This study investigates the paradoxical impact of AI-driven digital employees on the new product development project performance. Integrating sociotechnical systems and ambidexterity theory, we tested a moderated mediation model using three-wave, time-lagged survey data from 396 employees engaged in new product development projects. The findings reveal an inverted U-shaped relationship between digital employee adoption and perceived teamwork performance. This nonlinear effect is explained by the differential mediation of ambidextrous innovation. Digital employee adoption promotes exploitation linearly but has a curvilinear effect on exploration. Furthermore, customer participation in value cocreation strengthens the exploitation path while mitigating the potential negative effects on exploration.
AlamS. S. (2025). Impact of customer willingness to co-create and co-creation value of AI-oriented live streaming on hotel booking intention. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 130, 104246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2025.104246
2.
ArmstrongJ. S.OvertonT. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150783
3.
BachariM.SoloukiA.GhanbariH. (2025). Exploring the application of artificial intelligence in project management: A systematic literature review. Journal of Project Management, 10(3), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.jpm.2025.5.002
4.
BankinsS.OcampoA. C.MarroneM.RestubogS. L. D.WooS. E. (2024). A multilevel review of artificial intelligence in organizations: Implications for organizational behavior research and practice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 45(2), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2735
5.
BarileS.BassanoC.PiciocchiP.SavianoM.SpohrerJ. C. (2024). Empowering value co-creation in the digital age. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 39(6), 1130–1143. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-12-2019-0553
6.
BenyakhlafM.LamkademA.OkoliC. (2025). Riding the paradox: How AI consultants manage the tradeoff between explainability and performance. Information Systems Management, 42(4), 663–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2025.2506369
7.
BrowderR. E.CriderC. J.GarrettR. P. (2023). Hybrid innovation logics: Exploratory product development with users in a corporate makerspace. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 40(4), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12654
8.
CaiQ. H.WuJ. H.WuT.ChangP. C.MardaniA. (2024). The impact of digital leadership on hidden champions’ competitive advantage: A moderated mediation model of ambidextrous innovation and value co-creation. Journal of Business Research, 182, 114819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114819
9.
CastilloD.CanhotoA. I.SaidE. (2021). The dark side of AI-powered service interactions: Exploring the process of co-destruction from the customer perspective. The Service Industries Journal, 41(14), 900–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2020.1787993
10.
CenamorJ.ParidaV.WincentJ. (2019). How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity. Journal of Business Research, 100, 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.035
11.
ChanD. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234
12.
ChandraB.RahmanZ. (2024). Artificial intelligence and value co-creation: A review, conceptual framework and directions for future research. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 34(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/jstp-03-2023-0097
13.
ChenP.WuY. X. R.LiZ. S.ZhangH. B.ZhouM. X.YaoJ. Y.SunL. Y. (2025). GPSdesign: Integrating generative AI with problem-solution co-evolution network to support product conceptual design. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(19), 12130–12150. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2453003
14.
ChowdhuryS.DeyP.Joel-EdgarS.BhattacharyaS.Rodriguez-EspindolaO.AbadieA.TruongL. (2023). Unlocking the value of artificial intelligence in human resource management through AI capability framework. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100899
15.
De LoorP.Manac'hK.TisseauJ. (2009). Enaction-based artificial intelligence: Toward co-evolution with humans in the loop. Minds and Machines, 19(3), 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-009-9165-3
16.
DengZ. H.SongD.LiuS. (2025). How does AI-assisted diagnosis decision support systems influence doctors’ coping styles and work outcomes? Bright and dark sides of AI in the workplace. Decision Support Systems, 197, 114512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2025.114512
17.
DennisA. R.LakhiwalA.SachdevaA. (2023). AI agents as team members: Effects on satisfaction, conflict, trustworthiness, and willingness to work with. Journal of Management Information Systems, 40(2), 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2023.2196773
18.
DiebelC.GoutierM.AdamM.BenlianA. (2025). When AI-based agents are proactive: Implications for competence and system satisfaction in human-AI collaboration. Business & Information Systems Engineering, Early Access. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-024-00918-y
19.
DwivediY. K.HughesL.IsmagilovaE.AartsG.CoombsC.CrickT.WilliamsM. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
20.
ErikssonP. E.PatelP. C.SjödinD. R.FrishammarJ.ParidaV. (2016). Managing interorganizational innovation projects: Mitigating the negative effects of equivocality through knowledge search strategies. Long Range Planning, 49(6), 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.05.006
21.
FarzanehM.WildenR.AfshariL.MehralianG. (2022). Dynamic capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: The roles of intellectual capital and innovation orientation. Journal of Business Research, 148, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.030
22.
FügenerA.WalznerD. D.GuptaA. (2026). Roles of artificial intelligence in collaboration with humans: Automation, augmentation, and the future of work. Management Science, 72(1), 538–557. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05684
23.
GuptaA. K.SmithK. G.ShalleyC. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693–706. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083026
24.
HaansR. F. J.PietersC.HeZ. L. (2016). Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1177–1195. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2399
25.
