In this paper, fundamental concepts of ultrasonics and characteristics of distinctive microstructures have been used to simply explain the effect of microstructure on the attenuation mechanism of ultrasonic waves in carbon steels. In addition, it has been shown that application of the second medium hardness instead of the bulk hardness is more appropriate to correlate the sound velocity and the microstructure.
Gut-C. H. and TuncerB. O.: Mater. Charact., 2005, 55, 160–166.
2.
PrasadR. and KumarS.: Insight Br. J. NDT, 1991, 33, 506–508.
3.
BoudaB. A., BenchaalaA. and AlemK.: Ultrasonics, 2000, 38, 224–227.
4.
PapadakisE. P.: Metall. Trans. A, 1970, 1A, 1053–1057.
5.
Murav'evV. V.‘Interrelationship of the velocity of an ultrasonic wave in steels and their heat treat cycles’, 135-137; 1989, New York, Plenum Publishing Corp.
6.
PrasadR. and KumarS.: J. Mater. Process. Technot, 1994, 42, 51–59.
7.
Gut-C. H. and KelqY.: Insight Br. J. NDT, 2003, 45, 615–620.
8.
‘ASM handbook’, Vol. 17, ‘Nondestructive evaluation and quality control’, 231; 1999, Materials Park, OH, ASM.
9.
SmithR. L., RusbridgeK. L., ReynoldsW. N. and HudsonB.: Mater. Eval., 1982, 41, 218–222.
10.
KopecB. and HanakV.: NDT Int., 1989, 22, 21–25.
11.
KlinmanR., WebsterG. R., MarshF. J. and StephensonE. T.: Mater. Eval., 1980, 38, 26–32.
12.
KlinmannR. and StephensonE. T.: Mater. Eval., 1981, 39, 1116–1120.
13.
ReitingerB., BererT., HelmO. and BurgholzerP.: Proc. 1st Int. Symp. on ‘Laser ultrasonics: science, technology and applications’, July 2008, Montreal, Canada.
14.
SmithW. F.: ‘Structure and properties of engineering alloys’, 24–38; 1981, New York, McGraw-Hill Inc.
15.
VasudevanE., PalanichamyP. and VenkadesanS.: Scr. Metall. Mater., 1994, 30, 1479–1483.
16.
KrautkramerJ. and KrautkramerH.: ‘Ultrasonic testing of materials’; 1983, New York, Springer-Verlag.
