2–3):111–115.
71.
LiY, HanXL, WangXQ.Research on mechanical properties and test methods of polycrystalline diamond. Diam Abrasives Eng. 2001;5:27–30.
