Review of Brazilian chromite deposits associated with layered intrusions: Geological and petrological constraints for the origin of stratiform chromitites

Abstract

Chromitite layers in mafic-ultramafic layered intrusions represent a special case of cumulate rock where chromite is the sole liquidus (cumulus) mineral. Different mechanisms for the formation of chromitite layers have been postulated. In order to provide geological and petrological constraints for these models, chromitites and hosting mafic and ultramafic rocks from the Bacuri, Niquelândia and Ipueira-Medrado layered complexes in Brazil were investigated. The Bacuri Complex (2·2 Ga) is a large layered intrusion of the Amazon Craton. Chromitite layers of the Bacuri mafic-ultramafic complex are restricted to a 30–120 m-thick sequence of ultramafic cumulates overlying mafic cumulates. Most of the chromite is concentrated in a several metres-thick chromitite layer (the main chromitite) located at the base of the ultramafic cumulates. Cryptic variation of olivine with stratigraphic height (from Fo₈₉ at the base to Fo₇₆ at the top) is consistent with extensive fractionation of the ultramafic sequence. The stratigraphic position of the main chromitite supports a model for its origin associated with a major new influx of primitive parental magma. The cause of chromite saturation must therefore result from changes in magma composition resulting from mixing new influxes of primitive magma with a fractionated magma resident in the magma chamber. The Niquelândia Complex (0·8 Ga) is a large layered intrusion in central Brazil. The Niquelaândia Complex has a thick (up to 4 km) Ultramafic Zone consisting mainly of dunite and interlayered harzburgite, websterite and several centimetres-thick discontinuous chromitite layers. A stratigraphic interval hosting relatively thicker and more consistent layers of chromitite occurs in the intermediate portion of the Ultramafic Zone. Compositional variation of olivine composition through this interval indicates that the magma located below the interval where chromitites occur was more primitive than the magma located above them. This feature is consistent with a model in which chromitites were formed by new influx of primitive magma, and mixing with slightly more fractionated resident magma. It is however intriguing to note that chromitite seams in the Niquelaândia Complex are mainly hosted by dunite. Different from chromitites observed in other large layered intrusions (e.g. Bushveld, Great Dyke), chromitite seams in the Niquelaândia Complex do not appear at the base of cyclic units. In the Niquelaândia Complex, the crystallisation of clinopyroxene as a cumulus mineral occurs immediately after the crystallisation of orthopyroxene. Extensive Cr depletion through clinopyroxene crystallisation is suggested as an explanation for the absence of chromitites at the base of cyclic units in the Niquelaândia Complex. The Ipueira-Medrado intrusion (2·0 Ga) is a small sill (7 km-long, 0·5 km-wide) consisting mainly of a basal Ultramafic Zone (∼250 m-thick) and an upper Mafic Zone (∼40 m-thick). At the upper part of the Ultramafic Zone a thick (5–8 m) and continuous chromitite layer (MCL) occurs. Cryptic variations of olivine suggest that the lowered sequence located below the MCL crystallised in a dynamic magma chamber undergoing frequent replenishment with primitive magma. Chromite compositions are very similar and show no systematic fractionation trends over the 5–8 m of the MCL, indicating that a continuous supply of primitive parental magma occurred during the time span of chromite crystallisation. Cryptic variation data for olivine rule out a model for the origin of the MCL from mixing new influxes of primitive parental magma with a fractionated magma resident in the magma chamber. In fact, the most primitive compositions of olivine occur in dunite and harzburgite located immediately below the MCL. Lithogeochemical and isotope data suggest that chromite crystallisation in the MCL of the Ipueira-Medrado sill was triggered by changes in physical–chemical parameters associated with crustal contamination. We propose that an increase in oxygen fugacity resulting from assimilation of carbonate-rich host rocks was the triggering factor leading to crystallisation of chromite as a sole cumulus phase in the Ipueira-Medrado sill. The unusually thick chromitite layer of the Ipueira-Medrado sill is interpreted to result from a large volume of magma passing through a conduit hosted by carbonate-rich crustal rocks. The examples of chromite deposits studied indicate that chromitite layers are associated with changes in the melt composition at stratigraphic horizons of the magma chamber. However, the specific trigger responsible for appropriate phase changes leading to chromite crystallisation may be different for each deposit.

