Due to an increasing demand for superior aesthetics during fixed appliance treatment, the use of aesthetic brackets has grown in popularity over recent years. Although often requested by patients, aesthetic brackets are not without their disadvantages. This article presents the currently available plastic and ceramic brackets and discusses the potential problems associated with each. Recent advances, introduced by manufacturers in an attempt to overcome their clinical disadvantages, are described.
FeldnerJC, SarkarNK, SheridenJJ, LancasterDM. In vitro torque-deformation characteristics of polycarbonate brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1994; 106: 265–72.
6.
Sadat-KhonsariR, MoshtaghyA, SchelgelV, Kahl-NiekeB, MöllerM, BaussO.Torque deformation characteristics of plastic brackets: a comparative study. J Orofac Orthop2004; 65: 26–33.
7.
CacciafestaV, SfondriniMF, RicciardiA, ScribanteA, KlersyC, AuricchioFEvaluation of friction and stainless steel esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop2003; 124: 395–402.
KusyRPMorphology of polycrystalline alumina brackets and its relationship to fracture toughness and strength. Angle Orthod1988; 58: 197–203.
10.
SaundersCR, KusyRPSurface topography and frictional characteristics of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1994; 106: 605–14.
11.
KusyRPOrthodontic Biomaterials: From the Past to the Present. Angle Orthod2002; 72: 501–12.
12.
SpringateSD, WinchesterLJAn evaluation of zirconium oxide brackets: a preliminary laboratory and clinical report. Br J Orthod1991; 18: 203–9.
13.
KeithO, KusyRP, WhitleyJQZiconia brackets: an evaluation of morphology and coefficient of friction. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1994; 106: 605–14.
14.
BisharaSE, TruloveTSComparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study, part II. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1990; 98: 263–73.
WangWN, MengCL, TarngTHBond strength: a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1997; 111: 374–81.
17.
BisharaSE, FehrDE, JakobsenJRA comparative study of the debonding strengths of different ceramic brackets, enamel conditioners, and adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1993; 104: 170–9.
18.
OlsenME, BisharaSE, BoyerDB, JakobsenJREffect of varying etch times on the bond strength of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1996; 109: 403–9.
19.
MundstockKS, SadowskyPL, LacefieldW, BaeSAn in vitro evaluation of a metal reinforced orthodontic ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1999; 116: 635–41.
20.
OmanaHM, MooreRN, BagbyMDFrictional properties of metal and ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod1992; 26: 425–32.
21.
LoftusBP, ÅrtunJ, NichollsJI, AlonzoTA, StonerJA. Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movements in various bracket-arch wire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1999; 116: 336–45.
22.
ThorstensonG, KusyRInfluence of stainless steel inserts on the resistance to sliding of esthetic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states. Angle Orthod2003; 73: 167–75.
23.
AngolkarPV, KapilaS, DuncansonMG, NandaRSEvaluation of friction between ceramic brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1990; 98: 499–506.
24.
KusyRP, WhitleyJQCoefficient of friction for arch wires in stainless steel and polycrystalline alumina bracket slots I: The dry state. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1990; 98: 300–12.
25.
KusyRP, WhitleyJQ, PrewittMJComparison of the frictional coefficients for selected archwire-bracket slot combinations in the wet and dry state. Angle Orthod1991; 61: 293–302.
26.
KusyRP, WhitleyJQFriction between different wire-bracket configurations and materials. Sem Orthod1997; 3: 166–77.
27.
KusyRP, WhitleyJQFrictional resistances of metal-lined ceramic brackets versus conventional stainless steel brackets and development of 3-D frictional maps. Angle Orthod2001; 71: 364–74.
28.
NishioC, Jardim da MottaAF, EliasCN, MuchaJN. In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop2004; 125: 56–64.
29.
CacciafestaV, SfondriniMF, ScribanteA, KlersyC, AuricchioFEvaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop2003; 124: 403–409.
30.
ThorstensonJA, KusyRPResistance to sliding of orthodontic brackets with bumps in slot floors and walls: effects of second-order angulation. Dent Mater2004; 20: 881–892.
31.
DouglassJBEnamel wear cased by ceramic brackets (case report). Am J Orthod1989; 95: 96–98.
32.
VukovichME, WoodDL, DaleyTDHeat generated by grinding during removal of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1991; 99: 505–12.
33.
WinchesterLJMethods of debonding ceramic brackets. Br J Orthod1992; 19: 233–7.
34.
LamourCJ, McCabeJF, GordonPHNotching of orthodontic bonding resin to facilitate ceramic bracket debond - an ex vivo investigation. Br J Orthod1998; 25: 289–91.
35.
BisharaSE, OlsenME, VonWoldBA, JakobsenJRComparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1999; 116: 86–92.
36.
BisharaSE, OlsenME, VonWoldLEvaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1997; 112: 552–9.
37.
SheridenJ, BranleyD, HastingsJElectrothermal debracketing- Part I: an in-vitro study. Am J Orthod1986a; 89: 21–7.
38.
SheridenJ, BranleyD, HastingsJElectrothermal debracketing- Part II: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod1986b; 89: 141–5.
39.
CrooksM, HoodJ, HarknessMThermal debonding of ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1997; 111: 163–72.
40.
KrautJ, RadinS, TrowbridgeHI, EmilingRC, YankellSLClinical evaluation on thermal verses mechanical debonding of ceramic brackets. J Clin Dent1990; 2: 92–6.
41.
SernetzF, KarautJLaboratory evaluation on thermal debonding of dental brackets. J Clin Dent2001; 2: 87–91.
42.
BrounsE, SchopfP, KojancicBElectrothermal debracketing of ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Eur J Orthod1993; 15: 115–23.
43.
TaklaPM, ShivapujaPKPulpal response in electrothermal debonding. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1995; 108: 623–9.
44.
CummingsM, BiagioniP, LameyPJ, BurdenDJThermal image analysis of electrothermal debonding of ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Eur J Orthod1999; 21: 111–8.
45.
BoyerBD, EngelhardtG, BisharaSEDebonding orthodontics ceramic brackets by ultrasonic instrumentation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1995; 108: 262–6.
46.
TocchioRM, WilliamsPT, MayerFJ, StandingKGLaser debonding of ceramic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1993; 103: 155–62.
47.
AzzehE, FeldonPJLaser debonding of ceramic brackets: a comprehensive review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop2003; 123: 79–83.
48.
StroblK, BahnsTL, WillhamL, BisharaSE, StalleyWCLaser-aided debonding of orthodontic ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1992; 101: 152–8.
49.
LamourCJ, McCabeJF, GordonPHAn ex vivo investigation into the effects of chemical solvents on the debond behaviour of ceramic orthodontic brackets. Br J Orthod1998; 25: 35–9.
