Sociological perspectives on strategic alliances between firms are heavily influenced by economic theory. As such, they regard alliance entry, maintenance and exit decisions as following calculative rationalities concerned with the consequences for access to resources and transaction costs. Our theoretical article offers a contrasting sociological perspective whereby ‘animal spirits’ trump these calculative rationalities as factors in alliance decision making. Using Machiavelli's well-known psychological realism, we explain how ‘vulpine’ and ‘leonine’ animal spirits can shape psychological and cultural contexts for the micro-political aspects of alliance decision making.
This enables us to specify micro-political risk factors related to very common psycho-cultural differences, which we think all firms that forge alliances across cultural distance should consider.
AkerlofG. & ShillerR.2009. Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives The Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
AlvarezS. & BarneyJ.2001. How entrepreneurial firms can benefit from alliances with large partners. Academy of Management Executive, 15(1): 139–48.
3.
ArinoA. & RingP.2010. The role of fairness in alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(10): 1054–87.
4.
BakerG.GibbonsR. & MurphyK.2008. Strategic alliances: Bridges between ‘islands of conscious power’. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 22(2): 146–63.
5.
CampbellW. & FosterC.2002. Narcissism and commitment in romantic relationships: An investment model analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28: 484–95.
6.
CarterC.CleggS. R. & KornbergerM.2009. A Very Short, Interesting and Reasonably Cheap Book about Studying Strategy.London: Sage.
7.
ChenM. & HambrickD.1995. Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behaviour. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 453–82.
8.
CleggS.1989. Frameworks of Power.London: Sage.
9.
CohenW. & LevinthalD.1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128–52.
10.
CrippenT. & LopreatoJ.1989. 'Pareto's ‘The transformation of democracy’ and modern political theory. Revue Europeene des Sciences Sociales, 27: 47–86.
11.
DacinM.OliverC. & RoyJ.2007. The legitimacy of strategic alliances: An institutional perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2): 169–87.
12.
DasT. & HeI.2006. Entrepreneurial firms in search of established partners: Review and recommendations. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 12(3): 114–43.
13.
DasT. & TengB.1999a. Managing risks in strategic alliances. Academy of Management Executive, 13(4): 50–62.
14.
DasT. & TengB.1999b. Risk types and inter-firm alliance structures. Journal of Management Studies, 33(6): 827–43.
15.
DasT. & TengB.2000a. A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1): 31–61.
16.
DasT. & TengB.2000b. Instabilities of strategic alliances: An internal tensions perspective. Organisation Science, 11(1): 77–101.
17.
DasT. & TengB.2000c. A risk perception model of alliance structuring. Journal of International Management, 7 (1): 1–29.
18.
DonaldsonT. & PrestonL.1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65–91.
19.
EisenhardtK. & SchoonhovenC.1996. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects of entrepreneurial firms. Organisation Science, 7: 136–50.
20.
ForrestJ. & MartinM.1992. Strategic alliances between large and small research intensive organisations. R&D Management, 22(1): 41–53.
21.
FreedmanL.2013. Strategy: A History.New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
GamsonW.1961. A theory of coalition formation. American Sociological Review, 26(3): 373–82.
23.
Garcia-CanalE. & Sanchez-LordaP.2007. One more only if it is one of us: The number of partners and the stock market reaction to domestic and international alliance formation in EU telecom firms. International Business Review, 16(1): 83–108.
24.
GulatiR. & GargiuloM.1999. Where do interorganizational networks come from?American Journal of Sociology, 104: 1439–93.
25.
HaeusslerC.PatzeltH. & ZahraS.2012. Strategic alliances and product development in high technology new firms: The moderating effect of technological capabilities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2): 217–33.
26.
HuberJ. & GabelM.2000. Putting parties in their place: Inferring party left-right ideological positions from party manifestos data. American Journal of Political Science, 44: 94–103.
27.
JudgeW. & DooleyR.2006. Strategic alliance outcomes: A transaction-cost economics perspective. British Journal of Management, 17: 23–37.
28.
KaleP. & SinghH.2007. Building firm capabilities through learning: The role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10): 981–1000.
29.
