Improving steelmaking and casting processes to adapt to the requirements of internal and external customers involves continuous monitoring and evaluation of existing and development of new steel refining practices. Internal quality control of semifinished products requires tools that can correlate product defects to process anomalies. This article focuses on use of techniques such as measurement of complete steel and slag chemistry, inclusion analysis, process analysis and thermodynamics to assess the influence of process conditions on product properties. Examples from both long and flat products, including low carbon aluminium killed steels, medium carbon aluminium killed steels, advanced high strength steels and free machining steels, are presented to explain the benefit of using these tools to understand the process conditions necessary for clean steelmaking and thus improve product quality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KaushikPH PieletYinH: ‘Inclusion characterization – tool to measure steel cleanliness and process control: Part I’,Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2009, 36, (8), 561–571.
2.
KaushikPPieletHYinH: ‘Inclusion characterization – tool to measure steel cleanliness and process control: Part II’,Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2009, 36, (8), 572–582.
3.
MeillandRDosdatL: ‘Rapid characterization of inclusionary cleanliness in steels by PDA-OES mapping’,Rev. Metall., 2002, 4, 373–382.
4.
‘Automated Steel Cleanliness Assessment Tool (ASCAT): a proprietary software of R J Lee Group’, RJ Lee Group, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
5.
‘Chemical EQuilibrium Calculation for the Steel Industry (CEQCSI): a proprietary software of ArcelorMittal Global R&D’, ArcelorMittal Global R&D, East Chicago, IN, USA.
6.
FaulringGNFarrellJWHiltyDC: ‘Steel flow through nozzles: influence of calcium’, Proc. Conf. ISS EAF, Detroit, MI, USA, December1979, ISS, 219–229.
7.
PistoriusPCPresolyPTshilomboKG: ‘Magnesium: origin and role in calcium-treated inclusions’, Proc. Sohn Int. Symp., San Diego, CA, USA, TMS, the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, August2006, 373–378.
8.
HolappaLHamalainenMLiukkonenMLindM: ‘Thermodynamic examination of inclusion modification and precipitation from calcium treatment to solidified steel’,Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2003, 30, (2), 111–115.
9.
TiekinkW: ‘Basic study on shape control of inclusions by Ca treatment’, in ‘Optimization and evaluation of different secondary metallurgy routes to achieve high-quality strip steel’, European Commission Technical Steel Research Final Report, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2009, 56–74.
10.
TurkdoganET: ‘Metallurgical consequences of calcium retention in liquid and solid steel’, Proc. 1st Int. Calcium Treatment Symp., June1988, The Institute of Metals, London, 3–13.
11.
BasakSDhalRKRoyGG: ‘Efficacy and recovery of calcium during CaSi cored wire injection in steel melts’,Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2010, 37, (3), 161–168.
ItoY.-INaraSKatoYSudaM: ‘Shape control of alumina inclusions by double calcium addition treatment’,Tetsu-to-Hagane, 2007, 93, (5), 15–21.
14.
ShinY.-TSeoJ.-DChoiS.-WLeeJ.-S: ‘Development of inclusion determination method for spring steel by PDA-OES’, Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on ‘Clean steel’, Balatonfured, Hungary, June2007, Hungarian Mining and Metallurgical Society, CD-ROM.
15.
AlavanjaMGassRTKittridgeRWTsaiHT: ‘Continuous improvement of practices to reduce tundish nozzle clogging’, Proc. 78th ISS Steelmaking Conf., Warrendale, PA, USA, March1995, ISS, 415–426.
16.
YinH: ‘Inclusion characterization and thermodynamics for high-Al advanced high strength steels’, Proc. Conf. AISTech05, Charlotte, NC, USA, May2005, AIST, Vol. 2, 89–97.
17.
YinHSkoczylasG: ‘In-situ observations and thermodynamics of the chemical reaction between AlN particles and molten slag’, Proc. Conf. AISTech06, Cleveland, OH, USA, May2006, Vol. 1, 753–760.
18.
AhlborgKC: ‘Relationship between ladle furnace slag oxygen potential and contamination of alumina inclusions by MgO and CaO’, Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on ‘Clean steel’, Balatonfured, Hungary, June1997, Hungarian Mining and Metallurgical Society, 151–156.
19.
GarveyTMTataHJ: ‘Factors affecting the machinability of low carbon free machining steels’, Proc. Mechanical Working of Steel Conf. II, Warrendale, PA, USA, 1965, TMS-AIME, 99.
20.
MarstonGJMurrayJD: ‘Machinability of low carbon free cutting steel’,J. Iron Steel Inst., 1970, 108, 568.
21.
JosephRAYaguchiHBhattacharyaD: ‘The development and characterization of bloom cast, low carbon, resulphurized, free machining steel’, Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on ‘Behavior of materials in machining’, Stratford-upon-Avon, UK, November1988, The Institute of Metals, 13.2–13.3
