Zirconium alloy cladding tubes used in nuclear fuel rods are susceptible to delayed hydride cracking, which is a time dependent crack growth process resulting from the stress assisted diffusion of hydrogen to the crack tip, followed by the formation of radial hydrides and the subsequent fracture of the hydrides in the crack tip region. This article reviews the current understanding of the delayed hydride cracking behaviour of zirconium alloy cladding tubes for fuel rods, focusing on the degradation mechanisms in high burnup fuel rods and transient loading scenarios, which could potentially lead to substantial changes in the hydride microstructure and cladding failure by delayed hydride cracking following removal from the reactor and during storage and disposal of spent nuclear fuel rods in a waste repository. A brief summary of the general characteristics of delayed hydride cracking in zirconium alloy cladding is presented first. Relevant information on the cladding stresses under various usage conditions is then compiled and categorised into several characteristic stress transients that can be anticipated during reactor operation. Delayed hydride cracking in cladding tubes under stress transients is then examined under various temperatures, cooling rates, burnup levels and loading conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RobertsJTA: ‘Structural materials in nuclear power systems’, 60–61; 1981, New York, Plenum Press.
2.
KwakSLLeeJSKimYJParkYW: ‘A probabilistic integrity assessment of flaw in zirconium alloy pressure tube considering delayed hydride cracking’, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 2003, 17B, (8–9), 1587–1593.
3.
MarshallRPLouthanMR: ‘Tensile properties of zircaloy with oriented hydrides’, Trans. ASM, 1963, 63, 693–700.
4.
NorthwoodDOKosasihU: ‘Hydrides and delayed hydrogen cracking in zirconium and its alloys’, Int. Met. Rev., 1983, 28, (2), 92–121.
5.
DuttonRNuttallKPulsMPSimpsonLA: ‘Mechanisms of hydrogen induced delayed cracking in hydride forming materials’, Metall. Trans. A, 1977, 8A, 1553–1562.
6.
CoxB: ‘Environmentally-induced cracking of zirconium alloys – a review’, J. Nucl. Mater., 1990, 170, 1–23.
7.
SagatSPulsMP: ‘Temperature limit for delayed hydride cracking in Zr–2·5% alloys’, Proc. 17th Int. Conf. on ‘Structural mechanics in reactor technology’ (SMiRT 17), Prague, Czech Republic, August 2003, International Association for Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Paper G06-4, 1–8.
8.
SimpsonCJEllisCE: ‘Delayed hydrogen embrittlement in Zr–2·5 wt% Nb alloys’, J. Nucl. Mater., 1974, 52, 289–295.
9.
ColemanCEAmblerJFR: ‘Susceptibility of zirconium alloys to delayed hydrogen cracking’, in ‘Zirconium in the nuclear industry: Third Conference’, ASTM STP 633, (ed. A. L. Lowe and G. W. Parry), 589–607; 1977, Philadelphia, PA, ASTM International.
10.
MoanGDColemanCEPriceEGRodgersDKSagatS: ‘Leak-before-break in the pressure tubes of CANDU reactors’, Int. J. Pres. Ves. Pip.1990, 43, 1–21.
11.
ParkYWKangSSHanBS: ‘Structural integrity assessment of pressure tubes for Wolsong Unit 1 based on operational experiences’, Nucl. Eng. Des.., 2002, 212, 41–48.
12.
SimpsonLAPulsMP: ‘The effects of stress temperatures and hydrogen content on hydride-induced crack growth in Zr–2·5 Pct Nb’, Metall. Trans. A, 1979, 10A, 1093–1105.
13.
ShiSQPulsMP: ‘Criteria for fracture initiation at hydrides in zirconium alloys-I. Sharp crack tip’, J. Nucl. Mater., 1994, 208, 232–242.
14.
ShiSQPulsMPSagatS: ‘Criteria for fracture initiation at hydrides in zirconium alloys-II. Shallow notch’, J. Nucl. Mater., 1994, 208, 243–250.
