Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper investigates readily incorporable improvements to the identification of squeezing ground conditions and the determination of the depth of movement for Mount Isa Copper Operations’ Northern 3500 (MICO N3500) orebody. Numerical modelling using the boundary element method (BEM) indicated that the current use of elastic material properties to calculate the rockwall condition factor and predict tunnel squeezing is appropriate, as no apparent benefit was gained by employing elastoplastic material properties or including the tunnel void geometry. Further analysis using the finite element method indicated that complex, large-scale models would be required to make meaningful improvement on the elastic BEM model. However, due to large time and computational overheads such models are not practical within the site's engineering workflow. In conjunction with numerical modelling, a prototype monitoring device was also developed to address the problem of rigid instrument shear and inspection camera obstruction when determining the depth of movement in a squeezing rockmass. The reverse downhole probe device will allow distance measurement and a live video feed to be returned to the excavation surface by taking advantage of stable ground beyond the excavation zone of influence and using a thin, flexible cable to transmit power and data.

Keywords

Squeezing ground Tunnel convergence Deep hard rock mining Instrumentation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beck

and Sandy

2003. Mine sequencing for high recovery in Western Australian mines, in Proceedings12th International Symposium on Mine Planning and Equipment Selection, 137–144, Kalgoorlie.

Brady

and Brown

2004. Rock mechanics for underground mining, 217–221, 419–427, Dordrecht, Springer.

Butler

2014. Further application of the RCF model for N3500 squeeze ground, Mt Isa, Mount Isa Copper Operations, Internal report.

Einstein

1996. Tunneling in difficult ground – swelling behaviour and identification of swelling rocks, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 29, (3), 113–124.10.1007/BF01032649

Hartman

and Handley

2001. The application of the Q tunnelling quality index to rock mass assessment at impala platinum mine, MSc thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.

Hoek

and Marinos

2000. Predicting tunnel squeezing problems in weak heterogeneous rock masses, Tunnels & Tunnelling International, 1–22. http://www.rocscience.com.3pdns.korax.net/hoek/references/H2000d.pdf

Hudson

and Harrison

1997. Engineering rock mechanics an introduction to the principles, 324, Oxford, Elsevier Science.

Jager

and Ryder

1999. A handbook on rock engineering practice for tabular and hard rock mines, 216–221, Braamfontein, Safety in Mines Research Advisory Committee.

Kavvadas

2005. Monitoring ground deformation in tunnelling: current practice in transportation tunnels, Engineering Geology, 79, 93–113.10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.10.011

10.

Kazakidis

2002. Confinement effects and energy balance analyses for buckling failure under eccentric loading conditions, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 35, (2), 115–126.10.1007/s006030200015

11.

Klein

2001. An approach to the classification of weak rock for tunnel projects, in Proceedings Rapid Excavation and Tunnelling Conference, 793–805, New York.

12.

Mercier-Langevin

and Hadjigeorgiou

2010. Towards a better understanding of squeezing potential in hard rock mines, in Proceedings 5th International Seminar on Deep and High Stress Mining (eds. Van Sint Jan

and Potvin

), 142–153, Perth, Australian Centre for Geomechanics.

13.

Mine Design Technologies (MDT) 2014. Personal communication, 3 November 2014.

14.

Norlund

2013. Deep hard rock mining and rock mechanics challenges, in Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction (eds. Potvin

and Brady

), 39–56, Perth, Australian Centre for Geomechanics.

15.

Potvin

and Hadjigeorgiou

2008. Ground support strategies to control large deformations in mining excavations, in Proceedings 6th International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Civil Engineering Construction, 393–400, Cape Town, Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.

16.

Russo

1994. Some considerations on the applicability of major geomechanical classification to weak and complex rocks in tunneling [online]. Available from: http://www.webalice.it/giordandue/newweak.pdf (Accessed 12 May 2014).

17.

Vardeman

and Jobe

2001. Basic engineering data collection and analysis, 402–407, Pacific Grove, CA, Duxbury.

18.

Wang

, Wang

and Lu

2000. Deformational behaviour of roadways in soft rocks in underground coal mines and principles for stability control, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 37, 937–946.10.1016/S1365-1609(00)00026-5

19.

Wiles

2006. Reliability of numerical modelling predictions, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 43, 454–472.10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.08.001

20.

Wiles

2007. Evidence based model calibration for reliable predictions [online], in 4th International Seminar on Deep and High Stress Mining, 3–20. Available from: http://www.map3d.com/default.htm (Accessed 12 December 2013).

21.

Wiseman

1979. A study of the factors affecting the design and support of gold mine tunnels, Chamber of Mines Research Organisation, Research report No. 50/78, Johannesburg.

Improvement of squeezing ground prediction and monitoring capabilities for Mount Isa Mines Northern 3500 orebody

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References