Timing, that is selecting the right time or speed, is critical in urgent projects, yet there are few studies addressing timing in project management. This article emphasizes event time to better understand that timing is not simply a given externality and points to the importance of enacting events and urgency. Furthermore, the article distinguishes between synchronic and diachronic time perspectives. By transferring insights from disaster management and fast-response organizations, the article shows that (synchronous) coordination is best done by organizational improvisation and fragmentation, whereas (diachronic) pace and rhythm are marked by seizing opportunities, deliberately induced interruptions, and periods of patience.
AkkermansH.van OorschotK. E. (2016). Pilot error? Managerial decision biases as explanation for disruptions in aircraft development. Project Management Journal, 47(2), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21585
2.
AnconaD. G.GoodmanP. S.LawrenceB. S.TushmanM. L. (2001). Time: A new research lens. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 645–663. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.5393903
3.
BakkerR. M.Janowicz-PanjaitanM. (2009). Time matters: The impact of “temporariness” on the functioning and performance of organizations. In KenisP.Janowicz-PanjaitanM.CambéB. (Eds.), Temporary organizations: Prevalence, logic and effectiveness (pp. 121–141). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849802154.00013
4.
BarrettF. J. (1998). Coda—Creativity and improvisation in jazz and organizations: Implications for organizational learning. Organization Science, 9(5), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.5.605
5.
BartonM. A.KahnW. A. (2019). Group resilience: The place and meaning of relational pauses. Organization Studies, 40(9), 1409–1429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618782294
6.
BartonM. A.SutcliffeK. M. (2009). Overcoming dysfunctional momentum: Organizational safety as a social achievement. Human Relations, 62(9), 1327–1356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709334491
7.
BartonM. A.SutcliffeK. M. (2010). Learning when to stop momentum. MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(3), 69–76.
8.
BartonM. A.SutcliffeK. M.VogusT. J.DewittT. (2015). Performing under uncertainty: Contextualized engagement in wildland firefighting. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 23(2), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12076
9.
BechkyB. A.OkhuysenG. A. (2011). Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handle surprises. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263060
10.
BiesenthalC.SankaranS.PitsisT. S.CleggS. R. (2015). Temporality in organization studies: Implications for strategic project management. Open Economics and Management Journal, 2(Suppl 1: M7), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.2174/2352630001502010045
11.
BlountS.JanicikG. A. (2001). When plans change: Examining how people evaluate timing changes in work organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 566–585. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.5393892
BöhleF. (2017). Improvisation durch objektivierendes und subjektivierendes Handeln (Improvisation through objectifying and subjectifying action). In StarkW.VossebrecherD.DellC.SchmidhuberH. (Eds.), Improvisation und Organisation (Improvisation and organization) (pp. 73–92). Bielefeld: transcript. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839426111-004
14.
BoinA.BrownC.RichardsonJ. A. (2019). Managing Hurricane Katrina: Lessons from a megacrisis. Louisiana State University Press.
15.
BrookesN.SageD.DaintyA.LocatelliG.WhyteJ. (2017). An island of constancy in a sea of change: Rethinking project temporalities with long-term megaprojects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(7), 1213–1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.05.007
16.
BrownA. D.ColvilleI.PyeA. (2015). Making sense of sensemaking in organization studies. Organization Studies, 36(2), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614559259
17.
BrunelleP. J. L. (2017). Time in organization studies: An overview of the literature on the state of theory, research and practice. Working paper. (HAL No. hal-01567237). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01567237
ConfortoE. C.SalumF.AmaralD. C.Da SilvaS. L.AlmeidaL. F. M. de (2014). Can agile project management be adopted by industries other than software development?Project Management Journal, 45(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21410
20.
CrossanM.CunhaM. P. E.VeraD.CunhaJ. V. d. (2005). Time and organizational improvisation. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.15281441
21.
CuganesanS. (2021). Investigating how the clock–event time dialectic shapes the doing of time in organizational change. Organization Studies, online first, 017084062110062. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406211006252
DahlbergR.RubinO.VendeløM. T. (Eds.) (2017). Disaster research: Multidisciplinary and international perspectives. Routledge.
26.
Danner-SchröderA.GeigerD. (2016). Unravelling the motor of patterning work: Toward an understanding of the microlevel dynamics of standardization and flexibility. Organization Science, 27(3), 633–658. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1055
DennehyD.ConboyK. (2018). Identifying challenges and a research agenda for flow in software project management. Project Management Journal, 49(6), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972818800559
31.
DilleT.SöderlundJ. (2011). Managing inter-institutional projects: The significance of isochronism, timing norms and temporal misfits. International Journal of Project Management, 29(4), 480–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.02.007
32.
DilleT.SöderlundJ. (2013). Managing temporal misfits in institutional environments. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6(3), 552–575. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-03-2012-0006
33.
DilleT.SöderlundJ.CleggS. R. (2018). Temporal conditioning and the dynamics of inter-institutional projects. International Journal of Project Management, 36(5), 673–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.03.007
34.
