Based on social comparison theory and organizational justice, this research explores how Guanxi with the horizontal leader (HL) influences coworker turnover intention. We used the snowball sampling method to collect survey data from 203 employees in 22 project teams. Overall, Guanxi with the HL had an indirect influence on turnover intention through perceived distributive justice pertaining to HL identification. Additionally, procedural justice had a negative, cross-level moderating effect on the relationship between Guanxi with the HL and perceived distributive justice. However, the individual-level moderating role of interactional justice was not supported. Theoretical and managerial implications of these findings are discussed.
AdamsJ. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422–436.doi:10.1037/h0040968
2.
AdamsJ. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2(4), 267–299.
3.
AlonderienėR.MüllerR.PilkienėM.SimkonisS.ChmieliauskasA. (2020). Transitions in balanced leadership in projects: The case of horizontal leaders. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–13.doi:10.1109/TEM.2020.3041609
4.
AquinoK.GriffethR. W.AllenD. G.HomP. W. (1997). Integrating justice constructs into the turnover process: A test of a referent cognitions model. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1208–1227.
5.
AustinW.McGinnN. C.SusmilchC. (1980). Internal standards revisited: Effects of social comparisons and expectancies on judgments of fairness and satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16(5), 426–441.doi:10.1016/0022-1031(80)90049-9
6.
BauerD. J.PreacherK. J.GilK. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11(2), 142–163.doi:10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.142http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16784335
7.
BiesR. J.MoagJ. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. InLewickiR. J.SheppardB. H.BazermanM. H. (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp.3–55). JAI Press.
8.
BrimecombeM. J. (2012). An exploratory investigation of the predictors of counterproductive work behaviors among major league baseball employees [Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University]. DigiNole.
9.
BrislinR. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.doi:10.1177/135910457000100301
10.
BrocknerJ.KimD. H. (1993). Factors affecting stayers’ job satisfaction in response to a coworker who departs for a better job. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(20), 1659–1684.doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01060.x
11.
BuunkA. P.Cohen-SchotanusJ.van NekR. H. (2007). Why and how people engage in social comparison while learning social skills in groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11(3), 140–152.doi:10.1037/1089-2699.11.3.140
12.
ChenX.-P.PengS. (2008). Guanxi dynamics: Shifts in the closeness of ties between Chinese coworkers. Management and Organization Review, 4(1), 63–80.doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00078.x
13.
ChenY.FriedmanR.YuE.FangW.LuX. (2009). Supervisor–subordinate guanxi developing a three-dimensional model and scale. Management and Organization Review, 5(3), 375–399.doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00153.x
14.
ChenY.FriedmanR.YuE.SunF. (2011). Examining the positive and negative effects of guanxi practices: A multi-level analysis of guanxi practices and procedural justice perceptions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(4), 715–735.doi:10.1007/s10490-009-9176-x
15.
CheungM. F. Y.WuW.-P.ChanA. K. K.WongM. M. L. (2009). Supervisor–subordinate guanxi and employee work outcomes: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(S1), 77–89.doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9830-0
16.
ChihY.-Y.KiazadK.ZhouL.CapezioA.LiM.D. RestubogS. L. (2016). Investigating employee turnover in the construction industry: A psychological contract perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(6), 04016006.doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001101
17.
CollieR. J.MartinA. J.PapworthB.GinnsP. (2016). Students’ interpersonal relationships, personal best (PB) goals, and academic engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 45(5), 65–76.doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.002
18.
CollinsR. L. (1996). For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 51–69.doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.51
19.
ColquittJ. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11419799
20.
ColquittJ. A.GreenbergJ.Zapata-PhelanC. P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. InGreenbergJ.ColquittJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp.3–56). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21.
ColquittJ. A.JacksonC. L. (2006). Justice in teams: The context sensitivity of justice rules across individual and team contexts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(4), 868–899.doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00047.x
22.
