A significant number of underground hard rock mines have to struggle to maintain and keep operational excavations in squeezing ground conditions. This can often result in considerable investment in rock reinforcement and support and in time‐consuming and possibly hazardous scaling and rehabilitation. The LaRonde Mine in Canada has reported squeezing conditions in geological conditions ranging from weak to hard rock. This paper reports on the development of a ‘Hard Rock Squeezing Index’ based on case studies reported from several mining operations and calibrated based on in situ observations from the LaRonde Mine. The Hard Rock Squeezing Index is based on the foliation spacing of the rock mass and the stress to intact rock strength ratio. This index further incorporates the influence of excavation orientation with regard to structure in order to provide an indicator of squeezing potential.
AydanÖ, AkagiT, KawamotoT1996. The squeezing potential of rock around tunnels: theory and prediction with examples taken from Japan.Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 29, (3), 125–143.
2.
BarlaG2002. Tunneling under squeezing rock conditions, Adv. Geotech. Eng. Tunn., 5, 169–268.
3.
BarlaG., BoniniM, DebernardiD2007. Modelling of tunnels in squeezing rock, Proc. 3rd Iranian Rock Mech. Conf., Tehran, Iran, October 2007, Iranian Society for Rock Mechanics, 1267–1285.
4.
BartonN, LienR, LundeJ1974. Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel supports, Rock Mech., 6, (4), 189–239.
5.
BeckD, KassbohmS, PutzarG2010. Multi‐scale simulation of ground support designs for extreme tunnel closure, in Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. on ‘Block and sublevel caving’, (ed. , PotvinY, ed), 441–454, Perth, AustralianCentre for Geomechanics.
6.
BeckDA, SandyMP2003. Mine Sequencing for high recovery in western australian mines, Proc. 12th Int. Symp. on ‘Mine planning and equipment selection’, April 2003, Kalgoorlie, Australia, AusIMM, 137–144.
7.
BeerG, MeekJL, CowlingR1981. Prediction of behaviour of shale hangingwalls in deep underground excavations, Proc. 5th Int. Cong. on ‘Rock mechanics’, Vol. 2, D45–51, Rotterdam, Balkema.
8.
EinsteinHH1996. Tunnelling in difficult ground – swelling behaviour and identification of swelling rocks, Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 29, (3), 113–124.
9.
HoekE, MarinosP2000. Predicting tunnel squeezing problems in weak heterogeneous rock masses, Tunnels Tunn. Int., 32, (11), 45–51.
10.
HsuSC, ChiangSS, LaiJr. 2004. Failure mechanisms of tunnels in weak rock with interbedded structures, Proc. SINOROCK2004 Symp: ‘Rock characterization, modelling and engineering design methods’, Yangtze River, China, May 2004, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 41, (3), 2B–34.
11.
JohnstonW1993. Soft rock engineering, in Comprehensive rock engineering, Vol. 1, 367–393, Oxford, UK, Pergamon Press.
12.
KazakidisVN2002. Confinement effects and energy balance analyses for buckling failure under eccentric loading conditions, Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 35, (2), 115–126.
13.
KleinS2001. An approach to the classification of weak rock for tunnel projects, in Proc. Rapid Excavation and Tunn. Conf., San Diego, CA, USA, June 2001, SME, 793–805.
14.
KontogianniV, TzortzisA, StirosS2004. Deformation and failure of the Tymfristos Tunnel, Greece, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., ASCE, 30, (10), 1004–1013.
15.
LinY, HongY, ZhengS, ZhangY1984. Failure modes of openings in a steeply bedded rock mass, Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 17, 113–119.
16.
Mercier‐LangevinF2005. Projet de convergence des galeries – Phase 1: consolidation de l'information disponible à la mine, Internal Memo, Agnico‐Eagle Mines Ltd – LaRonde Division, Cadillac, Canada, 13 p.
17.
Mercier‐LangevinF, TurcotteP2007aExpansion at depth at Agnico‐Eagle's LaRonde Division – meeting geotechnical challenges without compromising production objectivesin Challenges in deep and high stress mining, PotvinY, ), Chapter 21, 189–195, Perth, AustralianCentre for Geomechanics.
18.
Mercier‐LangevinF, TurcotteP2007bEvolution of ground support practices at Agnico Eagle's LaRonde Division innovative solutions to high stress yielding groundin Proc. 1st Canada–US Rock Mech. Symp.: Rock Mechanics – meeting society's challenges and demands, EberhardtE, ), 1497–1504, Vancouver, Taylor & Francis.
19.
PanetM1996. Two case histories of tunnel through squeezing rocks, Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 29, (3), 155–164.
20.
PotvinY, HadjigeorgiouJ2008. Ground support strategies to control large deformations in mining excavations, J. Southern Afr. Inst. Min. Metall., 108, 393–400.
21.
RussoG1994. Some considerations on the applicability of major geomechanical classifications to weak and complex rocks in Tunnelling, Geoingegneria Ambientale e Mineraria, no. 82, 63–70.
22.
SinghB, JethwaJL, DubeAK, SinghB1992. Correlation between observed support pressure and rock mass quality, Tunn. Underground Space Technol., 7, 59–74.
23.
SteinerW1996. Tunnelling in squeezing rocks: case histories, Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 29, (4), 211–246.
24.
StruthersMA, TurnerMH, McNabbK, JenkinsPA2000. Rock mechanics design and practice for squeezing ground and high stress conditions at perseverance mine, Proc. MassMin 2000, (ed. , ChitomboG, ed), 755–764, Melbourne, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
25.
TylerDB, WernerM2004. A case study of ground support improvement at Perseverance Mine, in Proc. 5th Int. Symp. on ‘Ground support, ground support in mining and underground construction’, (ed. , VillaescusaE, PotvinY, ed), 53–63, London, A. A. Balkema Publishers.
26.
WangC, WangY, LuS2000. Deformational behaviour of roadways in soft rocks in underground coal mines and principles for stability control, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 37, 937–946.
27.
YassaghiA, Salari‐RadH2005. Squeezing rock conditions at an igneous contact zone in the Taloun tunnels, Tehran‐Shomal freeway, Iran: a case study, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 42, (1), 95–108.
