A new approach including the use of archaeological analogues is needed to predict corrosion phenomena over extended time periods lasting centuries to several millennia. The corrosion rates observed on analogues generally range from 0·1 to 10 μm/year, depending on the medium. Isotopic markers (deuterium or oxygen-18) can be used on archaeological objects to determine and localise the anodic and/or cathodic mechanisms. Modelling and simulation take into account statistical aspects (modelling by cellular automata) and kinetics, including localised corrosion phenomena (pitting factor).
FeronDCrussetDGrasJ.-M and MacdonaldDD: ‘Prediction of long term corrosion behaviour in nuclear waste systems’201; 2004Chatenay-MalabryANDRA.
2.
MillerWMChapmanNMcKinleyIAlexanderR and SmellieJAT: ‘Natural analogue studies in the geological disposal of radioactive wastes’; 1994AmsterdamElsevier.
3.
MillerWAlexanderRChapmanNMcKinleyJC and SmellieJAT: ‘Geological disposal of radioactive wastes and natural analogues’; 2000OxfordElsevier.
4.
SmartNR and AdamsR: ‘Natural anaolgues for expansion due to the anaerobic corrosion of ferrous metals’Technical Report TR-06-44, Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB, Stockholm, Sweden2006.
5.
EwingRC and JercinovicMJ: Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.19878467–83.
6.
MillerB and ChapmanN: Radwaste Mag. Jan. 199532–42.
RosborgB and WermeL: J. Nucl. Mater.2008379(1-3)142–153.
9.
EwingRC: Nucl. Waste Manage.1979157–68.
10.
LibourelGVerney-CarronAAndreasMorlokGinSSterpenichJMichelinANeffD and DillmannP: CR Geosci.2011343(2-3)237–245.
11.
SterpenichJ and LibourelG: J. Non-Cryst. Solids2006352, 5446-5451.
12.
DillmannPWatkinsonDAngeliniE and AdriensA: ‘Corrosion and conservation of cultural heritage metallic artefacts’599; 2013OxfordWoodhead Publishing.
13.
L'HéritierMDillmannPTimbertA and BernardiP: ‘The role of iron armatures in gothic constructions: reinforcement, consolidation or commissioner's choice’in ‘Nuts and bolt of construction history. Culture, technology and society’, Vol. 2, (ed. CarvaisRet al.); 2012ParisPicard557–564.
14.
BorkR (ed.): ‘De re metallica: the uses of metal in the Middle Ages’Vol. 4; 2005BurlingtonAshgate.
15.
MatthiesenHHilbertLR and GregoryDJ: Stud. Conserv.200348(3)183–194.
16.
SoerensenB and GregoryD: ‘In situ preservation of artifacts in Nydam Mose’Proc. Int. Conf. on ‘Metals conservation’, Draguignan-Figanières, France, May 1998, Maney94–99.
17.
MatthiesenHGregoryDSørensenBAlstrømT and JensenP: ‘Monitoring methods in mires and meadows: five years of studies at Nydam mose, Denmark’Proc. 2nd ‘Preserving Archaeological Sites In Situ (PARIS2)’ Conf., London, UK, September 2001, Museum of London Archaeology Service, 91-97.
18.
JorgensenE and PetersenPV: ‘Nydam Bog – new finds and observations’in ‘The spoils of victory. The north in the shadow of the Roamn Empire’, (ed. JorgensenLet al.), 258–285; 2003CopenhagenNational Museum of Denmark.
19.
ScottDA and EggertG: ‘Iron and steel in art: corrosion, colorants, conservation’232; 2009PlymouthArchetype Publications Ltd
20.
JohnsonAB and FrancisB: ‘Durability of metals from Archaeological objects, metal meteorites and native metals’PN 3198, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Washington, DC, USA1980.
21.
JohnsonAB: ‘Lessons in metal durability from the ancient metals’Proc. CEC Natural Analogue Working Group 3rd Meet., Snowbird, UT, USA, June1988Commission of the European Community228–231.
22.
CoghlanH: Sibrium19563129–136.
23.
JohnsonAB and FrancisB: ‘Durability of metals from archaeological objects, metal meteorites, and native metals’Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Washington, DC, USA1980.
