This study proposes program orientation as an organizational culture that motivates organizations to manage interrelated projects like a program without a formal structure or program team. We hold that collaboration, with cooperation and coordination as its main elements, plays a critical role in aligning interrelated projects dynamically. The empirical results support our hypotheses that program orientation indirectly affects information systems alignment with interproject cooperation, coordination, and adaptability mediating its effects. This study thus confirms the benefit of treating interrelated projects as a program, even when they are not governed by a formal program structure.
ArttoK.MartinsuoM.GemündenH. G.MurtoaroJ. (2009). Foundations of program management: A bibliometric view. International Journal of Project Management, 27(1), 1–18. DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.10.007
2.
BharadwajA.El SawyO. A.PavlouP.VenkatramanN. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3
3.
BoltonR.LoganC.GittellJ. H. (2021). Revisiting relational coordination: A systematic review. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 57(3), 290–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886321991597
4.
ChanY. E. (2002). Why haven’t we mastered alignment? The importance of the informal organization structure. MIS Quarterly Executive, 1(2), 95–110.
5.
ChanY. E.HuffS. L.BarclayD. W.CopelandD. G. (1997). Business strategic orientation, information systems strategic orientation, and strategic alignment. Information Systems Research, 8(2), 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.2.125
6.
ChangJ. Y. T.JiangJ. J.KleinG.WangE. T. G. (2014). Do too many goals impede a program?A case study of enterprise system implementation with multiple interdependent projects. Information & Management, 51(4), 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.03.004
7.
ChangJ. Y. T.JiangJ. J.KleinG.WangE. T. G. (2019). Enterprise system programs: Goal setting and cooperation in the integration team. Information & Management, 56(6), 103137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.12.005
8.
ChatmanJ. A.CaldwellD. F.O'ReillyC. A.DoerrB. (2014). Parsing organizational culture: How the norm for adaptability influences the relationship between culture consensus and financial performance in high-technology firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(6), 785–808. doi: 10.1002/job.1928
9.
ChatmanJ. A.O’ReillyC. A. (2016). Paradigm lost: Reinvigorating the study of organizational culture. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.11.004
10.
ChenD. Q.MockerM.PrestonD. S.TeubnerA. (2010). Information systems strategy: Reconceptualization, measurement, and implications. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 233–259. DOI:10.2307/20721426
11.
ChenX.-P.LamS. S. K.NaumannS. E.SchaubroeckJ. (2005). Group citizenship behaviour: Conceptualization and preliminary test of its antecedents and consequences. Management and Organization Review, 1(2), 273–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2005.00012.x
12.
DetzenN.VerbeetenF. H. M.GammN.MöllerK. (2018). Formal controls and team adaptability in new product development projects. Management Decision, 56(7), 1541–1558. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2017-0692
13.
DibbleR.GibsonC. (2013). Collaboration for the common good: An examination of challenges and adjustment processes in multicultural collaborations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(6), 764–790. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1872
14.
DietrichP. (2006). Mechanisms for inter-project integration—Empirical analysis in program context. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280603700306
15.
DownesP. E.Gonzalez-MuléE.SeongJ. Y.ParkW. W. (2021). To collaborate or not? The moderating effects of team conflict on performance-prove goal orientation, collaboration, and team performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(3), 568–590. doi:10.1111/joop.12360
ErnstH.HoyerW. D.RübsaamenC. (2010). Sales, marketing, and research-and-development cooperation across new product development stages: Implications for success. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.5.080
18.
EuwemaM. C.WendtH.van EmmerikH. (2007). Leadership styles and group organizational citizenship behavior across cultures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(8), 1035–1057. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.496
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
21.
GerowJ. E.GroverV.ThatcherJ.RothP. L. (2014). Looking toward the future of IT-business strategic alignment through the past: A meta-analysis. MIS Quarterly, 38(4), 1159–1186. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.4.10
GulatiR.WohlgezogenF.ZhelyazkovP. (2012). The two facets of collaboration: Cooperation and coordination in strategic alliances. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 531–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2012.691646
24.
HaffkeI.KalgovasB. J.BenlianA. (2017). Options for transforming the IT function using bimodal IT. MIS Quarterly Executive, 16(2), 101–120.
25.
Hair Jr.J. FHultG. T. M.RingleC. M.SarstedtM. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
26.
HenselerJ.RingleC. M.SarstedtM. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
27.
HoeglM.WeinkaufK.GemuendenH. G. (2004). Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organization Science, 15(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.0053
28.
JiangJ. J.KleinG.FernandezW. D. (2018). From project management to program management: An invitation to investigate program where IT plays a significant role. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(1), 40–57. DOI:10.17705/1jais.00480
29.
JiangJ. J.KleinG.HuangW. (2020). Projects, programs, and portfolios in strategic organizational transformation. Business Expert Press.
30.
KearnsG. S.LedererA. L. (2000). The effect of strategic alignment on the use of IS-based resources for competitive advantage. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(4), 265–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00049-4
31.
KistruckG. M.LountR. B.Jr.SmithB. R.BergmanB. J.Jr.MossT. W. (2016). Cooperation vs. competition: Alternative goal structures for motivating groups in a resource scarce environment. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1174–1198. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0201
32.