Du GayP. (2017). “A pause in the impatience of things”: Notes on formal organization, the bureaucratic ethos, and speed. In WajcmanJ.DoddN. (Eds.), The sociology of speed: Digital, organizational, and social temporalities (pp. 86–101). Oxford University Press.
FernandezD. J.FernandezJ. D. (2008). Agile project management—Agilism versus traditional approaches. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(2), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2009.11646044
GeigerD.Danner-SchröderA.KremserW. (2020). Getting ahead of time—Performing temporal boundaries to coordinate routines under temporal uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly66(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839220941010
39.
GeraldiJ. G.StjerneI. S.OehmenJ. (2020). Acting in time: Temporal work enacting tensions at the interface between temporary and permanent organizations. In BraunT.LampelJ. (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations: volume 67. Tensions and paradoxes in temporary organizing (pp. 81–103). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20200000067010
40.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press.
41.
GoldrattE. M. (1990). What is this thing called theory of constraints and how should it be implemented?North River Press.
HassardJ. (1989). Time and industrial society. In BlytonP.HassardJ.HillS.StarkeyK. (Eds.), Time, work and organization (pp. 13–34). Routledge.
45.
HuyQ. N. (2001). Time, temporal capability, and planned change. The Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 601–623. https://doi.org/10.2307/3560244
46.
JanssenM.LeeJ.BharosaN.CresswellA. (2010). Advances in multi-agency disaster management: Key elements in disaster research. Information Systems Frontiers, 12(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9176-x
47.
JaquesE. (1982). The form of time. Crane Russak.
48.
JenningsJ.HaughtonL. (2002). It's not the big that eat the small… it's the fast that eat the slow: How to use speed as a competitive tool in business. HarperBusiness.
49.
JettQ. R.GeorgeJ. M. (2003). Work interrupted: A closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 494–507. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040736
50.
JoergesB. (2003). Reflections on the millennium, calendars, and the Gregorian Hegemony. In JoergesB.NowotnyH. (Eds.), Social studies of science and technology: Looking back, ahead (pp. 261–291). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0185-4_13
51.
KamocheK. N.CunhaM. P. E.CunhaJ. V. d. (2002). Organizational improvisation. Routledge.
52.
KamocheK. N.CunhaM. P. E.CunhaJ. V. d. (2003). Towards a theory of organizational improvisation: Looking beyond the jazz metaphor. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 2023–2051. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00410.x
53.
KapucuN. (2006). Interagency communication networks during emergencies. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005280605
54.
KapucuN.BoinA. (Eds.) (2016). Disaster and crisis management: Public management perspectives. Routledge.
55.
KenisP.Janowicz-PanjaitanM.CambéB. (Eds.) (2009). Temporary organizations: Prevalence, logic and effectiveness. Edward Elgar.
56.
KremserW.BlagoevB. (2021). The dynamics of prioritizing: How actors temporally pattern complex role–routine ecologies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(2), 339–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839220948483
57.
Kwak, Y.-H. (2005). Brief history of project management. In E. G.CarayannisF. T.AnbariY.-H.Kwak (Eds.), The story of managing projects: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 1–9). Praeger Publishers.
58.
LagadecP. (2007). Crisis management in the twenty-first century: “Unthinkable” events in “inconceivable” contexts. In RodríguezH.QuarantelliE. L.DynesR. R. (Eds.), Handbooks of sociology and social research: Handbook of disaster research (pp. 489–507). SpringerNew York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_30
59.
LenfleS. (2011). The strategy of parallel approaches in projects with unforeseeable uncertainty: The Manhattan case in retrospect. International Journal of Project Management, 29(4), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.02.001
60.
LenfleS. (2016). Floating in space? On the strangeness of exploratory projects. Project Management Journal, 47(2), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21584
61.
LuhmannN. (1971). Die Knappheit der Zeit und die Vordringlichkeit des Befristeten (The scarcity of time and the urgency of the temporary). In LuhmannN. (Ed.), Politische Planung (Political planning) (pp. 143–164). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-07662-9_9
62.
LuhmannN. (1976). The future cannot begin: Temporal structures in modern society. Social Research, 43(1), 130–152.
63.
LuhmannN. (1984). Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie (Social systems. Outline of a general theory). Suhrkamp.
64.
LuhmannN. (1993). Temporalisierung von Komplexität: Zur Semantik neuzeitlicher Zeitbegriffe (Temporalization of complexity: On the semantics of modern time concepts). In Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft (Social structure and semantics: Studies in the sociology of knowledge in modern society) (pp. 235–301). Suhrkamp.
LundinR. A. (2015). Managing and working in project society: Institutional challenges of temporary organizations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139939454
MeyerM.SimsaR. (2018). Organizing the unexpected: How civil society organizations dealt with the refugee crisis. Voluntas, 29(6), 1159–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-00050-y
MidlerC.NavarreC. (2004). Project management in the automotive industry. In MorrisP. W. G.PintoJ. K. (Eds.), The Wiley guide to managing projects (pp. 1368–1388). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470172391.ch55
72.