15.
International Atomic Energy Agency: ‘Delayed hydride cracking in zirconium alloys in pressure tube nuclear reactors’, Final Report of a Coordinated Research Project, 1998–2000, IAEA-TECDOC-1410, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 2004.
16.
EdsingerKDaviesJHAdamsonRB: ‘Degraded fuel cladding fractography and fracture behavior’, in ‘Zirconium in the nuclear industry: Twelfth International Symposium’, ASTM STP 1354, (ed. G. P. Sabol and G. D. Moan), 316–339; 2000, West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM International.
International Atomic Energy Agency: ‘Fuel failure in water reactors: causes and mitigation’, Proc. Technical Meet. held in Bratislava, Slovakia, June 2002, IAEA, IAEA-TECDOC-1345.
19.
ArmijoJS:’ Performance of failed fuel’, Proc. 1994 Int. Topical Meet. on ‘LWR fuel performance’, West Palm Beach, FL, USA, April 1994, ANS, 410–422.
20.
LinK.-FChubgC.-SYehJ.-JChenJ.-HChuS.-SLinL.-F: ‘Investigation on the post-defect deterioration of nonbarrier BWR failed rods’, Proc. 1994 Int. Topical Meet. on ‘LWR fuel performance’, West Palm Beach, FL, USA, April 1994, ANS, 377–390.
21.
ChengBOberlanderBCWiesenackWYagnikSTurnbullJ: ‘An in-reactor simulation test to evaluate root cause of secondary degradation of defective BWR fuel rod’, in ‘Zirconium in the nuclear industry: Thirteenth International Symposium’, ASTM STP 1423, (ed. G. D. Moan and P. Rudling), 616–633; 2002, West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM International.
22.
LysellGGrigorievV: ‘Characteristics of axial splits in failed BWR fuel rods’, Proc. 9th Int. Symp on ‘Environmental degradation of materials in nuclear power systems – water reactors’, Newport Beach, CA, USA, August 1999, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 1169.
23.
KimYS: ‘PWR fuel failure analysis due to hydriding based on pie data’. Proc. Technical Meet. held in Bratislava, Slovakia, June 2002, IAEA, IAEA-TECDOC-1345, 137–147.
24.
RudlingPIngemanssonTWikmarkG: ‘Operation and fuel design strategies to minimize degradation of failed BWR fuel’, Proc.Technical Meet. held in Bratislava, Slovakia, June 2002, IAEA, IAEA-TECDOC-1345, 239–254.
25.
ChungHM: ‘Understanding hydride- and hydrogen-related processes in high-burnup cladding in spent-fuel-storage and accident situations’, Proc. Int. Meet. on ‘LWR fuel performance’, Orlando, FL, USA, September 2004, ANS, Paper 1064.
26.
YangRL: ‘Resolving our understanding of REP-Na1 microstructural analysis’, Proc. 2004 Int. Meet. on ‘LWR fuel performance’, Orlando, FL, USA, September 2004, ANS, Paper 1094, 565–575.
27.
CRWMS M&O: ‘Hydride-related degradation of SNF cladding under repository conditions’, ANL-EBS-MD-000011, Rev. 00 ICN 01, CRWMS M&O, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2000.
28.
GuedeneyPTrotabasMBoschieroMForatCBlanpainP: ‘FRAGEMA fuel rod behaviour characterization at high burnup’, Proc. Int. Topical Meet. on ‘LWR fuel performance’: ‘Fuel for the 90’s’, Avignon, France, April 1991, ANS, 627–638.
29.
GardeAMSmithGPPirekRC: ‘Effects of hydride precipitate localization and neutron fluence on the ductility of irradiated Zircaloy-4’, in ‘Zirconium in the nuclear industry: Eleventh International Symposium’, (ed. E. R. Bradley and G. P. Sabol), 407–430; 1996, Philadelphia, PA, ASTM International.
