Effect of welding consumables on hydrogen induced cracking of armour grade quenched and tempered steel welds

Abstract

Armour grade quenched and tempered (Q&T) steels are susceptible to hydrogen induced cracking (HIC) in the heat affected zone after welding. Austenitic stainless steel (ASS) consumables are selected for welding Q&T steels as they have higher solubility for hydrogen in the austenitic phase and it is the most beneficial method for controlling HIC in Q&T steel welds. Recent studies reveal that high nickel steel and low hydrogen ferritic steel consumables can be used to weld Q&T steels, which can give very low hydrogen levels in the weld deposits. In this investigation, an attempt has been made to study the effect of welding consumables on hydrogen induced cracking of Q&T steel welds by implant testing. Shielded metal arc (SMAW) welding process has been used for making welds using three different consumables, namely austenitic stainless steel, low hydrogen ferritic steel (LHF) and high nickel steel (HNS) to assess HIC by implant testing. The high nickel steel consumables exhibited a higher value of lower critical stress (LCS) and thus they offered a greater resistance to hydrogen induced cracking of armour grade Q&T steel welds than other consumables. The diffusible hydrogen content and the value of the LCS meets the specified limit for armour grade Q&T steel welds and hence, the LHF consumables can be accepted as an alternative to the to the traditionally used ASS consumables and the proposed HNS consumables.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alkemade

S. J.

: ‘The weld cracking susceptibility of high hardness armour steel’, AR No. 009–659, Defense Science and Technology organization, Adelaide, Australia, 1996, 1–7.

Mirza

R. M.

Gee

: Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 1999, 4, (2), 104–111.

Reddy

G. Madhusudhan

Mohandas

Tagore

G. R. N.

: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1995, 49, 213–228.

Coe

F. R.

: ‘Welding steels without hydrogen cracking’, 2nd edn, 1973, Cambridge, Abington Publishing.

Reddy

G. Madhusudhan

Mohandas

Sarma

D. S.

: Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2003, 8, (6), 407–414.

Rowe

M. D.

Nelson

T. W.

Lippold

J. C.

: Weld. J., 1999, 2, 31s–37s.

Yurioka

Suzuki

: Int. Met. Rev., 1990, 35, 217– 249.

Deb

Challenger

K. D.

Clark

D. R.

: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1988, 77, 155–167.

Kihara

: J. Soc. Nav. Archit. Jpn, 1973, 133, 233–245.

10.

Sawhill

J. M.

Jr Dix

A. W.

Savage

W. F.

: Weld. J., 1974, 53, 554s–560s.

11.

Basu

: Proc. Natl Conf. on ‘Welding–productivity & quality’ (ed. Shah

A. K.

), 73–78; 2007, Ambernath, Naval Materials Laboratory.

12.

‘Standard methods for determination of diffusible-hydrogen content of martensitic, bainatic and ferritic steels produced by arc welding’, AWS Guidelines, 4, 1–30, 1986.

13.

‘Method for determination of diffusible-hydrogen content of deposited weld metal from covered electrodes in welding mild and low alloy steels’, IS 11802, 1–36, 1986.

14.

Coe

F. R.

: ‘Hydrogen in weld metal’, 2nd edn; 1969, Cambridge, Abington Publishing.15. ‘Recommendations for the use of the implant test as on additional information on cold cracking susceptibility when welding steels’, IIS/IIW-447-73, Weld. World, 1974, 1, (2), 9–16.

15.

Granjon

: Metal. Constr. Br. Weld. J., 1969, 11, 505–515.

16.

Ramasubbu

Albert

S. K.

Guruprasad

Bhaduri

A. K.

: Proc. Natl Weld. Semin., (ed. Bhaduri

A. K.

), 342–349; 2006, Chennai, Indian Institute of welding.

17.

Parker

J. D.

Stratford

G. C.

: Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 1999, 4, (1), 29–39.

18.

Murugananth

Bhadeshia

H. K. D. H.

Keehan

Andren

H. O.

Karlsson

: in ‘Mathematical modelling of weld phenomena’, (ed. Cerjak

Bhadeshia

H. K. D. H.

), Vol. 6, 205–230; 2002, London, IOM.

19.

Siewert

T. A.

: Weld. Des. Fabr., 1978, 1, (2), 87–88.

20.

Goodwin

: Weld. J., 1985, 64, (8), 19–20.

21.

Dobly

R. E.

: Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2000, 5, (6), 341–346.

22.

‘Specifications for low alloy steel electrodes for shielded metal arc welding’, ASMEboilerpressurevesselcode, IIC–SFA5?5, 2007,105–107.

23.

Lampman

: ‘Weld integrity and performance’; 1997, Materials Park, OH, ASM International.

24.

Dayal

R. K.

Parvathavarthini

: Sadhana, 2003, 28, 431–451.

25.

Rowe

Liu

: Sci. Technol.Weld. Join., 2001, 6, (6), 387–396.

26.

Asami

Sakai

: Trans. JWRI, 1995, 21, (6), 73–82.

27.

Matsuda

Nakagawa

: Trans. JWRI, 1984, 3, (1), 159–161.

28.

Fuji

Kudo

Takahashi

Mano

: Trans. JWS, 1986, 17 (1), 27–32.

29.

Joseph

Rai

S. K.

Jayakumar

Murugan

: Int. J. Pres. Ves. Pip., 2005, 82, 700–705.

30.

Joseph

Jayakumar

Murugan

: Pract. Metall., 2001, 38, (12), 667–679.

31.

Kou

: ‘Welding metallurgy’, 3rd edn; 1987, New York, John Wiley and Sons.

32.

Murti

V. S. R.

Sastry

Y. R.

Rao

V. G. N.

Reddy

G. M.

: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1993, 37, 759–765.

33.

Magudeeswaran

: ‘Fatigue and Fracture toughness behaviour of armour grade, quenched and tempered, high strength steel joints’, PhD thesis, Annamalai university, Tamilnadu, India, 2008.