Keywords

CHROMITE LAYERED INTRUSION MAFIC-ULTRAMAFIC NIQUELANDIA JACURICI BACURI

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Campbell

I. H.

and Murck

B. W.

: ‘Petrology of the G and H chromitite zones in the Mountain View area of the Stillwater Complex, Montana', J. Petrol., 1993, 34, 291–316.

Eales

H. V.

: ‘Implications of the chromium budget of the Western Limb of the Bushveld Complex: South African', S. Afr. J. Geol., 2000, 103, 141–150.

Ferrario

and Garuti

: ‘Platinum-Group minerals in chromite-rich horizons of the Niquelândia complex (Central Goias, Brazil)‘, in: ‘Geo-Platinum 87‘, (ed. Prichard

H. M.

et al), 261–272; 1988, Essex, Elsevier.

Ferreira Filho

C. F.

, Nilson

A. A.

and Naldrett

A. J.

: ‘The Niquelândia mafic—ultramafic complex, Goias, Brazil: a contribu-tion to the ophiolite vs. stratiform controversy based on new geological and structural data', Precam. Res., 1992, 59, 125–143.

Ferreira Filho

C. F.

, Naldrett

A. J.

and Asif

: ‘The distribution of Platinum-Group elements in the Niquelândia layered mafic and ultramafic intrusion, Brazil: implications with regard to explora-tion', Can. Mineral, 1995, 33, 165–184.

Ferreira Filho

C. F.

, Naldrett

A. J.

and Gorton

M. P.

: ‘REE and pyroxene compositional variation across the Niquelandia mafic and ultramafic layered intrusion, Brazil: petrological and metallo-genetic implications', AppL Earth Sci. (Trans. Inst. Min. Metall B), 1998, 107B, 1–22.

Ferreira Filho

C. F.

and Pimentel

M. M.

: ‘Sm-Nd isotope systematics and REE data of troctolites and their metamorphic equivalents of the Niquelândia Complex, central Brazil: further constraints for the timing of magmatism and metamorphism‘, J. South Am. Earth Sci., 2000, 13, 647–659.

Ferreira Filho

C. F.

, Pimentel

M. M.

, Araujo

S. M.

and Laux

J. H.

: ‘Layered Intrusions and volcanic sequences in Central Brazil: geological and geochronological constraints for Mesoproterozoic (1.25 Ga) and Neoproterozoic (0.79 Ga) igneous associations‘, accepted by Precam. Res., 2010.

Girardi

V. A. V.

, Rivalenti

and Sinigoi

: ‘The petrogenesis of the Niquelândia layered basic-ultrabasic complex, central Goias, Brazil', J. Petrol., 1986, 27, 715–744.

10.

Girardi

V. A. V.

, Ferrario

, Correia

C. T.

and Diella

: ‘A comparison of selected Precambrian Brazilian chromitites: chromite, PGE-PGM, and Re/Os as parental source indicators', J. South Am. Earth Sci., 2006, 20, 303–313.

11.

Irvine

T. N.

: ‘Crystallization sequences in the Muskox intrusion and other layered intrusions. II. Origin of chromitite layers and similar deposits of the other magmatic ores', Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 1975, 9, 991–1020.

12.

Irvine

T. N.

: ‘Origin of chromitite layers in the Muskox intrusion and other layered intrusions: a new interpretation', Geology, 1977, 5, 573–577.

13.

Lipin

B. R.

: ‘Pressure increases, the formation of chromite seams, and the development of the ultramafic series in the Stillwater Complex, Montana', J. Petrol., 1993, 34, 955–976.

14.

Lord

R. A.

, Prichard

H. M

, SA

J. H. S.

and Neary

C. R.

: ‘Chromite geochemistry and PGE fractionation in the Campo Formoso Complex and Ipueira-Medrado sill, Bahia State, Brazil‘, Econ. Geol., 2004, 99, 339–363.

15.

Marques

J. C.

and Ferreira Filho

C. F.

: ‘The chromite deposits of the Ipueira-Medrado Sill, Bahia, Brazil', Econ. Geol., 2003, 98, 87–108.

16.

Marques

J. C.

, Ferreira Filho

C. F.

, Carlson

R. W.

and Pimentel

M. M.

: ‘Re-Os and Sm-Nd isotope systematics and trace elements geochemistry constraints for the origin of the chromite deposits of the Ipueira-Medrado sill, Bahia, Brazil', J. Petrol., 2003, 44, 659–678.

