Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Mineral resource and ore reserve estimates are founded on two sources of data: tonnage and grade. The tonnage is a product of volume and density; both of which are estimates. Density impacts numerous operational factors, which include, but are not limited to, mine design, mine planning, equipment selection and operational performance. Hence, density is a significant parameter and its determination requires similar care as the measurement of grade. This paper provides an overview of methods used to determine density within the Anglo American Group. It is not the purpose of this paper to identify a preferred method, but to highlight the importance of choosing the best suited practice for a project or mine site. In addition, a case study comparing two different density determination methods applied to the same rock samples from the Los Bronces Copper mine in Chile was undertaken and the results of that study are presented here. Selecting the most appropriate method to determine density and comparing results from two or more techniques against each other, together with other suitable quality control procedures, is considered to be essential for mining operations and exploration projects in order to reduce risk and to improve operational performance, which in turn increases profit margin.

Keywords

Bulk density Density determination Mineral resources Los Bronces Core pycnometer

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abzalov

. 2013. Measuring and modelling of dry bulk rock density for mineral resource estimation. Appl. Earth Sci., 122, pp. 16–29.

Arseneau

. 2014. Estimating bulk density for mineral resource reporting. Can. Inst. Min. Metall. J., 5, pp. 95–100.

AS1038·21·1·2-2002. Higher rank coal and coke – Relative density – Analysis sample/volumetric method. Standards Australia, Sydney.

AS1038·26-2005. Higher rank coal and coke – Guide for the determination of apparent relative density. Standards Australia, Sydney.

AS1038·21·1·1-2008. Higher rank coal and coke – Relative density – Analysis sample/density bottle method. Standards Australia, Sydney.

Dry

JHS

and Pelo

. 2013. Validation of the CorePyc for density measurements of drill cores. Unpublished report, Anglo American, p. 93.

Jarman

. 2011. Comparison or rock density determination methods used in South African platinum mines for resource planning purposes. MSc thesis (unpublished), University of Pretoria, South Africa.

Lipton

. 2001. Measurement of bulk density for resource estimation. In: A. C. Edwards, ed. Mineral resources and ore reserves estimation – Monograph 23, The AusIMM guide to good practice. Melbourne: The Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, pp. 57–66.

Lipton

and Horton

. 2014. Measurement of bulk density for resource estimation – methods, guidelines and quality control. In: C. Edwards, ed. Mineral resource and ore reserve estimation – Monograph 30, The AusIMM guide to good practice. 2nd ed. Melbourne: The Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, pp. 97–108.

10.

Preston

and Sanders

. 1992. Calculating reserves – a matter of some gravity, in Proceedings of the 26th Newcastle Symposium. New South Wales, Australia, April 1992. pp. 177–82.

11.

Zhou

and Esterle

. 2008. Toward improved coal density estimation for geophysical logs. Expl. Geoph., 39, pp. 124–132.

Determination of bulk density,methods and impacts,with a case study from Los Bronces Mine,Chile †

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References