MolotchH. (2017). “Just time” and the relativity of speed. In WajcmanJ.DoddN. (Eds.), The sociology of speed: Digital, organizational, and social temporalities (pp. 117–130). Oxford University Press.
73.
MoormanC.MinerA. S. (1998). Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 698–723. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.1255634
74.
MorrisP. W. G. (2012). A brief history of project management. In MorrisP. W. G.PintoJ. K.SöderlundJ. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of project management (pp. 15–36). Oxford University Press.
75.
MoynihanD. P. (2008). Learning under uncertainty: Networks in crisis management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 68(2), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00867.x
76.
NachbagauerA.Schirl-BöckI. (2019). Managing the unexpected in megaprojects: Riding the waves of resilience. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 12(3), 694–715. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-08-2018-0169
77.
NachbagauerA.Schirl-BöckI.WeissE. (2020). Unerwartete Herausforderungen in Projekten erfolgreich managen: Erfahrungen aus der Human-Factors-, Hochsicherheits- und Resilienzforschung (Successfully managing unexpected challenges in projects: Lessons learned from human factors, high reliability, and resilience research). Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60944-6
78.
NiedermanF.LechlerT.PetitY. (2018). A research agenda for extending agile practices in software development and additional task domains. Project Management Journal, 49(6), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972818802713
79.
OkhuysenG. A.BechkyB. A. (2009). Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 463–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520903047533
80.
OrlikowskiW. J.YatesJ. (2002). It's about time: Temporal structuring in organizations. Organization Science, 13(6), 684–700. www.jstor.org/stable/3086088
81.
PerrowC. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologies. Basic Books.
82.
RämöH. (2002). Doing things right and doing the right things: Time and timing in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20(7), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00015-7
83.
ReineckeJ.AnsariS. (2017). Time, temporality, and process studies. In LangleyA.TsoukasH. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of process organization studies (pp. 402–416). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957954.n25
84.
RemingtonK.PollackJ. (2007). Tools for complex projects. Ashgate Publishing.
85.
RosaH. (2015). Social acceleration: New directions for critical theory. Columbia University Press.
86.
SchakelJ. K.van FenemaP. C.FarajS. (2016). Shots fired! Switching between practices in police work. Organization Science, 27(2), 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1048
87.
SchakelJ. K.WolbersJ. (2019). To the edge and beyond: How fast-response organizations adapt in rapidly changing crisis situations. Human Relations74(3), 001872671989345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719893450
88.
SchimankU. (2019). Coping: Entscheiden, wenn das kaum noch möglich ist (Coping: Deciding when it is hardly possible anymore). Leviathan, 47(2), 192–214. https://doi.org/10.5771/0340-0425-2019-2-192
89.
SchützA. (1974). Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt: Eine Einleitung in die verstehende Soziologie (Phenomenology of the social world: An introduction to interpretative sociology). Suhrkamp (Original work published 1932).
90.
SlawinskiN.BansalP. (2017). The paradoxes of time in organizations. In SmithW. K.LewisM. W.JarzabkowskiP.LangleyA. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational paradox (pp. 373–392). Oxford University Press.
StalkG.HoutT. M. (1990). Competing against time: How time-based competition is reshaping global markets. Free Press.
93.
StjerneI. S.SöderlundJ.MinbaevaD. (2019). Crossing times: Temporal boundary-spanning practices in interorganizational projects. International Journal of Project Management, 37(2), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.09.004
94.
StjerneI. S.SvejenovaS. (2016). Connecting temporary and permanent organizing: Tensions and boundary work in sequential film projects. Organization Studies, 37(12), 1771–1792. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616655492
95.
SydowJ.BraunT. (2018). Projects as temporary organizations: An agenda for further theorizing the interorganizational dimension. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.012
Van MarrewijkA.YbemaS.SmitsK.CleggS. R.PitsisT. S. (2016). Clash of the titans: Temporal organizing and collaborative dynamics in the Panama Canal megaproject. Organization Studies, 37(12), 1745–1769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616655489
Waard, E. de, Volberda, H. W., & Soeters, J. (2013). Drivers of organizational responsiveness: Experiences of a military crisis response organization. Journal of Organization Design, 2(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.7146/jod.7850
100.
WeickK. E. (1977). Enactment processes in organizations. In StawB. M.SalancikG. R. (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior (pp. 267–300). St. Clair Press.
WeickK. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393339
103.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. SAGE.
104.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M. (2007). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
WolbersJ.BoersmaK.GroenewegenP. (2018). Introducing a fragmentation perspective on coordination in crisis management. Organization Studies, 39(11), 1521–1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617717095
107.
WolbersJ.GroenewegenP.MolleeJ.BímJ. (2013). Incorporating time dynamics in the analysis of social networks in emergency management. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2013-0019