KaleP.DyerJ. & SinghH.2002. Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8): 747–67.
30.
KeynesJ. M.1936. The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money.London: Macmillan.
31.
KimJ. & HigginsM.2007. Where do alliances come from? The effects of upper echelons on alliance formation. Research Policy, 36(4): 499–514.
32.
Langfield-SmithK.2008. The relations between transactional characteristics, trust and risk in the start-up phase of a collaborative alliance. Management Accounting Research, 19(4): 344–64.
33.
LeeK.LimG. & TanS.2000. Feasibility of strategic alliance as an entry strategy into markets dominated by major competitors. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 7(1): 43–57.
34.
LiY. & LiaoX.2007. Decision support for risk analysis on dynamic alliance. Decision Support Systems, 42(4): 2043–59.
35.
de ManA. & RoijakkersN.2009. Alliance governance: Balancing control and trust in dealing with risk. Long Range Planning, 42(1): 75–95.
36.
MarciukaityteD.RoskelleyK. & WangH.2009. Strategic alliances by financial services firms. Journal of Business Research, 62(11): 1193–99.
37.
MarshallA.2007. Vilfredo Pareto's Sociology: A Framework for Political Psychology.Aldershot: Ashgate.
38.
MarshallA. & OjiakoU.2013. Managing Risk through the Veil of Ignorance. Journal of Risk Research, 16(10): 1225–39.
39.
MartinW. & VanbergG.2003. Wasting time? The impact of ideology and size on delay in coalition formation. British Journal of Political Science, 33(2): 323–32.
40.
Mellat-ParastM. & DigmanL.2008. Learning: The interface of quality management and strategic alliances. International Journal of Production Economics, 114(2): 820–29.
41.
MintzbergH.1996. Musings on management. Harvard Business Review, 74(4): 61–65.
42.
MorganG. & KristensenP. H.2006. The contested social space of multinationals: Varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism. Human Relations, 59: 1467–90.
MudambiR. & SwiftT.2014. Knowing when to leap: Transitioning between exploitative and explorative R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1): 126–45.
45.
MurrayJ. & KotabeM.2005. Performance implications of strategic fit between alliance attributes and alliance forms. Journal of Business Research, 58(11): 1525–33.
46.
NielsenB.2005. The role of knowledge embeddedness in the creation of synergies in strategic alliances. Journal of Business Research, 58(9): 1194–204.
47.
NielsenB.2010. Strategic fit, contractual, and procedural governance in alliances. Journal of Business Research, 63(7): 682–89.
48.
NielsenB. & GuderganS.2012. Exploration and exploitation fit and performance in international strategic alliances. International Business Review, 21(4): 558–74.
RifkinJ.2000. The Age of Access: How the Shift from Ownership to Access is Transforming Capitalism.London: Penguin.
55.
SegersJ.1993. Strategic partnering between new technology-based firms and large established firms in the biotechnology and micro-electronics industries in Belgium. Small Business Economics, 5(4): 271–81.
56.
ShahR. & SwaminathanV.2008. Actors influencing partner selection in strategic alliances: The moderating role of alliance context. Strategic Management Journal, 29(5): 471–94.
57.
ShepardP.1998. Thinking Animals: Animals and the Development of Human Intelligence.Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
58.
StuartT.1998. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 668–98.
59.
TsangE.1998. Motives for strategic alliances: A resource-based perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 14(3): 207–21.
60.
Van LangeP.RusbultC.DrigotasS.ArriagaX.WitcherB. & CoxC.1997. Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72: 1373–95.
61.
YamakawaY.YangH. & LinZ.2011. Exploration versus exploitation in alliance portfolios: Performance implications of organisational, strategic, and environmental fit. Research Policy, 40(2): 287–96.
62.
YasudaH.2005. Formation of strategic alliances in high-technology industries: Comparative study of the resource-based theory and the transaction-cost theory. Technovation, 25(7): 763–70.
63.
YoungM.AhlstromD.BrutonG. & RubanikY.2011. What do firms from transition economies want from their strategic alliance partners?Business Horizons, 54(2): 163–74.
64.
ZuckermanA.1979. The Politics of Faction: Christian Democrat Rule in Italy.New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