ConwayJ. M.LanceC. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325–334.doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6
23.
CropanzanoR.PreharC. A.ChenP. Y. (2002). Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group & Organization Management, 27(3), 324–351.doi:10.1177/1059601102027003002
24.
DaileylR. C.KirkD. J. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as antecedents of job dissatisfaction and intent to turnover. Human Relations, 45(3), 305–317.doi:10.1177/001872679204500306
25.
DietzJ.RobinsonS. L.FolgerR.BaronR. A.SchulzM. (2003). The impact of community violence and an organization’s procedural justice climate on workplace aggression. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 317–326.
26.
DuJ.ZhouC. (2019). Does guanxi matter in the foreign expansion of Chinese manufacturing firms? The mediator role of linking and leveraging. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36(2), 473–497.doi:10.1007/s10490-018-9613-9
27.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.doi:10.1177/001872675400700202
28.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
29.
GreenbergJ. (2004). Stress fairness to fare no stress: Managing workplace stress by promoting organizational justice. Organizational Dynamics, 33(4), 352–365.
30.
GreenbergJ.Ashton-JamesC. E.AshkanasyN. M. (2007). Social comparison processes in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(1), 22–41.doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.006
31.
HeW.FehrR.YamK. C.LongL.-R.HaoP. (2017). Interactional justice, leader-member exchange, and employee performance: Examining the moderating role of justice differentiation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(4), 537–557.doi:10.1002/job.2133
32.
HofmannD. A.GavinM. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24(5), 623–641.doi:10.1177/014920639802400504
33.
HoggM. A.AbramsD.BrewerM. B. (2017). Social identity: The role of self in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(5), 570–581.doi:10.1177/1368430217690909
34.
HorakS.TaubeM. (2016). Same but different? Similarities and fundamental differences of informal social networks in China (guanxi) and Korea (yongo). Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(3), 595–616.doi:10.1007/s10490-015-9452-x
35.
HussainM.KhanM. S. (2019). Organizational justice and turnover intentions: Probing the Pakistani print media sector. Evidence-based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 7(2), 180–197.doi:10.1108/EBHRM-04-2018-0030
36.
JamesE. H. (2000). Race-related differences in promotions and support: Underlying effects of human and social capital. Organization Science, 11(5), 493–508.doi:10.1287/orsc.11.5.493.15202
37.
KimS.-W.PriceJ. L.MuellerC. W.WatsonT. W. (1996). The determinants of career intent among physicians at a U.S. Air Force hospital. Human Relations, 49(7), 947–976.doi:10.1177/001872679604900704
38.
LawK. S.WongC.-S.WangD.WangL. (2000). Effect of supervisor–subordinate guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: An empirical investigation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(4), 751–765.doi:10.1080/09585190050075105
39.
LiA.CropanzanoR. (2009a). Do east Asians respond more/less strongly to organizational justice than North Americans? A meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 787–805.doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00825.x
40.
LiA.CropanzanoR. (2009b). Fairness at the group level: Justice climate and intraunit justice climate. Journal of Management, 35(3), 564–599.doi:10.1177/0149206308330557
41.
LiY.LuY.CuiQ.HanY. (2019). Organizational behavior in megaprojects: Integrative review and directions for future research. Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(4), 04019009.doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000691
42.
LindE. A.BosK. V. D. (2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24(2), 181–223.doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24006-X
43.
LuoJ.-D.ChengM.-Y. (2015). Guanxi Circles’ effect on organizational trust. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(8), 1024–1037.doi:10.1177/0002764215580612
44.
MartinJ. (1979). Relative deprivation: A theory of distributive injustice for an era of shrinking resources. Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.
45.
MenonT.ThompsonL. (2010). Envy at work. Harvard Business Review, 88(4), 74–79.
MolinerC.CropanzanoR.Martínez-TurV. (2017). Organizational justice: International perspectives and conceptual advances. Routledge.
48.
MoormanR. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845–855.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.845
49.
