The effect of notch root radius on the mode I fracture toughness of Ti–18Al–8Nb alloy in beta solution treated and water quenched condition was investigated. The apparent fracture toughness KIA was found to be independent of the notch root radius below a critical notch root radius ρ0 and subsequently increase linearly with the square root of notch root radius ρ1/2 beyond ρ0. The critical notch root radius in this alloy was found to be ∼50 μm. The results were explained on the basis of strain controlled fracture model.
SastryS. M. L. and LipsittH. A.: Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Titanium (Titanium ‘80: science and technology’), (ed.KimuraH. and IzumiO.), Vol. 2, 1231-1244; 1980, New York, AIME.
3.
MartinP. L., LipsittH. A., NuhferN. T. and WilliamsJ. C.: Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Titanium (Titanium ‘80: science and technology’), (ed.KimuraH. and IzumiO.), Vol. 2, 1245-1254; 1980, New York, AIME.
4.
GogiaA. K., BanerjeeD. and NandyT. K.: Metall. Trans. A, 1990, 21A, 609–625.
5.
BanerjeeD.: in Intermetallic compounds - principles and practice’, (ed.WestbrookJ. H. and FleisherR. L.), Vol. 2; 1994, London, John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
6.
KimN. J., KimJ. Y. and ChoW. S.: Metall Trans. A, 1993, 24A, 1785–1793.
7.
ChanK. S.: Metall Trans. A, 1990, 21A, 2687–2699.
8.
ChanK. S.: Metall Trans. A, 1992, 23A, 183–199.
9.
ChanK. S. and KimY. W.: Proc. TMS Symp. on ‘Microstructure/ property relationships in titanium aluminides and titanium alloys’, (ed.KimY. W. and BoyerR. R.), 179-196; 1991, Warrendale, PA, TMS.
10.
SoboyejoW. O.: Metall Trans. A, 1992, 23A, 1737–1750.
11.
KamatS. V., GogiaA. K. and BanerjeeD.: Acta. Mater., 1998, 46, 239–251.
12.
WilshawT. R., RauC. A. and TetelmanA. S.: Eng. Fract. Mech., 1968, 1, 191–203.
13.
CroweC. R. and GrayR. A.: in ‘Failure mechanisms in high performance materials’ (Proc. 39th Meeting High Performance Group), 157-166; 1984, Gaithesburg, NIST.
14.
ManoharanM. and LewanandowskiJ.: Int. J. Fract., 1989, 40, R31–R34.
15.
ChipperfieldC. G.and.J. F. Knott: Met. Technol, 1975, 2, 45–51.
16.
KamatS. V. and PrasadN. E.: Scr. Metall Mater., 1991, 25, 1519–1524.
17.
YokoboriT. and KonojuJ.: Eng. Fract. Mech., 1977, 1, 839–847.
18.
KumarA. M., HirthJ. P., HoaglandR. G. and FengX.: J. Test. Eval, 1994, 22, 327–333.
19.
KamatS. V., HirthJ. P. and MehrabianR.: Scr. Metall. Mater., 1989, 23, 523–528.
20.
ParadkarA., KumarV., KamatS. V., GogiaA. K. and KashyapB. P.: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, doi 10.1016/j.smea2007.10.005
21.
ASTM: ‘Annual book of standards’, Vol. 3.01, ASTM E-399; 1997, Philadelphia, PA, ASTM.
22.
ParadkarA. G., KamatS. V., GogiaA. K. and KashyapB. P.: Mater. Sci Eng. A, 2007, A456,292–299.
23.
ParadkarA., KamatS. V., GogiaA. K. and KashyapB. P.: Metall Trans. A, 2007, 39, 551–558.
24.
MalkinJ. and TetelmanA. S.: Eng. Fract. Mech., 1971, 3, 151–167.