30.
LemoineFCadaracheCEBalourdetM: ‘RIA related analytical studies and separate effect tests’, Proc. 1997 Int. Topical Meet. on ‘Light water reactor fuel performance’, Portland, OR, USA, March 1997, ANS, 693–703.
31.
PapinJBalourdetMLemoineFLamareFFrizonnetJMSchmitzF: ‘French studies on high burnup fuel transient behavior under RAI conditions’, J. Nucl. Saf., 1996, 37, (4), 289–327.
32.
MeyerROMcCardellRKChungHMDiamondDJScottHH: ‘A regulatory assessment of test data for reactivity-initiated accidents’, J. Nucl. Saf., 1996, 37, (4), 271–288.
33.
SmithGPPirekRCFreeburnHRSchrireD: ‘The evaluation and demonstration of methods for improved nuclear fuel utilization’, DOE/ET/34013-15, DOE, Washington, DC, USA, 1994.
34.
YangRLOzerOKlepferHH: ‘Fuel performance evaluation for EPRI program planning’, Proc. Int. Topical Meet. on ‘LWR fuel performance’, Avignon, France, April, ANS, Vol. 1, 258–271.
35.
PierronONKossDAMottaATChanKS: ‘The influence of hydride blisters on the fracture of Zircaloy-4’, J. Nucl. Mater., 2003, 322, 21–35.
36.
HayashiHEtohYTsukudaY: ‘Outside-in failure of BWR segment rods during power ramp tests’, Proc.Technical Meet. held in Bratislava, Slovakia, June 2002, IAEA, IAEA-TECDOC-1345, 148–163.
HuangFHMillsWJ: ‘Delayed hydride cracking behavior for ZIRCALOY-2 tubing’, Metall. Trans. A, 1991, 22A, 2049–2060.
39.
ColemanCE: ‘Effect of texture on hydride reorientation and delayed hydrogen cracking in cold-worked Zr–2·5Nb’, in ‘Zirconium in the nuclear industry: Fifth Conference’, ASTM STP 754, (ed. D. G. Franklin), 393–411; 1982, Philadelphia, PA, ASTM International.
40.
KimYSKimSSKwonSCImKSCheongYM: ‘Anisotropic threshold stress intensity factor, KIH and crack growth rate in delayed hydride cracking of Zr–2·5Nb pressure tubes’, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2002, 33A, 919–925.
41.
ShiSQPulsMP: ‘Dependence of the threshold stress intensity factor on hydrogen concentration during delayed hydride cracking in zirconium alloys’, J. Nucl. Mater., 1994, 218, 30–36.
SagatSColemanCEGriffithsMWilkinsBJS: ‘The effect of fluence and irradiation temperature on delayed hydride cracking in Zr–2·5Nb’, in ‘Zirconium in the nuclear industry: Tenth International Symposium’, ASTM STP 1245, (ed. A. M Garde and E. R. Bradley), 35–61; 1994, Philadelphia, PA, ASTM International.
44.
PetterssonKKeseKEfsingP: ‘Studies on delayed hydride cracking of zircaloy cladding’, Proc. 9th Int. Symp. on ‘Environmental degradation of materials in nuclear power systems – water reactors’, (ed. F. P. Ford et al.), 1211–1224; 1999, Warrendale, PA, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society.
45.
EfsingPPetterssonK: ‘Delayed hydride cracking in irradiated Zircaloy cladding’, in ‘Zirconium in the nuclear industry: Twelfth International Symposium’, ASTM STP 1354, (ed. G. P. Sabol and G. D. Moan), 340–355; 2000, West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM International.
46.
GrigorievVJakobssonR: ‘Delayed hydrogen cracking velocity and J-integral measurement on irradiated BWR cladding’, J. ASTM Int., 2, (8), JAI12434.
47.
