The corrosion behaviour of aluminium alloy 6013-20 SiC(P) at controlled velocities and elevated temperatures was investigated by electrochemical studies. The alloy in temper T4 (solution treated, quenched and naturally aged) showed a higher resistance to corrosion compared to the annealed and as fabricated tempers. It exhibited a decreased resistance to corrosion in 3·5 wt-% NaCl solution containing suspended polystyrene particles at solution velocities 1-3 m s–1. No significant reduction in corrosion resistance was observed in environmental chamber studies. Alloy Al 6013-20 SiC(P) offered good resistance to corrosion in salt spray chamber. The secondary phase intermetallic precipitates were the preferred sites for localised corrosion.
NairS.V.TeinJ. K. and BatespR. C.: Int. Met. Res., 198530275.
2.
AroneR.BolsteinO. and ShpiglerB.: Isr. J. Technol. A19882A393.
3.
McIntyreJ. F.LeA. H.GolledgeS. and ConradR: ‘Corrosion behaviour of SiC reinforced aluminium alloys’Report NSWC-TR-87-326Naval Surface Warfare CentreSilver Spring, MD, USA1987.
4.
SunH.KooE. Y. and GH. Wheat: Corrosion199147, (10), 741–753.
5.
RicksR. A.ParsonN. C.YiuH. L. and A:S.A. in ‘Fifth international aluminium extraction technology’ Vol. 1157–69; 1992ChicagoIL, The Aluminium Association.
6.
MusulinI.: in ‘Fifth international aluminium extraction technol-ogy’ Vol. 1125–33; 1992ChicagoIL, The Aluminium Association.
7.
KerrK. W. and KatchM.: Weld J., 198766251–259.
8.
SkluzakD. andTajimaY.: ‘The use of improved corrosion resistant aluminium alloy6013on the navy D7 aircraft’, Report 90059US Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC, USA198877–92.
9.
BarbosaJ. M. A.RebelloA.AcsradO. and EtelZ.: Metallkd2002933.
10.
GeigerA. L. and AJ. Walker: JOM199143, (8), 811.
11.
AhmadZ.PauletteP. T. and Abdul AleemB. J.: J. Mater. Sci., 2000352573–2574
12.
‘Standard practice for laboratory immersion corrosion testing of metals’, G31–72ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, USA1998.
13.
‘Standard test method for water penetration into pipeline coatings’, G5–87ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, USA1998.
14.
‘Standard test method for conducting potentiodynamic polariza-tion resistance measurements’, G59–91ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, USA2002.
15.
McDonaldD. D.ScottA. C. and WentreckP.: J. Electrochem. Soc., 1979126, (6), 908.
16.
BonewitzR. A.: Corrosion197430, (2), 53–59.
17.
LegaultR. A. and BettinW. J.: Mater. Prot. Perform., 1971109.
18.
FrakerA. C. and RuffiW.A.Jr: Corrosion197127, (4), 151–156.
19.
DickinsonR. L.: Corrosion19652119.
20.
BohlmanE. G.: ‘Reactor chemistry division annual progress report for period ending’Report ORNL3591Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA1964210.
21.
Kaeschett : Z. Phys. Chem. (Frankfurt)19623487–108.
22.
LorkingK. F. and MayneJ. E. O.: J. Appl Chem. (Lond.), 196111170.
23.
LorkingK. F. and MayneJ. E. O.: Brit. Corros. J., 19661, (5), 181.
24.
LiepinaL. and OsisZ.Z: Latvijas PSR Zinatnu Akad Vestis1950(6)35; 1952(8)107.
25.
PryorM. J.: in ‘ Proc. Conf. on ‘Localised corrosion’, (ed. StaehleR. W..), 2; 1974HoustonTX, NACE.
26.
PryorJ.: J. Electrochem. Soc., 195862172.
27.
BurleighT. D.LudwiczakE. and AR. Petri: Corrosion199551, (1), 50–55.
28.
McIntyreJ. F.ConardR. K. and ColledgeS. L.: Corrosion199046902.
29.
ZuJ. B.HutchingsI. M. and BursteinG. T.: Wear1990140331.
30.
SrinivasanS.ScattergoodR. O. and WarrenR.: Met. Trans. A198819A1785.
31.
TrzoskmaP. P. and MccaffertyE.Jr: Electrochem Soc., 198330, (9), 1804.
32.
GorettaK. C.WuW.RoutbortJ. L. and K:P.K.Proc. Cong. on ‘Tribology of composite material’, (ed. RohtagiP. K..), 147; 1996Metals ParkOH, ASM International.
33.
BesterJ. A. and BallA: Wear1998162–16457–63.
34.
TrazskomaP. O.: Corrosion19904642.
35.
AhmadZ and Abdul AleemB. J.: Corrosion199652(11)857.
