The incorporation of bulk density uncertainty for Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserves (MRMR) steps is of great importance for successful mine planning process. In practice, most mining projects use an average density value for each lithological type of the deposit. However, density determinations require special attention as they directly affect the conversion of volumes to tonnages and ore grades to metal contents. The objective of this study is to measure and minimize the risks associated with the MRMR stages, including the density variability in mine planning. Traditional interpolation techniques in geostatistics were used to represent density spatial distribution in a block model, similarly to those used for grade estimation. This approach was developed and applied at a Brazilian iron ore mine. The results indicate MRMR are underestimated if density uncertainty is not considered. Mine design changes were observed, including 5% impact on the Life-of-mine (LOM) and 2% in Net Present Value (NPV).
AbzalovMZ.2013. Measuring and modelling of dry bulk rock density for mineral resource estimation. Appl Earth Sci. 122: 16 – 29.
2.
ArroyoCE.2014. Caracterização geometalúrgica e modelagem geoestatística da Mina de Brucutu – Quadrilátero Ferrífero (MG). Tese de Doutorado. Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto.
3.
ArseneauGJ.2014. Estimating bulk density for mineral resource reporting. Vancouver: SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc, p. 1 – 8.
4.
BenterA, MooreW, AntolovichM.2013. Laboratory measurement of fragmented ore bulk density using ground penetrating radar. Min Technol. 122 (4): 250 – 255.
5.
CIM. 2019. Estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves best practise guidelines. CIM Council. November 29.
6.
CoombesJ.2008. The art and science of resource estimation – a practical guide for geologists and engineers. Subiaco: Coombes Capability. p. 174.
7.
CrawfordKM.2013. Determination of bulk density of rock core using standard industry methods [Master's report]. Michigan Technological University.
8.
DiasPM.2012. O uso da densidade nas estimativas de teores de cobre e os impactos observados na reconciliação [Dissertação de Mestrado]. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
9.
DominyS, NoppeM, AnnelsA.2004. Errors and uncertainty in mineral resource and ore reserve estimation: the importance of getting it right. CIM.
10.
GoycooleaM, EspinozaD, MorenoE.2015. Comparing new and traditional methodologies for production scheduling in open pit mining. In: Application of Computers and Operations Research in the Mineral Industry – Proceedings of the 37th International Symposium, APCOM 2015, SME, Englewood, CO, p.352-359.
11.
HopperT, NevilleT, BirtB.2018. Continuous dry bulk density evaluation using borehole magnetic. Resonance and density measurements. AEGC 2018, Sydney.
12.
JamalanS, RashidinejadF.2017. Compare methods of fix lead, Milawa NPV and Milawa balance algorithm in optimizing the production of open pit mines. Open J Geol. 7: 603 – 607.
13.
LaineE.2003. Kriging estimation of block densities in Ahmavaara PGE-deposit. Application of computers and operations research in the minerals industries, South Africa.
14.
LerchsH, GrossmannIF.1965. Optimum design of open pit mines. Can Min Metall Bull. 58 (633): 17 – 24.
15.
LiptonT.2001. Measurement of bulk density for resource estimation. In: Mineral resources and ore reserves estimation, the AusIMM guide to good practice. Melbourne. p. 57–66.
16.
LisboaMC.2018. Impacto da incorporação da variável densidade na estimativa de reservas minerais de ferro: Mina de Brucutu [Dissertação Mestrado]. Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto.
17.
MadaniH, MohammadiAM.1996. Geostatistical reserve estimation in Dorreh barite mine. In: International symposium on application of computers and operations research in the minerals industries. 24 ed. University Park, PN.
18.
MakhuvhaM, ArellanoM, HarneyW.2014. Determination of bulk density, methods and impacts, with a case study from Los Bronces Mine, Chile, 2014.
19.
MottaE, MoraesI, ApolônioP, RibeiroD.2016. Incorporating mineralogical and density parameters in ferrous resource evaluation using mineralogical norm calculation – MNC. 24th World Mining Congress. Rio de Janeiro: IBRAM. p. 209–220.
20.
RupprechtSM.2016. SAMREC CODE – the application of modifying factors. Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Conference, Johannesburg.
21.
SalinasI, EmeryX.2012. Estimacion de recursos en un yacimiento de fierro. Santiago: Departamento de Ingeniería de Minas, Universidad de Chile.
22.
SinclairAJ, BlackwellGH.2002. Bulk density. In: Applied mineral inventory estimation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cap. 15, p. 294–300.
23.
VasconcelosJA.2012. Estudos de caracterização e concentração de Itabirito Compacto do compexo Serra Azul, MG. Tecnol Metal Mater Miner. 9 (2): 89 – 94.
24.
YamamotoJK.2005. Comparing ordinary kriging interpolation variance and indicator kriging conditional variance for assessing uncertainties at unsampled locations. In: DessureaultSean, GanguliRajive, KecojevicVladislav, DwyerJami Girard, editors. Application of computers and operations research in the mineral industry. Leiden: Balkema. p. 265 – 272.
