In a volatile environment, identifying effective collaboration elements is crucial for innovation. This article focuses on agile team characteristics that influence innovative work behavior by introducing the concept “agile working,” which encompasses autonomy, equality, and iterative delivery (
Koch & Schermuly, 2021a). By applying work design and media richness theories, a moderated mediation process is tested, revealing an indirect effect of agile working on innovative work behavior via psychological empowerment. The findings on media richness suggest a complex interaction between communication media and agile working, indicating that agile teams do not always benefit from rich communication media such as in-person interactions.
AlEssaH. S.DurugboC. M. (2022). Systematic review of innovative work behavior concepts and contributions. Management Review Quarterly, 72(4), 1171–1208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00224-x
2.
AugnerT.SchermulyC. C. (2023). Agile project management and emotional exhaustion: A moderated mediation process. Project Management Journal, 54(5), 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728231151930
3.
BagheriA.AkbariM.ArtangA. (2022). How does entrepreneurial leadership affect innovation work behavior? The mediating role of individual and team creativity self-efficacy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2020-0281
4.
BarbosaA. P. F. P. L.SalernoM. S.de Souza NascimentoP. T.AlbalaA.MaranzatoF. P.TamoschusD. (2021). Configurations of project management practices to enhance the performance of open innovation R&D projects. International Journal of Project Management, 39(2), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.06.005
5.
BerberoğlugilB. M. (2020). Virtual teams: Team empowerment, process improvement, team member satisfaction and customer satisfaction. IUP Journal of Management Research, 19(3), 23–61.
6.
BianchiM.MarziG.GueriniM. (2020). Agile, stage-gate and their combination: Exploring how they relate to performance in software development. Journal of Business Research, 110, 538–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.003
7.
BiemannT.ColeM. S.VoelpelS. (2012). Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of rWG and rWG (J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.006
8.
BogilovićS.BortoluzziG.ČerneM.GhasemzadehK.ŽnidaršičJ. (2021). Diversity, climate and innovative work behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(5), 1502–1524. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-03-2020-0100
9.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
10.
Bos-NehlesA.RenkemaM.JanssenM. (2017). HRM and innovative work behaviour: A systematic literature review. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1228–1253. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2016-0257
BunyakiatiP.SurachaikulwattanaP. (2016). Fit between agile practices and organizational cultures. 2016 13th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE) (pp. 1–6).
13.
CaplanR. D. (1987). Person-environment fit theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31(3), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(87)90042-X
14.
CavanaughK. J.LeeH. Y.DaumD.ChangS.IzzoJ. G.KowalskiA.HolladayC. L. (2020). An examination of burnout predictors: Understanding the influence of job attitudes and environment. Healthcare, 8(4), 502. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040502
15.
ChangH.VarvelloM.HaoF.MukherjeeS. (2021). Can you see me now? A measurement study of Zoom,Webex, and Meet. Proceedings of the 21st ACM Internet Measurement Conference (pp. 216–228). https://doi.org/10.1145/3487552.3487847
16.
ĆirićD.GračaninD. (2017). Agile project management beyond software industry. In Proceedings of the XV International Scientific Conference on Industrial Systems (pp. 332–337). https://iim.ftn.uns.ac.rs/is17/papers/60.pdf
Copola AzenhaF.Aparecida ReisD.Leme FleuryA. (2021). The role and characteristics of hybrid approaches to project management in the development of technology-based products and services. Project Management Journal, 52(1), 90–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820956884
20.
DaftR. L.LengelR. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
21.
DeanD. L.HenderJ. M.RodgersT. L.SantanenE. (2006). Identifying quality, novel, and creative ideas: Constructs and scales for idea evaluation. Journal of Association for Information Systems, 7(10), 646–699.
DeRosaD. M.SmithC. L.HantulaD. A. (2007). The medium matters: Mining the long-promised merit of group interaction in creative idea generation tasks in a meta-analysis of the electronic group brainstorming literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1549–1581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.07.003
24.
DongH.DacreN.BaxterD.CeylanS. (2024). What is agile project management?Developing a new definition following a systematic literature review. Project Management Journal, 55(6), 668–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728241254095
25.
DybåT.DingsøyrT.MoeN. B. (2014). Agile project management. In RuheG.WohlinC. (Eds.), Software project management in a changing world. 277–300Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55035-5
26.
EchebiriC.AmundsenS.EngenM. (2020). Linking structural empowerment to employee-driven innovation: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Administrative Sciences, 10(3), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030042
27.
