This paper reports the results of a systematic investigation of residual stresses as a function of welding speed in a set of Ti–6Al–4V friction stir welds. The investigation focuses on residual stress but links these data with microstructural information derived from micrographs and hardness measurements as well as mechanical testing results. Residual stresses were determined using energy dispersive synchrotron X-ray diffraction, which allows phase specific stresses to be distinguished. The data presented in this paper demonstrate that welds with high tensile properties can be obtained, which also have relatively low peak tensile residual stress values of ∼30% of the tensile strength. The data also show a clear correlation between heat input and the width of the residual stress profile.
RomeroJ, AttallahMM, PreussM, KaradgeM, BraySE: ‘Effect of the forging pressure on the microstructure and residual stress development in Ti–6Al–4V linear friction welds’, Acta Mater., 2009, 57, 5582–5592.
2.
ThomasWM, NicholasED: ‘Friction stir welding for the transportation industries’, Mater. Des., 1997, 18, (4–6), 269–273.
3.
JohnR, JataKV, SadanandaK: ‘Residual stress effects on near-threshold fatigue crack growth in friction stir welds in aerospace alloys’, Int. J. Fatigue, 2003, 25, (9–11), 939–948.
HattinghDG, BlignaultC, van NiekerkTI, JamesMN: ‘Characterization of the influences of FSW tool geometry on welding forces and weld tensile strength using an instrumented tool’, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2008, 203, (1–3), 46–57.
7.
HattinghDG, van NiekerkTI, BlignaultC, JamesMN: ‘Analysis of the FSW force footprint and its relationship with the process parameters to optimise weld performance and tool design’, IIW J. Weld. World, 2004, 48, (1–2), 50–58.
8.
ZhouL, LiuCD, LiuP, LiuQW: ‘The stir zone microstructure and its formation mechanism in Ti–6Al–4V friction stir welds’, Scr. Metall. Mater., 2009, 61, 596–599.
9.
ZhangY, SataYS, KokawaH, ParkSHC, HiranoS: ‘Microstructural characteristics and mechanical properties of Ti–6Al–4V friction stir welds’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, A485, 448–455.
10.
ZhangY, SatoYS, KokawaH, ParkSHC, HiranoS: ‘Stir zone microstructure of commercial purity titanium friction stir welded using pcBN tool’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, A488, (1–2), 25–30.
11.
FratiniL, MicariF, BuffaG, RuisiVF: ‘A new fixture for FSW processes of titanium alloys’, CIRP Ann., 59, (1), 271–274.
12.
ZhouL, LiuHJ: ‘Effect of 0·3 wt% hydrogen addition on the friction stir welding characteristics of Ti–6Al–4V alloy and mechanism of hydrogen-induced effect’, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35, (16), 8733–8741.
13.
PilchakA, TangW, SahinerH, ReynoldsA, WilliamsJ: ‘Microstructure evolution during friction stir welding of mill-annealed Ti–6Al–4V’, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2011, 42A, (3), 745–762.
14.
QuerinJA, RubisofHA, SchneiderJA: ‘Effect of weld tool geometry on friction stir welded Ti–6Al–4V’, Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on ‘Trends in welding research 2008’, Pine Mountain, GA, USA, June 2008, ASM International, 108–112.
15.
ZhouL, LiuHJ, LiuQW: ‘Effect of process parameters on stir zone microstructure in Ti–6Al–4V friction stir welds’, J. Mater. Sci., 2010, 45, 39–45.
16.
PilchakAL, JuhasMC, WilliamsJC: ‘Microstructural changes due to friction stir processing of investment-cast Ti–6Al–4V’, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2007, 38A, 401–408.
17.
PastaS, ReynoldsAP: ‘Residual stress effects on fatigue crack growth in a Ti–6Al–4V friction stir weld’, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2008, 31, (7), 569–580.
18.
PastaS, ReynoldsAP: ‘Evaluation of residual stresses during fatigue test in an FSW joint’, Strain, 2008, 44, (2), 147–152.
19.
LiuHJ, ZhouL, LiuQW: ‘Microstructural characteristics and mechanical properties of friction stir welded joints of Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy’, Mater Des., 2009, 31, (3), 1650–1655.