HeP.ZhouH.ZhouQ.JiangC.AnandA. (2024). Why do employees hide knowledge after working hours? Linking non-working time ICT demands to deceptive knowledge hiding. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(7), 2062–2091. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-05-2023-0393
26.
HelkkulaA.KowalkowskiC.TronvollB. (2018). Archetypes of service innovation: Implications for value cocreation. Journal of Service Research, 21(3), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670517746776
27.
HoeglM.WeinkaufK.GemuendenH. G. (2004). Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organization Science, 15(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.0053
28.
HuZ.WuG.ZhangW. (2024). Performance improvement in megaprojects through project network characteristics and transactive memory systems. Project Management Journal, 55(3), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728231219982
29.
HughesL.MaviR. K.AghajaniM.FitzpatrickK.GunaratnegeS. M.ShekarabiS. A. H.DwivediY. K. (2025). Impact of artificial intelligence on project management (PM): Multi-expert perspectives on advancing knowledge and driving innovation toward PM2030. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(5), 100772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100772
30.
JansenJ. J. P.Van Den BoschF. A. J.VolberdaH. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
31.
JiangZ.HuX. W.WangZ. M.JiangX. (2019). Knowledge hiding as a barrier to thriving: The mediating role of psychological safety and moderating role of organizational cynicism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(7), 800–818. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2358
32.
KangH.LouC. (2022). AI agency vs. human agency: Understanding human–AI interactions on TikTok and their implications for user engagement. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 27(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac014
33.
KianiA. (2024). Artificial intelligence in entrepreneurial project management: A review, framework and research agenda. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 18(4), 708–720. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-03-2024-0068
34.
KlonekF.ParkerS. (2025). Does AI at work increase stress? Text mining social media about human–AI team processes and AI control. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.70000
KumarA.KrishnamoorthyB.BhattacharyyaS. S. (2023). Machine learning and artificial intelligence-induced technostress in organizations: A study on automation-augmentation paradox with socio-technical systems as coping mechanisms. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 32(4), 681–701. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-01-2023-3581
37.
KumarV.KumarS.ChatterjeeS.MarianiM. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities and the R&D performance of organizations: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 11522–11532. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2024.3423669
38.
KumarV.KumarS.ChaudhuriR.ChatterjeeS.VrontisD.VessalS. R. (2025). Innovation capability and R&D performance of organizations: Moderating role of industry-academic knowledge transfer. Journal of Knowledge Management, 29(3), 891–914. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-02-2024-0175
39.
LeK.SajtosL.KunzW.FernandezK. (2024). The future of work: Understanding the effectiveness of collaboration between human and digital employees in service. Journal of Service Research, 28(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705241229419
40.
LinR. H.LiY. L.LiW. C.JiZ.LiB. T. (2025). AI-enabled individual learning strategies and scientific innovation: A case from the field of computer science. Scientometrics, 130(7), 3651–3677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-025-05345-8
41.
LindJ. T.MehlumH. (2010). With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2009.00569.x
42.
LiuX.HuangP.LiZ.ZhaoD.WuY. (2025). The effects of leader–follower relational schema congruence on employees’ knowledge hiding. Journal of Knowledge Management, 29(11), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-07-2024-0758
43.
LugerJ.RaischS.SchimmerM. (2018). Dynamic balancing of exploration and exploitation: The contingent benefits of ambidexterity. Organization Science, 29(3), 449–470. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1189
44.
MahrD.LievensA.BlazevicV. (2014). The value of customer cocreated knowledge during the innovation process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12116
45.
MakariusE. E.MukherjeeD.FoxJ. D.FoxA. K. (2020). Rising with the machines: A sociotechnical framework for bringing artificial intelligence into the organization. Journal of Business Research, 120, 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.045
46.
MarchJ. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
47.
MarionT.YuanC.MoghaddamM. (2025). Integrating AI into the front end of new product development. Research-Technology Management, 68(2), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2024.2444142
48.
MarziG.BalzanoM. (2025). Artificial intelligence and the reconfiguration of NPD teams: Adaptability and skill differentiation in sustainable product innovation. Technovation, 145, 103254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103254
49.
MayerA. S.BaygiR. M.BuwaldaR. (2025). Generation AI: Job crafting by entry-level professionals in the age of generative AI. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 67(5), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-025-00959-x
50.
MikalefP.GuptaM. (2021). Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance. Information & Management, 58(3), 103434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103434
51.
MithasS.RamasubbuN.SambamurthyV. (2011). How information management capability influences firm performance. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043496
52.
NenniM. E.De FeliceF.De LucaC.ForcinaA. (2025). How artificial intelligence will transform project management in the age of digitization: A systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 75(2), 1669–1716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00418-z
53.
PachidiS.BerendsH.FarajS.HuysmanM. (2021). Make way for the algorithms: Symbolic actions and change in a regime of knowing. Organization Science, 32(1), 18–41. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1377
RaischS.FominaK. (2025). Combining human and artificial intelligence: Hybrid problem-solving in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 50(2), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2021.0421
56.
