The EU REACH regulation shifts the responsibility (burden of proof) for collection, evaluation and assessment of ‘chemical’ materials data from the authorities to the industry. As a result, all members of the PM supply chain must contribute to the protection of human health and the environment with regard to all substances they produce, distribute or use. The basic principle is: ‘No data, no market’. In view of this increased responsibility of individual companies, it is important for those with hazardous substances in their portfolio to consider which should be retained in the long term and which ones can be phased out. For sintered parts manufacturers, finding viable solutions to the implementation of REACH that are acceptable to the market requires effective communication with partners along the supply chain. Nickel is a substance of particular concern to PM parts manufactures and the implications of controlling dust exposure are considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Official Journal of the European Union, L396; Regulation (EC) 907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) 793/93, of Commission Regulation (EC) 1488/94, Directive 76/769/EEC and Directive 91/155/EGW, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC, Consolidated version 1 June 2012 (page numbers not available for multiple update versions; see information on relevant articles and attachments in text).
2.
Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie eV: ‘Stoffrecht: Hilfen zur Umsetzung der REACH- und CLP-Verordnung [Substances Law: Assistance for the implementation of the REACH and CLP Regulations]’, March 2012, p. 62.
3.
Official Journal of the European Union, L353; Regulation (EC) 1272/2008, of the European Parliament and of the Council, 16 December 2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures, amending and repealing Directive 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) 1907/2006, 31·12·2008, Annex I, pp. 100–116.
4.
BAuA (Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin): REACH-Info 10: ‘Die Zulassung unter REACH’ (ISBN 978-3-88261-702-3), March 2012, pp. 18–37.
5.
Official Journal of the European Union, L396: Regulation (EC) 340/2008 of 16 April 2008 on the Fees Payable to the European Chemicals Agency; Fees and Charges in Accordance with Regulation (EC 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), 17 April 2008, pp. 21–22.
6.
MerenyiS, KleihauerS, FührM, HermannA, BunkeD, ReihlenA, JensenI, HeitmannK: “Wirksame Kontrolle” von besonders besorgniserregenden Stoffen (SVHC) ohne Wirkschwelle im Rahmen der Zulassung nach REACH [‘Effective control’ of very high concern (SVHC) no effect threshold in the context of authorisation under REACH]’, commissioned by the Federal Environmental Agency of the Society for Institutional Analysis – Sofia, Darmstadt in cooperation with Ökoinstitut eV, Freiburg-Darmstadt-Berlin und Ökopol GmbH, Hamburg, Version 9.1; 28 June 2011, p. 28.
7.
EC Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry: ‘Questions and answers tailored for the implementation of Annex XVII to REACH as restrictions on the production, marketing and use of certain dangerous substances, preparations and products’, Version 5, 30 November 2011, p. 8.
8.
Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie eV: ‘Stoffrecht: Hilfen zur Umsetzung der REACH- und CLP-Verordnung [Substances Law: Assistance for the implementation of the REACH and CLP Regulations]’, March 2012, p. 63.
9.
Ausschuss für Gefahrstoffe (AGS) und Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales: ‘Bekanntmachungen zu Gefahrstoffen BekGS 409; Nutzung der REACH-Informationen für den Arbeitsschutz [Notices to hazardous substances Announcement 409, use the REACH information for health and safety]’, Gemeinsames Ministerialblatt; (GMBI), 2012, (8), 119-135; January 2012, pp. 6
10.
Länderausschuss für Arbeitsschutz und Sicherheitstechnik (LASI); ‘Handlungsanleitung für die Umsetzung der REACH-Verordnung im Arbeitsschutz [Guidance document for the implementation of the REACH Regulation in Occupational Safety]’, Publication LV51, March 2009, Chap. 1, subsection 1, ISBN 3-936415-59-5.
11.
Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie eV: ‘Stoffrecht: Hilfen zur Umsetzung der REACH- und CLP-Verordnung [Substances Law: Assistance for the implementation of the REACH and CLP Regulations]’; March 2012; p. 116, 17e
12.
Ausschuss für Gefahrstoffe (AGS) und Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales: ‘Bekanntmachungen zu Gefahrstoffen BekGS 409; Nutzung der REACH-Informationen für den Arbeitsschutz [Notices to hazardous substances Announcement 409, use the REACH information for health and safety]’, Gemeinsames Ministerialblatt (GMBI), 2012, (8), pp. 119–135; January 2012, pp. 8–9.
13.
BunkeD, GroßR, SchneiderK, OltmannsJ: ‘REACH practical guide on exposure assessment and communication in the supply chains, Part I: Introduction, chemical safety assessment, obligations of downstream users, use of existing knowledge, June 2010’, VIC und CEVIC eV, June 2012, p. 35, Fig. 5.
14.
Ref. 12, pp. 21.
15.
SECOEL: ‘Recommendation from the Scientific Committee on occupational exposure limits for nickel and nickel compounds’, SCOEL/SUM/85, May 2009, p. 1–38.
16.
OllerAR, KirkpatrickDT, RadovskyA, Bates (NiPERA)HK: ‘Inhalation carcinogenicity study with nickel metal powder in Wistar rats’, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 2008, 233, (2), 262–275.
17.
Ausschuss für Gefahrstoffe (AGS): Bearbeitungsliste des AGS – UAIII zur TRGS 900 und BekGS 910; 15 November 2011, pp. 1–7.
18.
Sánchez-JiménezA, GaleaKS, AitkenRJ: ‘Guidance for collection of relevant particle size distribution data of workplace aerosols – cascade impactor measurements’, Institute of Occupational Medicine, Report TM 09/04, May 2010, pp. 14–19.
19.
‘Socio-economic analysis of the occupational exposure limits proposed for nickel and its compounds’; Final report, Environmental Resources Management (ERM) on behalf of the Nickel Institute, March 2011, p. VII.
20.
KingE, BestD: ‘Socio-economic analysis of the occupational exposure limits proposed for nickel and its compounds’, Final report – non-confidential, Environmental Resources Management (ERM) on behalf of the Nickel Institute, March 2012, p. 79.
21.
Ref. 20, p. 72.
22.
‘REACH: Exposure’, EPMA REACH News-flash, December 2011, No. 82.
23.
Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie eV: ‘Stoffrecht: Hilfen zur Umsetzung der REACH- und CLP-Verordnung [Substances Law: Assistance for the implementation of the REACH and CLP Regulations]’, March 2012, pp. 9–10.
24.
ECHA, Forum for Exchange of Information on Enforcement: ‘Coordinated Forum: REACH enforcement project on registration, pre-registration and safety data sheets (REF-1 project)’, 21 November 2011, p. 2.
25.
Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Chemikaliensicherheit (BLAC): ‘Ergebnisse 2010/2011 über die Fortsetzung des 1. REACH-Überwachungsprojekts auf nationaler Ebene im Rahmen von Reach-en-Force 1 [Results 2010/2011 on the continuation of 1 REACH enforcement project on the national level in the context of REACH-en-Force 1’, March 2011, pp. 10–11.
26.
vom Hofe (BAuA)K: ‘Enforcement of REACH and CLP in Germany’, Proc. Conf. on REACH and CLP Enforcement, Brussels, 1 March 2012, p. 11.
27.
MakelaP, FallströmmujkicP: ‘Industry calls for uniform enforcement’, ECHA Newsletter, April 2012, (2), 16–17.