24.
AbduB and GordonR: J. Archaeol. Sci.200431979–998.
25.
GodfreyE and van NieM: J. Archaeol. Sci.200431(8), 1117-1125.
26.
SahebMNeffDDillmannPMatthiesenHFoyE and Bellot-GurletL: Mater. Corros.200960(2)99–105.
27.
VegaE: ‘Altération des objets ferreux archéologiques sur le site de Glinet (Seine-maritime, France, XVIe siècle). Caractérisation des produits de corrosion et étude des mécanismes’PhD thesis, Université de Technologie de Belfort Montbéliard, Belfort, France2004.
28.
NeffDDillmannPBellot-GurletL and BerangerG: Corros. Sci.200547(2)515–535.
29.
FellV and WilliamsJ: ‘Monitoring of archaeological and experimental iron at Fiskerton’in Proc. Conf. Metal 04, (ed. AshtonJ, .), 17–27; 2004Canberra, ACTNational Museum of Australia.
30.
MatthiesenHSalomonsenE and SørensenB: J. Archaeol. Sci.200431, 1451-1461.
31.
MonnierJNeffDRéguerSDillmannPBellot-GurletLLeroyEFoyELegrandL and GuillotI: Corros. Sci.201052(3)695–710.
32.
ChittyW.-J: ‘Etude d'analogues archéologiques pour la prévision de la corrosion pluri-séculaire des armatures du béton armé: caractérisation, mécanismes et modélisation’, PhD thesis, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, Compiègne, France2006.
33.
NielsenNA: ‘Corrosion and metal artifacts: a dialogue between conservators and archaeologists’17–37; 1977Washington, DCNational Bureau of Standards.
34.
PearsonC: Stud. Conserv.19721791–110.
35.
NorthNA: Stud. Conserve.19822775–83.
36.
KergourlayF: ‘Étude des mécanismes de déchloruration d'objets archéologiques ferreux corrodés en milieu marin – Cas des traitements en solutions alcalines aérée et désaérée’PhD thesis, Créteil Paris Est, Paris, France2012.
37.
SahebM: ‘Etude des mécanismes de corrosion à très long terme des objets ferreux en milieu anoxique: Apport des analogues archéologiques’PhD thesis, Université Paris Est, Paris, France2009.
38.
PonsELemaitreCDavidD and CrusserD: ‘Electrochemical study of steel artefacts from WWI: contribution of A. C. impedance spectroscopy and chronoamperometry to describe the behaviour of the corrosion layers’in ‘Corrosion of metallic heritage artefacts, investigation, conservation and prediction for long term behaviour’, (eds. DillmannPet al.), 77–91; 2007LondonWoodhead Publishing.
39.
SahebMDescostesMNeffDMatthiesenHMichelinA and DillmannP: Appl. Geochem.201025(12), 1937-1948.
40.
GregoryD and MatthiesenH: Conserv. Manage. Archaeol. Sites201214(1-4)479–486.
41.
MatthiesenHGregoryDJensenP and SørensenB: J. Wetland Archaeol.2004455–74.
42.
MatthiesenHHilbertLRGregoryD and SoerensenB: ‘Long term corrosion of iron at the waterlogged site Nydam in Denmark: studies of environment, archaeological artefacts, and modern analogues’Proc. 2nd Int, Workshop On ‘Prediction of long term corrosion behaviour in nuclear waste systems’, Nice, France, September2004. European Federation of Corrosion, 114-127.
43.
VegaEDillmannPBergerP and FluzinP: ‘Species transport in the corrosion products of ferrous archaeological analogues: contribution to the modelling of long-term iron corrosion mechanisms’in ‘Corrosion of metallic heritage artefacts: investigation, conservation and prediction for long term behaviour’, (ed. DillmannPet al.), 92–108; 2007CambridgeWoodhead Publishing.
44.
RemazeillesCDheillyASableSLannelucINeffD and RefaitP: Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol.201045(5)388–394.
45.
RémazeillesCSahebMNeffDGuilminotETranKBourdoiseauJ.-ASabotRJeanninMMatthiesenHDillmannP and RefaitP: J. Raman Spectrosc.201041(11), 1425-1433.