JainVCragnolinoGHowardL: ‘A review report on high burnup spent nuclear fuel – disposal issues’, CNWRA 2004-08, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Contract NRC-02-02-012, Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, San Antonio, TX, USA, 2004.
48.
CRWMS M&O: ‘Initial cladding condition’, ANL-EBS-MD-000048, Rev. 00 ICN 01, CRWMS M&O, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2000.
49.
SiegmannEMcCoyJKHowardR: ‘Cladding evaluation in the Yucca Mountain repository performance assessment’, MRS Proc., 2000, 608, 3–9.
50.
CRWMS M&O: ‘Clad degradation – summary and abstraction’, ANL-WIS-MD-000007, Rev. 00 ICN 01, CRWMS M&O, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2000.
51.
CunninghamMESimonenEPAllemannRTLevyISHazeltonRFGilbertER: ‘Control of degradation of spent LWR fuel during dry storage in an inert atmosphere’, PNL-6364, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA, 1987.
52.
KimYS: ‘Hydride reorientation and delayed hydride cracking of spent fuel rods in dry storage’, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2009, 40A, 2867–2875.
53.
BrochardJBentejacFHourdequinN: ‘Nonlinear finite element studies of the pellet–cladding mechanical interaction in a PWR fuel’, Proc. 14th Int. Conf. on ‘Structural mechanics in reactor technology’ (SMiRT 14), Lyon, France, August 1997, ANS, Paper CW/4, 271–278.
54.
BrochardJBentejacFHourdequinNSerorSVerdeauCFandeurOLansiartSVerpeauxP: ‘Modelling of pellet cladding interaction in PWR fuel’, Proc. 16th Int. Conf. on ‘Structural mechanics in reactor technology’ (SMiRT 16), Washington, DC, USA, August 2001, ANS, Paper 1314, 1–8.
55.
BourreauSLansiartSCouffinPVerdeauCDecroixGM: ‘Influence of the hold period on the fuel rod behaviour during a power ramp’, in ‘Fuel chemistry and pellet–clad interaction related to high burnup fuel’, IAEA-TECDOC-1179, 63–73; 1998, Vienna, IAEA.
56.
BourreauSBrochardJBentejacFCouffinPVerdeauCLansiartSCayetNGrandjeanMCMermazFBlanpainP: ‘Ramp testing of PWR fuel and multi-dimensional finite element modeling of PCMI’, Proc. 2000 Int. Topical Meet. on ‘Light water reactor fuel performance’, Park City, UT, USA, April 2000, ANS, CD ROM.
57.
SchäfflerIGeyerPBouffiouxPDelobelloP: ‘Thermomechancial behavior and modeling between 350°C and 400°C of zircaloy-4 cladding tubes from an unirradiated state to high fluence (0 to 85×1024 nm−2, E>1MeV)’, J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 2000, 122, 169–176.
58.
SuzukiMUetsukaH: ‘Development of fuel performance code FEMAXI-6 and analysis of mechanical loading on cladding during power ramp for high burnup fuel rod’, Proc. echnical Meet. held in Bratislava, Slovakia, June 2002, IAEA, IAEA-TECDOC-1345, 217–238.
59.
RetelVTrivaudeyFBoubakarMLPerreuxDTheveninP: ‘Comparative effects of structural and material parameters variability on pellet–cladding interaction in a PWR fuel rod’, Nucl. Eng. Des., 2004, 228, 35–46.
60.
BillauxM: ‘Modeling pellet–cladding mechanical interaction and application to BWR maneuvering’, Proc. 2004 Int. Meet. on ‘LWR fuel performance’, Orlando, FL, USA, September 2004, ANS, Paper 1047, 576–584.
61.
AhnTGaskinsFPomereningDBaileyM: ‘Hydride effects in the cladding performance for the safe geological disposal of high-level waste’, Proc. ASTM Workshop on ‘Hydride reorientation in zircaloy alloys’, Costa Mesa, CA, USA, January–February 2007, NRC, ML063540231.
