This article analyses the origins of the methodological nationalism that characterizes the new developmental economics by examining Friedrich List's work. It argues that the international sphere had a primary importance in political economy from the sixteenth century onwards, and that classical political economists elaborated, although contradictorily, elements of a theory of uneven and combined development. List reinforced a vision of development as non-antagonistic, invoking extra-economic factors in order to present late industrialization as beneficial for the nation as a whole. Affirming the centrality of labour, Marx's critique of List offers deep insights into the political economy of development.
AmsdenA.1990. South Korea's record wage rates: Labor in late industrialization. Industrial Relations, 29(1): 77–93.
2.
AndersonK.B.2010. Marx at the Margins.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
ByresT.1996. Capitalism from Above and Capitalism from Below: An Essay in Comparative Political Economy.Basingstoke: Macmillan.
4.
CallinicosA.2007. Does capitalism need the state system?Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 20(4): 533–49.
5.
ChangD.-J.2009. Capitalist Development in Korea: Labour, Capital, and the Myth of the Developmental State.London: Routledge.
6.
ChangH.-J.2002. Kicking Away the Ladder: Economic Strategy in Historical Perspective.London: Anthem.
7.
ClementA.2006. English and French mercantilist thought and the matter of colonies during the 17th century. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 54(3): 291–323.
8.
FernbachD.2010. The Revolutions of 1848: Karl Marx — Introduction.London and New York: Verso.
9.
FerrierF.L.A. [1805] 1822. Du gouvernement considere dans ses rapports avec le commerce, 3rd edn.Paris and Lille: Pélicer & Danel.
10.
FineB.2006. The developmental state and the political economy of development. In: FineB. & JomoK.S., eds. The New Development Economics: After the Washington Consensus.New Delhi: Tulika, pp. 101–22.
11.
FineB. & Van WaeyenbergeE.2013. A paradigm shift that never was: Justin Lin's new structural economics. Competition & Change, 17(4): 355–71.
12.
GerschenkronA.1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
GoreC.1996. Methodological nationalism and the misunderstanding of East Asian industrialization. European Journal of Development Research, 8(1): 77–122.
14.
HarveyD.2003. The New Imperialism.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
HobsonJ.M.2012. Part 1 — Revealing the Eurocentric foundations of IPE: A critical historiography of the discipline from the classical to the modern era. Review of International Political Economy, 20(5): 1–30.
17.
HoselitzB.F.1960. Theories of stages of economic growth. In HoselitzB.F., ed. Theories of Economic Growth.Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
18.
JomoK.S. ed. 2005. The Pioneers of Development Economics: Great Economists on Development.London and New York: Zed Books.
19.
KahnS.R. & ChristiansenJ., (eds.) 2011. Towards New Developmentalism: Market as Means Rather Than Master.New York and Oxon, CA: Routledge.
20.
KohliA.2004. State-directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
LallS.1991. Building Industrial Competitiveness in Developing Countries.Paris: OECD Development Centre.
22.
Levi-FaurD.1997. Economic nationalism: From Friedrich List to Robert Reich. Review of International Studies, 23(3): 359–70.
23.
van der LindenM.. 2008. Workers of the World: Essays toward a Global Labor History.Leiden and Boston: Brill.
24.
ListF.1904. The National System of Political Economy.London: Longman.
MarxK.1973. Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (rough draft), trans. Nicolaus. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
27.
MarxK.1975. Draft of an article on Friedrich List's book Das Nationale System der Politischen Oekonomie. In: MarxK. & EngelsF., Collected Works, Vol. 4. Moscow: Progress Publisher.
28.
PatnaikP.2005. Karl Marx as developmental economist. In: JomoK.S., ed. The Pioneers of Development Economics: Great Economists on Development.London and New York: Zed Books, pp. 62–73.
29.
PerrottaC.1991. Is the mercantilist theory of the favourable balance of trade really erroneous?History of Political Economy, 23(2): 301–36.
30.
PerrottaC.1993. Early Spanish mercantilism: The first analysis of under-development. In MagnussonL., ed. Mercantilist Economics.Boston: Kluwer, pp. 17–58.
31.
PradellaL.2010. Beijing between Smith and Marx. Historical Materialism, 18: 88–109.
32.
ReinertE.S. ed. 2004. Globalization, Economic Development and Inequality: An Alternative Perspective.Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
33.
RicardoD. [1817] 2004. The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Edited by Piero Sraffa, Volume I: On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation.Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
34.
SchumpeterJ.A.1954. History of Economic Analysis.New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
SelwynB.2009. A historical materialist appraisal of Friedrich List and his modern day followers. New Political Economy, 14(2): 157–80.
36.
SemmelB.1978. The Rise of Free Trade Imperialism.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
ShafaeddinM.2005. Friederich List and the infant industry argument. In JomoK.S., ed. The Pioneers of Development Economics: Great Economists on Development.London and New York: Zed Books, pp. 42–61.
38.
ShaikhA.1979. Foreign trade and the law of value, Part I. Science and Society, 43: 281–302.
39.
SmithA. [1776] 1961. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, 2 vols.Frome and London: Butler & Tanner.
40.
SongH.-Y.2010. The developmental state and the neoliberal transition in South Korea. In: Saad-FilhoA. & YalmanG.L., eds. Economic Transition to Neoliberalism in Middle-income Countries.London and New York: Routledge.
41.
SzentesT.2005. Development in the history of economics. In JomoK.S. & ReinertE.S., eds. The Origins of Development Economics: How Schools of Economic Thought Have Addressed Development.London and New York: Tulika Books, pp. 146–58.
42.
SzporlukR.1988. Communism and Nationalism: Karl Marx versus Friedrich List.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
TrebilcockC.1981. The Industrialisation of the Continental Powers, 1780–1914.London: Longman.
44.
WadeR.2004. Governing the Market, 2nd edn.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
WatsonM.2012. Friedrich List's Adam Smith historiography and the contested origins of development theory. Third World Quarterly, 33(3): 459–74.
46.
WeissL.1998. The Myth of the Powerless State.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