17.

Mondal

S. K.

and Mathez

E. A.

: ‘Origin of the UG2 chromitite layer, Bushveld Complex', J. Petrol., 2007, 48, 495–510.

18.

Oliveira

E. P.

, Windley

B. F.

, McNaughtonc

N. J.

, Pimentel

M. M.

and Fletcher

I. R.

: ‘Contrasting copper and chromium metallo-genic evolution of terranes in the Paleoproterozoic Itabuna—Salvador—Curaçá. orogen, São Francisco craton, Brazil: new zircon (SHRIMP) and Sm—Nd (model) ages and their significance for orogen-parallel escape tectonics', Precam. Res., 2004, 128, 143–165.

19.

Pimentel

M. M.

, Spier

C. A.

and Ferreira Filho

C. F.

: ‘Estudo Sm-Nd do Complexo Mafico-Ultramdfico Bacuri, Amapa: Idade da Intrusào, Metamorfismo e Natureza do Magma Original', Rev. Bras. Geoc., 2002, 32, 371–376.

20.

Pimentel

M. M.

, Ferreira Filho

C. F.

and Amstrong

R. A.

: ‘Shrimp U—Pb and Sm-Nd ages of the Niquelândia Layered Complex: Meso (1.25 Ga) and Neoproterozoic (0.79 Ga) extensional events in Central Brazil', Precam. Res., 2004, 132, 133–153.

21.

Pimentel

M. M.

, Ferreira Filho

C. F.

and Armele

: ‘Neoproterozoic age of the Niquelândia complex, Central Brazil: further ID-TIMS and Sm-Nd isotopic evidence', J. South Am. Earth Sci., 2006, 21, 228–238.

22.

Prichard

H. M.

, Sá

J. H. S.

and Fischer

P. C.

: ‘Platinum-group mineral assemblages and chromite composition in the altered and deformed Bacuri Complex, Amapd, Northeastern Brazil', Can. Mineral., 2001, 39, 377–396.

23.

Raedeke

L. D.

and McCallum

I. S.

: ‘Investigations of the Stillwater Complex: Part II. Petrology and petrogenesis of the Ultramafic series', J. Petrol., 1984, 25, 395–420.

24.

Rivalenti

, Correia

C. T.

, Girardi

V. A. V.

, Mazzicchelli

, Tassinari

C. C. G.

and Bertotto

G. W.

: ‘Sr—Nd isotopic evidence for crustal contamination in the Niquelândia complex, Goias, Central Brazil‘, J. South Am. Earth Sci., 2008, 25, 298–312.

25.

Rollinson

: ‘Using geochemical data: evaluation, presentation, interpretation‘, 352; 1993, Essex, Longman Scientific and Technical.

26.

Scoon

R. N.

and Teigler

: ‘Platinum-group element mineraliza-tion in the critical zone of the western Bushveld complex. Part I: sulfide-poor chromitites below the UG-2', Econ. Geol., 1994, 89, 1094–1121.

27.

Spier

C. A.

and Ferreira Filho

C. F.

: ‘The chromite deposits of the Bacuri mafic-ultramafic layered complex, Guyana Shield, Amapá. State, Brazil', Econ. Geol., 2001, 96, 817–835.

28.

Stowe

C. W.

: ‘Compositions and tectonic settings of chromite deposits through time', Econ. Geol., 1994, 89, 528–546.

29.

Ulmer

G. C.

: ‘Experimental investigations of chromite spinels', Econ. Geol. Monographs, 1969, 4, 114–131.

30.

Wenzel

, Baumgartner

L. P.

, Brugmann

, Konnikov

E. G.

and Kislov

E. V.

: ‘Assimilation of dolomitic xenoliths by mafic magma: Evidence from petrological investigations on Mg-skarn bearing dunite cumulates of the Ioko-Dovyren intrusion (North Baikal region, Russia)', J. Petrol., 2002, 43, 2049–2074.

31.

White

R. W.

, Motta

and De Arafijo

V. A.

: ‘Platiniferous chromitite in the Tocantins complex. Niquelandia, Goiás, Brazil', US Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1971, 750D, D26—D33.

32.

Wilson

A. H.

: ‘The Geology of the Great ‘Dyke’, Zimbabwe: The Ultramafic Rocks‘, J. Petrol., 1982, 23, 240–292.