Flowsheet development,process simulation and economic feasibility analysis for novel suspension ironmaking technology based on natural gas: Part 1 – Flowsheet and simulation for ironmaking with reformerless natural gas
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2012
Flowsheet development,process simulation and economic feasibility analysis for novel suspension ironmaking technology based on natural gas: Part 1 – Flowsheet and simulation for ironmaking with reformerless natural gas
A novel gas–solid suspension ironmaking process with much less energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions than the current blast furnace technology is under development at the University of Utah. The proposed process is based on flash reduction of iron ore concentrate with a gaseous reagent, such as hydrogen, syngas and/or natural gas. This series of papers reports on the results of process simulation for the proposed process operated with natural gas. This Part 1 deals with simulation of a commercial scale reformerless ironmaking process with heat recovery and hydrogen recycling steps. Ironmaking was simulated in one-step and two-step process configurations. The results indicated that the proposed process would, depending on the process configuration, reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 39–51% and energy consumption by 32–44% compared with the average blast furnace process (61–66% if the lower heating value of natural gas is used). The sensitivity of the energy requirement to operating conditions was also examined.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
US Geological Survey: ‘Iron and steel’, ‘2007 minerals yearbook’, Advanced release, US Department of Interior, USGS, Rolla, MO, USA,April2009, 37.5.
2.
JaffarullahRGhoshBK: ‘Alternate fuels in blast furnace to reduce coke consumption’,J. Metall. Mater. Eng., Apr. 2005, 86, 16.
3.
FruehanRJ: ‘Blast furnaces output will continue to fall’,New Steel, May1998, 14, (5), 34–36.
4.
GroblerFMinnittRCA: ‘The increasing role of direct reduced iron in global steelmaking’,J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall., Mar./Apr. 1999, 99, (2), 111–116.
KomatinaMGudenauHW: ‘The sticking problem during direct reduction of fine iron ore in the fluidized bed’,Metalurgija: J. Metall., Nov. 2004, 10, (4), 309–328.
SohnHY: ‘Suspension ironmaking technology with greatly reduced energy requirement and CO2 emissions’, Steel Times Int., May/Jun.2007, 68–72.
11.
PinegarHKMoatsMSSohnHY: ‘Process Simulation and Economic Feasibility Analysis for a Hydrogen-Based Novel Suspension Ironmaking Technology’, Steel Res. Int'l., 2011, 82, (8), 951–963.
12.
SohnHYChoiMEZhangYRamosJE:‘Suspension ironmaking technology with greatly reduced CO2 emission and energy requirement’in ‘Energy technology perspectives: carbon dioxide reduction and production from alternative sources’(NeelamegghamN R.), 93–101; 2009, Warrendale, PA, TMS.
13.
SohnHYChoiMEZhangYRamosJE: ‘Suspension reduction technology for ironmaking with low CO2 emission and energy requirement’,Iron Steel Technol. (AIST Trans.), 2009, 6, (8), 158–165.
14.
SohnHYChoiME:‘Development of a novel gas-suspension ironmaking technology with greatly reduced energy consumption and CO2 emissions’Proc. 139th TMS Annual Meet.: ‘Supplemental proceedings: Vol. 1: materials processing and properties’(DrelichJ.), 347–354; 2010, Warrendale, PA, TMS.
15.
KimuraHLiuSMoatsMSSohnHY: ‘Process simulation for a novel green ironmaking technology with greatly reduced CO2 emission and energy consumption’, Preprint 2010 SME Annual Meet., Phoenix, AZ, USA, February–March2010, SME.
16.
GuoXJ:‘Process modeling and intelligent system in copper smelter – the concept of future smart smelter’Proc. Copper 2003-Cobre 2003, 5th Int. Conf., Vol. 4, ‘Pyrometallurgy of copper: HermannSchwarze Symposium’ Book 2(DíazC.), 165–177; 2003, Montreal, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum.
SadriMVakhshouriKHashemiMMYM: ‘Coke formation possibility during production of reducing gas in large scale direct reduction plant’,Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2007, 34, 115–123.
19.
Accompanying paper (Part 2).
20.
Accompanying paper (Part 3).
21.
CarraraAPerdichizziABarigozziG: ‘Simulation of an hydrogen production steam reforming industrial plant for energetic performance prediction’,Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, Apr2010, 35, (8), 3499–3508.
22.
WangHChoiMESohnHY:‘Intrinsic hydrogen reduction kinetics of magnetite concentrate particles relevant to a novel green ironmaking technology’Proc. 140th TMS Annual Meet(HwangJ - Y.), 3–10; 2011, New York, Wiley.
23.
LadebeckJRWagnerJP: ‘Catalyst development for water-gas shift’, in ‘Handbook of fuel cells – fundamentals, technology, and applications’, (W. Vielstich et al.), 190–201; 2003, Chichester, John-Wiley and Sons Inc.
ChoiME: ‘Suspension hydrogen reduction of iron ore concentrate’, PhD thesis, Department of Metallurgical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, August2010.
32.
United States Steel Corporation: ‘The making, shaping and treating of steel’, 10th edn; 1985, Warrendale, PA, Association of Iron and Steel Engineers.
StubblesJ: ‘Energy use in the U.S. steeliIndustry: an historical perspective and future opportunities’, US Department of Energy Office of Industrial Technologies, Washington, DC, USA, September, 2000.
