Viewing delocalization as a fairly complex phenomenon affecting firms, sectors, regions and countries, this study aims at analysing the various interconnections between delocalization and development. To do so, we have developed an elaborate conceptual framework where upgrading and embeddedness are pivotal. Viewing development as a product of firm or network strategies and actions, assets and institutions, we find firms involved in delocalization to have benefited. On the other hand, delocalization often implies a weakening of linkages in the home economy, while the transfer of knowledge and other intangible assets is often non-existent. Moreover, our framework allows for more macroscopic assessments, where outcomes are products of complex processes involving quite unique factors, such as history, civil society and policies.
AgarwalJ.P.1997. Effect of Foreign Direct Investment on Employment in Home Countries. Transnational Corporations, 6(2): 1–28.
2.
ArndtS.W.1998. Super-specialization and the Gains from Trade. Contemporary Economic Policy, XVI: 480–485.
3.
BelderbosR.A.SleuwaegenL.1998. Tariff Jumping DFI and Export Substitution: Japanese Electronics Firms in Europe. International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 16: 601–638.
4.
BelderbosR.A.CapannelliG.FukaoK.2001. Backward Vertical Linkages of Foreign Manufacturing Affiliates: Evidence from Japanese Multinationals. World Development, 29(1): 189–208.
5.
BlomströmM.KokkoA.1995. Home Country Effects of Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from Sweden. NBER Working Paper No. 4639. NBER.
6.
BlomströmM.KokkoA.1998. Multinational Corporations and Spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(3): 247.
7.
CoeN.M.HessM.YeungH.W.DickenP.HendersonJ.2004. Globalizing Regional Development: A Global Production Networks Perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(4): 468–484.
8.
CrespoN.FontouraM.P.2007. Determinant Factors of FDI Spillovers — What Do We Really Know?World Development, 35(3): 410–425.
9.
EggerH.EggerP.2001. Cross-border Sourcing and Outward Processing in EU Manufacturing. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 12: 243–256.
10.
FeenstraR.C.HansonG.H.1996. Foreign Investment, Outsourcing and Relative Wages. In: FeenstraR. C.GrossmanG. M.IrwinD. A., eds. The Political Economy of Trade Policy: Papers in Honor of Jagdish Bhagwati. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 89–127.
11.
GereffiG.1999. International Trade and Industrial Upgrading in the Apparel Commodity Chain. Journal of International Economics, 48: 37–70.
12.
GereffiG.KorzeniewiczM.1994. Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
13.
GlassA.J.SaggiK.2001. Innovation and Wage Effects of International Outsourcing. European Economic Review, 45: 67–86.
14.
GörgH.StroblE.2001. Multinational Companies and Productivity Spillovers: A Meta-Analysis. Economic Journal, 111(475): 723–739.
15.
GwosdzK.DomanskiB.2008. +Social Consequences of Delocalization in Labour-intensive Industries: The Experience of Old and New Members of the EU. In: LabrianidisL., ed. The Moving Frontier: The Changing Geography of Production in Labour-intensive Industries. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 101–122.
16.
HeadK.RiesJ.2001. Overseas Investment and Firm Exports. Review of International Economics, 9(1): 108–122.
17.
HendersonJ.DickenP.HessM.CoeN.YeungH. W.2002. Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy, 9(3): 436–464.
18.
HumphreyJ.SchmitzH.2000. Governance and Upgrading: Linking Industrial Cluster and Global Value Chain Research (Working Paper 120). IDS Working Papers, University of Sussex, Institute of Development Studies.
19.
HumphreyJ.SchmitzH.2002. How Does Insertion in Global Value Chains Affect Upgrading in Industrial Clusters?Regional Studies, 36(9): 1017–1027.
20.
JonesR.W.KierzkowskiH.2001. Globalization and the Consequences of International Fragmentation. In: DornbuschR.CalvoG. A.ObstfeldM., eds. Money, Factor Mobility, and Trade: The Festschrift in Honor of Robert A. Mundell. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
KalogeresisA.LabrianidisL.2008. Delocalisation and Development in Europe: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Findings. In: LabrianidisL., ed. The Moving Frontier: The Changing Geography of Production in Labour-intensive Industries. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 23–58.
22.
KamarasA.2001. A Capitalist Diaspora: The Greeks in the Balkans (Discussion Paper 4). London School of Economics and Political Science, Hellenic Observatory, The European Institute.
23.
KaplinskyR.1998. Globalisation, Industrialisation and Sustainable Growth: The Pursuit of the Nth Rent (IDS Discussion Paper 365). University of Sussex, Institute of Development Studies.
24.
KohlerW.2001. A Specific-factors View on Outsourcing. North American Journal of Economics & Finance, 12(1): 31.
25.
KravisI.B.LipseyR.E.1982. Location of Overseas Production. Journal of International Economics, 12: 201–223.
26.
KuglerM.2006. Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment: Within or Between Industries?Journal of Development Economics, 80(2): 444–477.
27.
LabrianidisL.2000. Are Greek Companies that Invested in the Balkans in the 1990s transnational companies? In: MitsosA.MossialosE., eds. Contemporary Greece and Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 457–482.
28.
LabrianidisL.KalantaridisC.2004. The Delocalization of Production in Labour Intensive Industries: Instances of Triangular Manufacturing between Germany, Greece and FYROM. European Planning Studies, 12(8): 1157–1173.
29.
LabrianidisL.DomanskiB.KalantaridisC.KilvitsK.RoukovaP. eds. 2007. The changing geography of production in labor intensive industries: The moving frontier (MOVE). Project final report, European Commission FP6-CITIZENS Project (PL 001695). Available at: <http://econlab.uom.gr/∼move/images/stories/reports/final_report.pdf> [Accessed 14 January 2008].
30.
LipseyR.E.WeissM.Y.1981. Foreign Production and Exports in Manufacturing Industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 63: 488–494.
31.
LipseyR.E.WeissM.Y.1984. Foreign production and exports of individual firms. Review of Economics and Statistics, 66: 304–308.
32.
LiuW.DickenP.2006. Transnational Corporations and ‘Obligated’ Embeddedness: Foreign Direct Investment in China's Automobile Industry. Environment and Planning A, 38(7): 1229–1247.
33.
RantisiN.M.2004. The Ascendance of New York Fashion. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(1): 86–106.
34.
RobertsM.J.TyboutJ.R.1995. An Empirical Model of Sunk Costs and the Decision to Export. World Bank, International Economics Department, International Trade Division.
35.
SacchettiS.SugdenR.2003. The Governance of Networks and Economic Power: The Nature and Impact of Subcontracting Relationships. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(5): 669–692.
36.
SchmitzH.KnorringaP.1999. Learning from Global Buyers (IDS Working Paper 100). IDS Working Papers. University of Sussex, Institute of Development Studies.
37.
StorperM.1997. The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy. New York: Guilford Press.
38.
SvenssonR.1996. Effects of Overseas Production on Home Country Exports: Evidence Based on Swedish Multinationals. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 132(2): 304–329.
39.
UzziB.1997. Social Structure and Competition In Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 35–67.
40.
WagnerJ.2007. Exports and Productivity: A Survey of the Evidence from Firm-level Data. World Economy, 30(1): 60–82.
41.
YamamuraE.SonobeT.OtsukaK.2003. Human Capital, Cluster Formation, and International Relocation: The Case of the Garment Industry in Japan, 1968–98. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1): 37–56.