LarsonJ. R.SchaumannL. J. (1993). Group goals, group coordination, and group member motivation. Human Performance, 6(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup0601_3
33.
LeidnerD. E.KayworthT. R. (2006). A review of culture in information systems research: Toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 357–399. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148735
34.
LuftmanJ.LyytinenK.ZviT. b. (2017). Enhancing the measurement of information technology (IT) business alignment and its influence on company performance. Journal of Information Technology, 32(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.23
35.
LuoY. (2002). Contract, cooperation, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 23(10), 903–919. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.261
MartinsuoM.KantolahtiT. (2009). Knowledge integration between the change program and the parent organisation. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 3(3–4), 241–258. doi: 10.1504/IJKMS.2009.028839
38.
MidlerC.ManiakR.de CampigneullesT. (2019). Ambidextrous program management: The case of autonomous mobility. Project Management Journal, 50(5), 571–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819869091
39.
NarverJ. C.SlaterS. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400403
40.
NarverJ. C.SlaterS. F. (1998). Additional thoughts on the measurement of market orientation: A comment of Deshpande and Farley. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 2, 233–236. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009747516235
41.
NieminenA.LehtonenM. (2008). Organisational control in programme teams: An empirical study in change programme context. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.001
42.
O’ConnellD.HickersonK.PillutlaA. (2011). Organizational visioning: An integrative review. Group & Organization Management, 36(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601110390999
43.
O’ReillyC. A.CaldwellD. F.ChatmanJ. A.DoerrB. (2014). The promise and problems of organizational culture: CEO personality, culture, and firm performance. Group & Organization Management, 39(6), 595–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114550713
44.
O’ReillyC. A.ChatmanJ. A. (1996). Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. In StawB. M.CummingsL. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (Vol. 18, pp. 157–200). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
45.
OkhuysenG. A.BechkyB. A. (2009). Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 463–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520903047533
ParoliaN.GoodmanS.LiY.JiangJ. J. (2007). Mediators between coordination and IS project performance. Information & Management, 44(7), 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.06.003
48.
ParoliaN.JiangJ. J.KleinG.SheuT. S. (2011). The contribution of resource interdependence to IT program performance: A social interdependence perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 29(3), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.03.004
49.
PavlouP. A.LiangH.XueY. (2007). Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 105–136.
50.
PellegrinelliS. (1997). Programme management: Organising project-based change. International Journal of Project Management, 15(3), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00063-4
PellegrinelliS.Murray-WebsterR.TurnerN. (2015). Facilitating organizational ambidexterity through the complementary use of projects and programs. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.04.008
54.
PellegrinelliS.PartingtonD.HemingwayC.MohdzainZ.ShahM. (2007). The importance of context in programme management: An empirical review of programme practices. International Journal of Project Management, 25(1), 41–55.
55.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
56.
PrestonD. S.KarahannaE. (2009). Antecedents of IS strategic alignment: A nomological network. Information Systems Research, 20(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0159
57.
RaverJ. L.EhrhartM. G.ChadwickI. C. (2012). The emergence of team helping norms: Foundations within members’ attributes and behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(5), 616–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.772
58.
ReichB. H.BenbasatI. (1996). Measuring the linkage between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quarterly, 20(1), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.2307/249542
59.
ReichB. H.BenbasatI. (2000). Factors that influence the social dimension of alignment between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 81–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250980
60.
RitsonG.JohansenE.OsborneA. (2012). Successful programs wanted: Exploring the impact of alignment. Project Management Journal, 43(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20273
61.
SalvatoC.ReuerJ. J.BattigalliP. (2017). Cooperation across disciplines: A multilevel perspective on cooperative behavior in governing interfirm relations. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 960–1004. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0001
62.
ShaoJ.MüllerR.TurnerJ. R. (2012). Measuring program success. Project Management Journal, 43(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20286
63.
TemelS.MentionA.-L.YurtsevenA. E. (2023). Cooperation for innovation: More is not necessarily merrier. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(2), 446–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2020-0392
64.
ThiryM. (2002). Combining value and project management into an effective programme management model. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00072-2
65.
TiwanaA. (2010). Systems development ambidexterity: Explaining the complementary and substitutive roles of formal and informal controls. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(2), 87–126. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270203
VereeckeA.PandelaereE.DeschoolmeesterD.StevensM. (2003). A classification of development programmes and its consequences for programme management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(10), 1279–1290. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570310496670
68.
VialG. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
69.
WangY.LiuY.CanelC. (2018). Process coordination, project attributes and project performance in offshore-outsourced service projects. International Journal of Project Management, 36(7), 980–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.02.005
70.
WolfT.JahnS.HammerschmidtM.WeigerW. H. (2021). Competition versus cooperation: How technology-facilitated social interdependence initiates the self-improvement chain. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 38(2), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.06.001
71.
WongA.TjosvoldD.LiuC. (2009). Innovation by teams in Shanghai, China: Cooperative goals for group confidence and persistence. British Journal of Management, 20(2), 238–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00563.x
72.
WuS. P.-J.StraubD. W.LiangT.-P. (2015). How information technology governance mechanisms and strategic alignment influence organizational performance: Insights from a matched survey of business and IT managers. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 497–518. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.10