EcksteinD.GoellnerM.BlomeC.HenkeM. (2015). The performance impact of supply chain agility and supply chain adaptability: The moderating effect of product complexity. International Journal of Production Research, 53(10), 3028–3046. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.970707
FernandezD. J.FernandezJ. D. (2008). Agile project management—Agilism versus traditional approaches. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(2), 10–17.
30.
FowlerM.HighsmithJ. (2001). The agile manifesto. Software Development, 9(8), 28–35.
31.
FullertonR. R.KennedyF. A.WidenerS. K. (2014). Lean manufacturing and firm performance: The incremental contribution of lean management accounting practices. Journal of Operations Management, 32(7–8), 414–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.09.002
32.
GeminoA.Horner ReichB.SerradorP. M. (2021). Agile, traditional, and hybrid approaches to project success: Is hybrid a poor second choice?Project Management Journal, 52(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820973082
33.
GhoshV.BharadwajaM.YadavS.KabraG. (2019). Team-member exchange and innovative work behaviour: The role of psychological empowerment and creative self-efficacy. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(3), 344–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-12-2018-0132
34.
GrözingerN.IrlenbuschB.LaskeK.SchröderM. (2020). Innovation and communication media in virtual teams—An experimental study. Virtual Teams, 27, 201–218.
35.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
HolmanD.TotterdellP.AxtellC.StrideC.PortR.SvenssonR.ZibarrasL. (2012). Job design and the employee innovation process: The mediating role of learning strategies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(2), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9242-5
38.
HülshegerU. R.AndersonN.SalgadoJ. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128–1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015978
39.
HusseinB.AssiA.RaadM.DimachkM.ZayyatR.HusseinM. (2023). From co-location to remote work: Remedies for agile project management during COVID-19 pandemic. In the 2023 Fifth International Conference on Advances in Computational Tools for Engineering Applications (ACTEA) (pp. 205–210). IEEE.
40.
IshiiK.LyonsM. M.CarrS. A. (2019). Revisiting media richness theory for today and future. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.138
41.
JamesL. R.DemareeR. G.WolfG. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
42.
JanssenO. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302.
43.
JunkerT. L.BakkerA. B.DerksD.MolenaarD. (2023). Agile work practices: Measurement and mechanisms. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 32(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2022.2096439
44.
JunkerT. L.BakkerA. B.GorgievskiM. J.DerksD. (2022). Agile work practices and employee proactivity: A multilevel study. Human Relations, 75(12), 2189–2217. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211030101
45.
KamaruddinN. K.ArshadN. H.MohamedA. (2012). Chaos issues on communication in agile global software development. The 2012 IEEE Business, Engineering & Industrial Applications Colloquium (BEIAC) (pp. 394–398).https://doi.org/10.1109/BEIAC.2012.6226091
46.
KhanaghaS.VolberdaH. W.AlexiouA.AnnosiM. C. (2022). Mitigating the dark side of agile teams: Peer pressure, leaders’ control, and the innovative output of agile teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(3), 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12589
47.
KirkmanB. L.RosenB. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/256874
48.
KochJ.DrazicI.SchermulyC. C. (2023). The affective, behavioural and cognitive outcomes of agile project management: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 96(3), 678–706. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12429
49.
KochJ.SchermulyC. C. (2021a). Managing the crisis: How COVID-19 demands interact with agile project management in predicting employee exhaustion. British Journal of Management, 32(4), 1265–1283. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12536
50.
KochJ.SchermulyC. C. (2021b). Who is attracted and why?How agile project management influences employee’s attraction and commitment. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(3), 699–720. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-02-2020-0063
51.
KooT. K.LiM. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
52.
LeeA.LegoodA.HughesD.TianA. W.NewmanA.KnightC. (2020). Leadership, creativity and innovation: A meta-analytic review. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1661837
53.
LichtenthalerU. (2020). A conceptual framework for combining agile and structured innovation processes. Research-Technology Management, 63(5), 42–48.
54.
Llorente-AlonsoM.García-AelC.TopaG. (2024). A meta-analysis of psychological empowerment: Antecedents, organizational outcomes, and moderating variables. Current Psychology, 43(2), 1759–1784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04369-8
55.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Prentice-Hall.
56.
MalikM.SarwarS.OrrS. (2021). Agile practices and performance: Examining the role of psychological empowerment. International Journal of Project Management, 39(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.09.002
57.
MoeN. B.FaegriT. E.CruzesD. S.FaugstadJ. E. (2016). Enabling knowledge sharing in agile virtual teams. The 2016 IEEE 11th International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE) (pp. 29–33).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGSE.2016.30
58.
MunkesJ.DiehlM. (2003). Matching or competition? Performance comparison processes in an idea generation task. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302030063006
59.
