The aim of this article is to make clinicians aware of the use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) within the field of orthodontics. The paper describes five cases each one illustrating the improved diagnostic yield using CBCT over conventional radiography thus facilitating the appropriate treatment planning of patients.
PalomoJM, KauCH, PalomoLB, HansMGThree-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc2006; 72: 75–80.
2.
PopatH, DrageN, DurningPMid-line clefts of the cervical vertebrae – an incidental finding arising from cone beam computed tomography of the dental patient. Br Dent J2008; 204: 303–6.
3.
ScarfeWC, FarmanAG, SukovicPClinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc2006; 72: 75–80.
4.
SchulzeD, HeilandM, ThurmannH, AdamGRadiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol2004; 33: 83–86.
5.
Lofthag-HansenS, Thilander-KlangA, EkestubbeA, HelmrotE, GrödahlK.Calculating effective dose on a cone beam computed tomography device: 3D Accuitomo and 3D Accuitomo FPD. Dentomaxillofac Radiol2008; 37: 72–79.
6.
LudlowJB, Davies-LudlowLE, BrooksSL, HowertonWB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 219–26. Erratum in: Dentomaxillofac Radiol2006; 35: 392.
7.
RobertsJA, DrageNA, DaviesJ, ThomasDWEffective dose from cone beam computed tomography examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol, in press.
MainiA, DurningP, DrageNResorption: within or without? The benefit of cone-beam computed tomography when diagnosing a case of an internal/external resorption defect. Br Dent J2008; 204: 135–37.
17.
van der SluisIM, BootAM, VernooijM, MeradjiM, KroonAA. Idiopathic infantile arterial calcification: clinical presentation, therapy and long-term follow-up. Eur J Pediatr2006; 165: 590–93.
EricsonS, KurolJResorption of maxillary lateral incisors caused by ectopic eruption of the canines. A clinical and radiographic analysis of predisposing factors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1988; 94: 503–13.
20.
WalkerL, EncisoR, MahJThree-dimensional localization of maxillary canines with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2005; 128: 418–23.
21.
MasonC, PapadakouP, RobertsGJThe radiographic localization of impacted maxillary canines: a comparison of methods. Eur J Orthod2001; 23: 25–34.
22.
CouplandMALocalisation of misplaced maxillary canines: orthopantomograph and P.A. skull views compared. Br J Orthod1984; 11: 27–32.
23.
JacobsSGLocalization of the unerupted maxillary canine: how to and when to. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1999; 115: 314–22.
RaghoebarGM, BoeringG, VissinkAClinical, radiographic and histological characteristics of secondary retention of permanent molars. J Dent1991; 19: 164–70.
26.
SalentijnEG, RasF, MensinkG, van MerkesteynJP. The unerupted maxillary second molar, due to an overlying and malformed upper third molar: treatment and follow-up. J Orthod2008; 35: 20–24.
27.
The Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations. Vol SI 2000. London: The Stationary Office, 2000.
28.
JerroldLLitigation, legislation, and ethics. Liability regarding computerized axial tomography scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2007; 132(1): 122–24.
