Over recent decades, the political economy of the European Union has been marked by the emergence of a European financial capitalism and various processes of financialization. This article aims to explore the constitutive role of political strategies, decisions and conflicts in these developments, in particular with regard to ongoing European crises tendencies. For this purpose, it draws on a neo-Gramscian and regulationist conceptual framework which differentiates between three levels of analysis: that of a ‘historic bloc’ or specific societal formation; a ‘hegemonic bloc’ or particular alliance of leading social forces; and ‘political projects’, which are problem- or crisis-induced political initiatives. The article shows that in the course of the crisis the major political projects have been initiated or controlled by a finance-dominated transnational alliance. In this sense, European financial capitalism and financialization have been politically promoted and stabilized, so far. At the same time, however, the article also identifies increasing political contradictions and conflicts which indicate the precarious nature of past stabilization attempts.
AgliettaM.1979. A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The US Experience.London: NLB.
2.
AgliettaM.2000. Ein neues Akkumulationsregime. Die Regulationstheorie auf dem Prüfstand.Hamburg: VSA.
3.
AgliettaM.2012. The European vortex. New Left Review, 75: 15–36.
4.
AltvaterE.2010. Der große Krach.Muenster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
5.
BakerA.2010. Restraining regulatory capture? Anglo-America, crisis politics and trajectories of change in global financial governance. International Affairs, 86(3): 647–63.
6.
BeckerJ. & JägerJ.2012. Integration in crisis: A regulationist perspective on the interaction of European varieties of capitalism. Competition & Change, 16(3): 169–87.
7.
BellofioreR.GaribaldoF. & HaleviJ.2010. The great recession and the contradictions of European neomercantilism. In: PanitchL.AlboG. and ChibberV., eds. Socialist Register 2011: The Crisis This Time.London: Merlin Press, pp. 120–46.
8.
BielingH.-J.2003. Social forces in the making of the new European economy: The case of financial market integration. New Political Economy, 8(2): 203–24.
9.
BielingH.-J.2011. Vom Krisenmanagement zur neuen Konsolidierungsagenda der EU. Prokla, 41(2): 173–94.
10.
BohleD.2011. An elusive region: East-Central Europe in the crisis. Perspectives on Europe, 41(2): 34–39.
11.
BräuningerD. & SteimerH.2011. Revenue, Competition, Growth: Potential for Privatisation in the Euro Area.Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bank Research.
12.
BruffI.2011. What about the elephant in the room? Varieties of capitalism, varieties in capitalism. New Political Economy, 16(4): 481–500.
13.
BruffI. & HornL.2012. Varieties of capitalism in crisis?Competition & Change, 16(3): 161–68.
14.
CafrunyA.W. & RynerM.2007. Europe at Bay: In the Shadow of US Hegemony.Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
CoxR.W.1983. Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. Millennium, 12(2): 162–75.
18.
DannreutherC.2006. Regulation theory and the EU. Competition & Change, 10(2): 180–99.
19.
DeutschmannC.2011. Limits to financialization: Sociological analyses of the financial crisis. European Journal of Sociology, 52(3): 347–89.
20.
EngelenE.2011. After the Great Complacence: Financial Crisis and the Politics of Reform.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
EpsteinG.A.2005. Introduction. In: EpsteinG. A., ed. Financialization and the World Economy.London: Edward Elgar.
22.
European Commission.2011a. Facts and Figures on State Aid in the EU Member States. Commission Staff Working Paper, Autumn. Update, Brussels, 1.12.2011, SEC(2011) 1487 final. Luxemburg: European Commission.
23.
European Commission.2011b. Public Finances in EMU — 2011. European Economy, No. 3. Luxemburg: European Commission.
24.
European Commission.2012. Public Finances in EMU — 2012. European Economy No. 4. Luxemburg: European Commission.
25.
FosterJ.B.2007. The financialization of capitalism. Monthly Review, 58(11): 1–12.
26.
FosterJ.B. & HollemanH.2010. The financial power elite. Monthly Review, 62(1): 1–19.
27.
GillS.1998. European governance and new constitutionalism: Economic and monetary union and alternatives to disciplinary neoliberalism in Europe. New Political Economy, 3(1): 5–26.
28.
GillS.2011. Organic crisis, global leadership and progressive alternatives. In: GillS., ed. Global Crisis and the Crisis of Global Leadership.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 233–54.
29.
GowanP.1999. The Global Gamble: Washington's Faustian Bid for World Dominance.London and New York: Verso.
30.
HallS.1986. Gramsci's relevance for the study of race and ethnicity. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10(5): 5–27.
31.
LannooK.2011. The EU's Response to the Financial Crisis: A Mid-term Review.CEPS Policy Brief, No. 241, April.
32.
LapavitsasC.2012. Crisis in the Eurozone.London: Verso.
33.
de LarosièreJ.2009. Report from the High-level Group on Supervision in the EU, 25 February. Brussels: European Union.
34.
LehndorffS. ed. 2012. A Triumph of Failed Ideas: European Models of Capitalism in Crisis.Brussels: ETUI.
35.
LipietzA.2001. The fortunes and misfortunes of post-Fordism. In: AlbrittonR., eds. Phases of Capitalist Development: Booms, Crises and Globalizations.Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 17–35.
36.
MacartneyH.2009. Variegated neo-liberalism: Transnationally oriented fractions of capital in EU financial market integration. Review of International Studies, 35(2): 451–80.
37.
MacartneyH.2011. Finance unravelled: A historical materialist analysis of EU public policy. Competition & Change, 15(1): 47–70.
MüggeD.2006. Reordering the marketplace: Competition politics in European finance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(5): 991–1022.
41.
OverbeekH.2012. Sovereign debt crisis in Euroland: Root causes and implications for European integration. International Spectator, 47(1): 30–48.
42.
PetersJ.2011. The rise of finance and the decline of organised labour in the advanced capitalist countries. New Political Economy, 16(1): 73–99.
43.
PosnerE.2010. Is a European approach to financial regulation emerging from the crisis? In: HelleinerE.PagliariS. and ZimmermannH., eds. Global Finance in Crisis: The Politics of International Regulatory Change.London: Routledge, pp. 108–20.
44.
QuagliaL.2012. The regulatory response of the European Union: The case of hedge fund regulation. In: MayntzR., ed. Crisis and Control: Institutional Changes in Financial Market Regulation.Frankfurt am Main: Campus, pp. 171–95.
45.
RowellA.2010. Banking on the bankers — regulation and the financial crisis. In: Alter-EU, ed. Bursting the Brussels Bubble.Brussels: Alter-EU, pp. 87–93.
TrostA.2011. Das Kasino bleibt geöffnet. Die Regulierung der Finanzmärkte und was daraus geworden ist. Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik, 56(2): 75–84.
48.
van. RietA. ed. 2010. Euro Area Fiscal Policies and the Crisis. ECB Occasional Paper Series, No. 109, April. Frankfurt am Main: ECB.