Najafi-TavaniS.Najafi-TavaniZ.NaudéP.OghaziP.ZeynalooE. (2018). How collaborative innovation networks affect new product performance: Product innovation capability, process innovation capability, and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 73, 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.009
QiY.MaoZ.ZhangM.GuoH. (2020). Manufacturing practices and servitization: The role of mass customization and product innovation capabilities. International Journal of Production Economics, 228, 107747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107747
62.
R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Projects.
63.
RigbyD. K.SutherlandJ.NobleA. (2018). Agile at scale. Harvard Business Review, 96(3), 88–96.
64.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
65.
SantosP. D. O.De CarvalhoM. M. (2022). Exploring the challenges and benefits for scaling agile project management to large projects: A review. Requirements Engineering, 27(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-021-00363-3
66.
SariD. K.YudiarsoA.SinambelaF. C. (2021). Work engagement and innovative work behavior: Meta-analysis study.The International Conference on Psychological Studies (ICPSYCHE2020), Semarang, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210423.053
67.
Schermelleh-EngelK.MoosbruggerH.MüllerH. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
68.
SchermulyC. C.MeifertC. (2023). Kein Erfolg ohne Empowerment. Personalmagazin, 09/23, 24–29.
69.
SchippersM. C.WestM. A.DawsonJ. F. (2015). Team reflexivity and innovation: The moderating role of team context. Journal of Management, 41(3), 769–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312441210
70.
SchwaberK.SutherlandJ. (2011). The scrum guide. Scrum Alliance, 21(1), 1–38.
71.
SeibertS. E.WangG.CourtrightS. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 981–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022676
72.
SerradorP.PintoJ. K. (2015). Does agile work? A quantitative analysis of agile project success. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1040–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006
73.
SetorT. K.JosephD. (2022). When agile means staying: A moderated mediated model. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 62(1), 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2020.1759160
74.
SimM.KimS.-Y.SuhY. (2022). Sample size requirements for simple and complex mediation models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 82(1), 76–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644211003261
75.
SpreitzerG. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865
76.
SpreitzerG. M. (2008). Taking stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work. In BarlingJ.CooperC. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 64–72). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200448.n4
77.
ŠpundakM. (2014). Mixed agile/traditional project management methodology—Reality or illusion?Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 939–948.
78.
SrivastavaP.JainS. (2017). A leadership framework for distributed self-organized scrum teams. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 23(5/6), 293–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-06-2016-0033
SteigerJ. H. (2004). Beyond the F test: Effect size confidence intervals and tests of close fit in the analysis of variance and contrast analysis. Psychological Methods, 9(2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.9.2.164
81.
TaştanS. B. (2013). The influences of participative organizational climate and self-leadership on innovative behavior and the roles of job involvement and proactive personality: A survey in the context of SMES in Izmir. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, 407–419.
82.
TuomivaaraS.LindholmH.KänsäläM. (2017). Short-term physiological strain and recovery among employees working with agile and lean methods in software and embedded ICT systems. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 33(11), 857–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1294336
83.
UraonR. S.BharatiR.SahuK.ChauhanA. (2023). Agile work practices and team creativity: The mediating role of team efficacy. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 11(2), 500–521. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-04-2023-0115
84.
UraonR. S.ChauhanA.BharatiR.SahuK. (2024). Do agile work practices impact team performance through project commitment?Evidence from the information technology industry. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(4), 1212–1234. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2023-0114
85.
VenkateshV.ThongJ. Y. L.ChanF. K. Y.HoehleH.SpohrerK. (2020). How agile software development methods reduce work exhaustion: Insights on role perceptions and organizational skills. Information Systems Journal, 30(4), 733–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12282
86.
WagnerJ. I. J.CummingsG.SmithD. L.OlsonJ.AndersonL.WarrenS. (2010). The relationship between structural empowerment and psychological empowerment for nurses: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Management, 18(4), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01088.x
87.
WangY.GraziotinD.KrisoS.WagnerS. (2019). Communication channels in safety analysis: An industrial exploratory case study. Journal of Systems and Software, 153, 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.004
88.
WestM. A.FarrJ. L. (1989). Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives. Social Behaviour, 4(1), 15–30.
89.
WoehrD. J.LoignonA. C.SchmidtP. B.LoughryM. L.OhlandM. W. (2015). Justifying aggregation with consensus-based constructs: A review and examination of cutoff values for common aggregation indices. Organizational Research Methods, 18(4), 704–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115582090
90.
ZiembaP.PiwowarskiM.NermendK. (2023). Remote work in post-pandemic reality—Multi-criteria evaluation of teleconferencing software. Sustainability, 15(13), 9919. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139919