62.
BroekD: ‘Elementary engineering fracture mechanics’, 73–77; 1978, Alphen aan den Rijn, Sijthoff & Noordhoff.
63.
SimpsonLACannCD: ‘Fracture toughness of zirconium hydride and its influence on the crack resistance of zirconium alloys’, J. Nucl. Mater., 1979, 87, 303–316.
64.
ShiSQPulsMP: ‘Fracture strength of hydride precipitates in Zr–2·5Nb alloys’, J. Nucl. Mater., 1999, 275, 312–317.
65.
McMeekingRMEvansAG: ‘Mechanics of transformation-toughening in brittle materials’,J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1982, 65, (5)242–246.
66.
PanY.-MChanKSRhiaD: ‘Development of performance criteria for high burnup cladding materials’, SwRI IR&D Project 20-R9565, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, USA, 2006. Synopsis available at http:/www.swri.org/3pubs/IRD2007/synopses/209565.htm
67.
PulsMP: ‘Effects of crack tip stress states and hydride–matrix interaction stresses on delayed hydride cracking’, Metall. Trans. A, 1990, 21A, 2905–2917.
68.
ChanKSLeeY.-DDavidsonDLHudakSJ: ‘A fracture mechanics approach to high cycle fretting fatigue based on the worst case fret concept part I – Model development’, Int. J. Fract., 2001, 112, 299–330.
69.
YuanXQTangriK: ‘Metallographic observations on the developing hydride morphology at the crack tip during hydrogen induced delayed cracking in a Zr–2·5 Nb alloy’, J. Nucl. Mater., 1982, 105, 310–317.
70.
YanDEadieRL: ‘The near threshold behaviour of delayed hydride cracking in Zr–2·5 wt% Nb’, Int. J. Pres. Ves. Pip., 2000, 77, 167–177.
71.
ShekGKJovanovicMTSeahraHMaYLiDEadieRL: ‘Hydride morphology and abriation formation during delayed hydride cracking in Zr–2·5% Nb’, J. Nucl. Mater., 1996, 231, 221–230.
72.
JernkvistLO: ‘A model for predicting pellet-cladding interaction-induced fuel rod failure’, Nucl. Eng. Des., 1995, 156, 393–399.
73.
ColemanCESagatSAmouzouviKF: ‘Control of microstructure to increase the tolerance of zirconium alloys to hydride cracking’, AECL-9524, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd, Chalk River, Ont., Canada, 1987.
74.
KimSSKimYSKukI.-H: ‘The effect of texture variation on delayed hydride cracking behavior of Zr–2·5% Nb plate’, J. Nucl. Mater., 1999, 273, (1), 52–59.
75.
KimSSKwonSCChooKNCheongYMKimYS: ‘Effects of texture on KIH in the radial direction in Zr–2·5% Nb pressure tube materials’, Key Eng. Mater., 2000, 183–187, 845–850.
76.
KreynsPHBourgeoisWFWhiteCJCharpentierPLKammenzindBFFranklinDG: ‘Embrittlement of reactor core materials’, in ‘Zirconium in the nuclear industry: Eleventh International Symposium’, ASTM STP 1295, (ed. E. R. Bradley and G. P. Sabol), 758–782; 1996, West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM International.
77.
ChanKSLeeY.-D: ‘A fracture mechanics-based model for assessing the mechanical failure of nuclear fuel rods due to rock fall’, Nucl. Eng. Des., 2000, 201, 209–226.
78.
BertolinoGMeyerGIpiñaJP: ‘Mechanical properties degradation at room temperature in Zircaloy-4 by hydrogen brittleness’, Mater. Res., 2002, 5, 1–13.
79.
BertschJHoffelnerW: ‘Crack resistance curves determination of tube cladding material’, J. Nucl. Mater., 2006, 352, 116–125.
80.