RaischS.KrakowskiS. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072
57.
RosingK.ZacherH. (2017). Individual ambidexterity: The duality of exploration and exploitation and its relationship with innovative performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(5), 694–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1238358
58.
SeoR.ParkJ. H. (2022). When is interorganizational learning beneficial for inbound open innovation of ventures?A contingent role of entrepreneurial orientation. Technovation, 116, 102514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102514
59.
SiemonD.ElshanE.de VreedeT.EbelP.de VreedeG.-J. (2025). Beyond anthropomorphism: Social presence in human–AI collaboration processes. Journal of Management Studies, 63(2), 515–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.70000
60.
SinghK.ChatterjeeS.MarianiM. (2024). Applications of generative AI and future organizational performance: The mediating role of explorative and exploitative innovation and the moderating role of ethical dilemmas and environmental dynamism. Technovation, 133(1), 103021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103021
61.
SlizP.SicinskiJ.JackowskaB. (2024). The impact of ambidexterity on robotic process automation implementation strategy in service enterprises. Future Business Journal, 10(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00296-z
62.
SongY. W.YanT. T.JiaF.ChenL. J.LiH. (2025). Developing generative AI for value co-creation: An intervention-based randomized field experiment in a healthcare context. Journal of Operations Management, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.70012
63.
StylosN.OkumusF.OnderI. (2025). Beauty or the borg: Agentic artificial intelligence organizational socialization in synergistic hybrid transformative dynamic flows. Tourism Management, 111, 105205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2025.105205
64.
SunY.XuX. B.YuH. Q.WangH. C. (2022). Impact of value co-creation in the artificial intelligence innovation ecosystem on competitive advantage and innovation intelligibility. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 39(3), 474–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2860
65.
SunY.TellF. (2025). Tensions in digital transformation: How prototype work links the temporary and the permanent. Project Management Journal, 56(3), 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728241278661
66.
TangM. P.KoopmanJ.McCleanS. T.ZhangJ. H.LiC. H.De CremerD.NgC. T. S. (2022). When conscientious employees meet intelligent machines: An integrative approach inspired by complementarity theory and role theory. Academy of Management Journal, 65(3), 1019–1054. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2020.1516
67.
TaoX. M.WangC. L.RobsonP. J. A. (2023). Regulatory focus, ambidextrous learning, and opportunity recognition in new product development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 4365–4376. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2023.3240029
68.
TongS.JiaN.LuoX.FangZ. (2021). The Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance. Strategic Management Journal, 42(9), 1600–1631. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3322
69.
TurnerN.MaylorH.SwartJ. (2015). Ambidexterity in projects: An intellectual capital perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.05.002
70.
UmK.-H.KimS.-M. (2018). Collaboration and opportunism as mediators of the relationship between NPD project uncertainty and NPD project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 36(4), 659–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.01.006
71.
VialG.CameronA.-F.GianneliaT.JiangJ. (2023). Managing artificial intelligence projects: Key insights from an AI consulting firm. Information Systems Journal, 33(3), 669–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12420
72.
WallT. D.MichieJ.PattersonM.WoodS. J.SheehanM.CleggC. W.WestM. A. (2004). On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02485.x
73.
WangS.EsperançaJ. P. (2023). Can digital transformation improve market and ESG performance? Evidence from Chinese SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 419, 137980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137980
74.
WangW. T.HackettR. D.ArcherN.XuZ. C.YuanY. F. (2025). Will AI-enabled conversational agents acting as digital employees enhance employee job identity?Information & Management, 62(2), 104099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2025.104099
75.
WuY.ChenJ.-C. (2021). Stimulating innovation with an innovative curriculum: A curriculum design for a course on new product development. International Journal of Management Education, 19(3), 100561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100561
76.
YangS.CuiG.LuS. (2020). Ambidextrous learning of engineering project team: Relying on control or BIM AI VR AR MR?International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979020948749
77.
YeH. J.ChuaC. E. H. (2025). Effect of ambidexterity on contestants’ creative performance in open innovation contests. Production and Operations Management, 34(7), 1901–1920. https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478241305874
78.
YenC. H. (2023). Customer value cocreation behaviors in hospitality: Antecedents and mediators. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 110, 103456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103456
79.
YuX. Y.XuS.AshtonM. (2023). Antecedents and outcomes of artificial intelligence adoption and application in the workplace: The socio-technical system theory perspective. Information Technology & People, 36(1), 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-04-2021-0254
80.
ZercherD.JussupowE.BenkeI.HeinzlA. (2025). How can teams benefit from AI team members? Exploring the effect of generative AI on decision-making processes and decision quality in team–AI collaboration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Early Access. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2898
81.
ZhengJ.ZhuoR.XieH.WuG.ZhaoX. (2025). How empowerment congruence impacts performance in cross-functional project teams: A polynomial regression analysis. Project Management Journal, 56(4), 501–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728241286040
82.
ZhuY.-Q.KanjanamekanantK. (2023). Human-bot co-working: Job outcomes and employee responses. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(2), 515–533. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-02-2022-0114