20.
LutjeringG: ‘Influence of processing on microstructure and mechanical properties of (alpha+beta) titanium alloys’, Mater. Sci. Eng A, 1998, A243, (1–2), 32–45.
21.
StapletonAM, RaghunathanSL, BantounasI, StoneHJ, LindleyTC, DyeD: ‘Evolution of lattice strain in Ti–6Al–4V during tensile loading at room temperature’, Acta Mater., 2008, 56, (20), 6186–6196.
22.
PreussM, WithersPJ, MaireE, BuffiereJY: ‘SiC single fibre full-fragmentation during straining in a Ti–6Al–4V matrix studied by synchrotron X-rays’, Acta Mater., 2002, 50, (12), 3175–3190.
23.
KumarA, RabeU, ArnoldW: ‘Mapping of elastic stiffness in an α+β titanium alloy using atomic force acoustic microscopy’, Jpn J. Appl. Phys., 2008, 47, 6077.
24.
ManteF, BaranG, LucasB: ‘Nanoindentation studies of titanium single crystals’, Biomaterials, 1999, 20, 1051.
25.
SenI, RamamurtyU: ‘Elastic modulus of Ti–6Al–4V–xB alloys with B up to 0·55 wt.%’, Scr. Metall. Mater., 2010, 62, 37.
26.
FanZ: ‘On the Young's moduli of Ti–6Al–4V alloys’, Scr. Metall. Mater., 1993, 29, 1427.
27.
LarsonAC, Von DreeleRB: ‘General Structure Analysis System (GSAS)’, Report no. LAUR 86-748, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA, 1994.
28.
JonesRE, LoftusZS: ‘Friction stir welding of 5mm Ti–6Al–4V’, Proc. 6th Int. Friction Stir Symp., Saint-Sauveur, Que., Canada, October 2006, TWI, Paper 58.
29.
PeelM, SteuwerA, PreussM, WithersPJ: ‘Microstructure, mechanical properties and residual stresses as a function of welding speed in aluminium AA5083 friction stir welds’, Acta Mater., 2003, 51, (16), 4791–4801.
30.
SteuwerA, SantistebanJR, TurskiM, WithersPJ, BuslapsT: ‘High-resolution strain mapping in bulk samples using full-profile analysis of energy-dispersive synchrotron X-ray diffraction data’, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 2004, 37, 883–889.
31.
WithersPJ, PreussM, SteuwerA, PangJWL: ‘Methods for obtaining the strain-free lattice parameter when using diffraction to determine residual stress’, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 2007, 40, (5), 891–904.
32.
WithersPJ, ClarkeAP: ‘A neutron diffraction study of load partitioning in continuous Ti/Sic composites’, Acta Mater., 1998, 46, (18), 6585–6598.
33.
SteuwerA, PeelM, WithersPJ: ‘Dissimilar friction stir welds in AA5083–AA6082. The effect of process parameters on residual stress’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, A441, (1–2), 187–196.
34.
LombardH, HattinghDG, SteuwerA, JamesMN: ‘Effect of process parameters on the residual stresses in AA5083-H321 friction stir welds’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2009, A501, (1–2), 119.
35.
PeelMJ, SteuwerA, WithersPJ: ‘Dissimilar friction stir welds in AA5083–AA6082. Part II: Process parameter effects on microstructure’, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2006, 37A, (7), 2195–2206.
36.
PeelMJ, SteuwerA, WithersPJ, DickersonT, ShiQ, ShercliffH: ‘Dissimilar friction stir welds in AA5083–AA6082. Part I: Process parameter effects on thermal history and weld properties’, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2006, 37A, (7), 2183–2193.
37.
SteuwerA, BarnesSJ, AltenkirchJ, JohnsonR, WithersPJ: ‘Friction stir welding of HSLA-65 steel. Part II: The influence of weld speed and tool material on the residual stress distribution and tool wear’, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, to be published.
38.
LombardH, HattinghDG, SteuwerA, JamesMN: ‘Effect of process parameters on the residual stresses in AA5083-H321 friction stir welds’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2009, A501, (1–2), 119.