RaynaudPAKossDAMottaATChanKS: ‘Fracture toughness of hydrided zircaloy-4 sheet under through-thickness crack growth conditions’, J. ASTM Int., 2008, 5, JAI101183.
81.
BannisterMShercliffHBaoGZokFAshbyMF: ‘Toughening in brittle systems by ductile bridging ligaments’, Acta Metall. Mater., 2002, 40, 1531–1537.
82.
BowerAFOrtizM: ‘A three-dimensional analysis of crack trapping and bridging by tough particles’, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1991, 39, 815–858.
ChanKSDavidsonDL: ‘Delineating ductile-phase toughening and brittle-phase embrittlement in Nb-based in-situ composites’, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2001, 32A, 2717–2727.
85.
HuangJ.-HHuangS.-P: ‘Evidence of discontinuous crack growth in delayed hydride cracking of a zirconium alloy’, J. Scr. Metall., 1992, 27, 1247–1251.
86.
McMinnADarbyESchofieldJS: ‘The terminal solid solubility of hydrogen in zirconium alloys’, in ‘Zirconium in the nuclear industry: Twelfth International Symposium’, ASTM STP 1354, (ed. G. P. Sabol and G. D. Moan), 173–195; 2000, West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM International.
87.
SchofieldJSDarbyECGeeCF: ‘Temperature and hydrogen concentration limits for delayed hydride cracking in irradiated Zircaloy’, in ‘Zirconium in the nuclear industry: Thirteenth International Symposium’, ASTM STP 1423, (ed. G. D. Moan and P. Rudling), 339–357; 2002, West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM International.
88.
SandersTLSeagerKDRashidYRBarrettPRMalinauskasAPEinzigerREJordanHDuffeyTASutherlandSHReardonPC: ‘A method for determining the spent-fuel contribution to transport cask containment requirements’, SAND90-2406, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 1992.
89.
GardeAM: ‘Enhancement of aqueous corrosion of Zircaloy-4 due to hydride precipitation at the metal–oxide interface’, in ‘Zirconium in the nuclear industry: Ninth International Symposium’, ASTM STP 1132, (ed. C. M. Eucken and A. M. Garde), 566–594; 1991, West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM International.
90.
CottomBAMayoMJ: ‘Fracture toughness of nanocrystalline ZrO2–3mol% Y2O3 determined by Vickers indentation’, Scr. Mater., 1996, 34, (5), 809–814.
91.
CoxB: ‘Pellet–clad interaction (PCI) failures of zirconium alloys fuel cladding – a review’, J. Nucl. Mater., 1990, 172, 249–292.
92.
PescatoreCCowgillMGSullivanTM: ‘Zircaloy cladding performance under spent fuel disposal conditions’, BNL52235, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA, 1989.
93.
RanjanGVBrooksGNMillerAK: ‘Stresses and strains at zircaloy cladding ridges’, Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on ‘Structural mechanics in reactor technology’, (ed. T. Jaeger and B. A. Boley), Vol. D, Paper D3/3; 1979, Berlin, International Congress Center.
94.
EinzigerREBrownCLHornsethGPInterranteCG: ‘Data needs for storage and transportation of high burnup fuel’,Radwaste Solut., 2005, 44–56.
95.
FerryCPoinssotC: ‘Expected evolution of spent nuclear fuel in long term dry storage: consequences on the RN source-term models’, Proc. CEA–NRC Meet., Washington DC, USA, 2005, NRC(Presentation only).
96.
ChuHCWuSKKuoRC: ‘Hydride reorientation in Zircaloy-4 cladding’, J. Nucl. Mater., 2008, 373, 319–327.
97.
DaumRSMajumdarSLiuYBiloneMC: ‘Radial-hydride embrittlement of high-burnup Zircaloy-4 fuel cladding’, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 2006, 43, 1054–1067.
98.
KearnsJJ: ‘Dissolution kinetics of hydride platelets in zircaloy-4’, J. Nucl. Mater., 1968, 27, 64–72.