46.
BerrangerM and FluzinP: Archaeometry201254(4)664–684.
47.
PagèsGDillmannPFluzinP and LongL: J. Archaeol. Sci.201138, 1234-1252.
48.
FulfordMSimDDoigA and PainterJ: J. Archaeol. Sci.200532(2)241–250.
49.
StewartJWCharlesJA, and WallachER: Mater. Sci. Technol.200116291–303.
50.
MisawaTKyunoTSuetakaW and ShimodaiS: Corros. Sci.197111(1)35.
51.
BalasubramaniamR and DillmannP: ‘Corrosion resistance of the Delhi Iron Pillar – scale characterisation and passive film growth models’Proc. Int. Workshop On ‘Prediction of long term corrosion behaviour in Nuclear Wastes System’, Cadarache, France,2002LondonIOM261–279.
BalasubramaniamR: ‘Delhi Iron Pillar – new insights’168; 2002New DelhiAryan Book International.
54.
BalasubramaniamR and KumarAVR: Corros. Sci.200042, 2085-2101.
55.
BalasubramaniamR: Corros. Sci.200042, 2103-2129.
56.
HudsonJC: Nature1953172499–500.
57.
VatsPMS and HonyMA: ‘The Gupta temple at Deogarh’48; 1999New DelhiArchaeological Survey of India.
58.
LefebvreE: ‘Les tirants de fer de la cathédrale Notre-Dame d’Amiens’, in ‘L'emploi du fer et du plomb dans l'architecture gothique’, (ed. TimbertA), 141–147; 2009ParisPicard.
59.
MonnierJVantelonDReguerS and DillmannP: J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom.201126885–891.
60.
YamashitaMMiyukiHMatsudaYNaganoH and MisawaT: Corros. Sci.199436(2)283–299.
61.
YoshikawaHGunjiE and TokudaM: J. Nucl. Mater.2008379112–117.
62.
BertrandLDillmannPDowsettMG and AdriensA: ‘Ancient and historical systems’in ‘GENNESYS White Paper: a new European partneship between nanomaterials science and nanotechnology and synchrotron radiation and neutron facilities’, (ed. DoschHet al.), 241–246; 2009StuttgartMax Planck Gesellschaft.
63.
NeffDSahebMMonnierJPerrinSDescostesML'HostisVCrussetDMillardA and DillmannP: J. Nucl. Mater.2010402(2-3)196–205.
64.
BurgerE.MonnierJ.BergerP.NeffD.L'HostisV.PerrinS. and DillmannP., J. Mater. Res.201126(24), 3107-3115.
65.
MichelinADrouetEFoyEDynesJJNeffD and DillmannP: J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom.201328(1)59–66.
66.
BataillonCBouchonFChainais-HillairetCDesgrangesCHoarauEMartinFPerrinSTupinM and TalandierJ: Electrochim. Acta201055(15), 4451-4467.
67.
BataillonC.MusyC. and RoyM., J. Phys IV France200111267–274.
68.
ChittyW.-JDillmannPL'HostisV and MillardA: Corros. Sci.200850(11), 3047-3065.
69.
AntonyHPeulonSLegrandL and ChausséA: Electrochim. Acta200450, 1015-1021.
70.
AntonyHPerrinSDillmannPLegrandL and ChausséA: Electrochim. Acta200752(27), 7754-7759.
71.
LairVAntonyHLegrandL and ChausseA: Corros. Sci.200648, 2050-2063.
72.
MonnierJDillmannPLegrandL and GuillotI: Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol.201045(5)375–380.
73.
TaniguchiNKawasakiMKawakamiS and KubotaM: ‘Corrosion behaviour of carbon steel in contact with bentonite under anaerobic condition’Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop On ‘Prediction of long term corrosion behaviour in nuclear waste systems’, Nice, France, September,2004. European Federation of Corrosion and ANDRA: Nice.
74.
di CaprioDVautrin-UlCStafiejJSaunierJChausseAFeronD and BadialiJP: Corros. Sci.201153(1)418–425.