MüllerR.NikolovaN.SankaranS.HaseS.ZhuF.XuX.VaagaasarA.DrouinN. (2016). Leading projects by balancing vertical and horizontal leadership–International case studies. Proceedings of EURAM 2016, June 1–4, Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.05.011
50.
MüllerR.SankaranS.DrouinN.VaagaasarA.-L.BekkerM. C.JainK. (2018). A theory framework for balancing vertical and horizontal leadership in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 83–94.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.003
51.
MüllerR.ZhuF.SunX.WangL.YuM. (2018). The identification of temporary horizontal leaders in projects: The case of China. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 95–107.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.05.011
52.
MurphyS. M.WayneS. J.LidenR. C.ErdoganB. (2003). Understanding social loafing: The role of justice perceptions and exchange relationships. Human Relations, 56(1), 61–84.doi:10.1177/0018726703056001450
NaumannS. E.BennettN. (2000). A case for procedural justice climate: Development and test of a multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 881–889.
55.
OsmanI.NoordinF. (2015). The impact of organisational justice, organisational trust and teamwork on talent retention: Mediating role of organisational citizenship behaviour. Advanced Science Letters, 21(5), 1464–1467.doi:10.1166/asl.2015.6072
56.
PilkienėM.AlonderienėR.ChmieliauskasA.ŠimkonisS.MüllerR. (2018). The governance of horizontal leadership in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 36(7), 913–924.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.06.002
57.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14516251
58.
PreacherK. J.SeligJ. P. (2010, July). Monte Carlo method for assessing multilevel mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects in 1-1-1 multilevel models [Computer software]. http://quantpsy.org/
59.
PreacherK. J.ZyphurM. J.ZhangZ. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209–233.doi:10.1037/a0020141http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20822249
60.
PretoriusS.SteynH.Bond-BarnardT. J. (2017). Exploring project-related factors that influence leadership styles and their effect on project performance: A conceptual framework. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 28(4), 95–108.doi:10.7166/28-4-1778
61.
PriceJ. L. (1997). Handbook of organizational measurement. International Journal of Manpower, 18(4/5/6), 305–558.doi:10.1108/01437729710182260
62.
SankaranS.VaagaasarA. L.BekkerM. C. (2019). Assignment of project team members to projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(6), 1381–1402.doi:10.1108/IJMPB-12-2018-0285
63.
SaundersM.LewisP.ThornhillA. (2009). Research methods for business students (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
64.
Scott-YoungC.SamsonD. (2008). Project success and project team management: Evidence from capital projects in the process industries. Journal of Operations Management, 26(6), 749–766.doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.10.006
65.
Scott-YoungC. M.GeorgyM.GrisingerA. (2019). Shared leadership in project teams: An integrative multi-level conceptual model and research agenda. International Journal of Project Management, 37(4), 565–581.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.02.002
66.
SherfE. N.VenkataramaniV. (2015). Friend or foe? The impact of relational ties with comparison others on outcome fairness and satisfaction judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 128(1), 1–14.doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.02.002
SweeneyP. D.McFarlinD. B. (2005). Wage comparisons with similar and dissimilar others. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(1), 113–131.doi:10.1348/096317904X23808
71.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. SAGE.
72.
TellyC. S.FrenchW. L.ScottW. G. (1971). The relationship of inequity to turnover among hourly workers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(2), 164–172.doi:10.2307/2391826
73.
TörnblomK. Y.VermuntR. (1999). An integrative perspective on social justice: Distributive and procedural fairness evaluations of positive and negative outcome allocations. Social Justice Research, 12(1), 39–64.doi:10.1023/A:1023226307252
74.
TripathiK. K.HasanA.Neeraj JhaK. (2019). Evaluating performance of construction organizations using fuzzy preference relation technique. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(2), 1–14.doi:10.1080/15623599.2019.1613210
75.
UnterhitzenbergerC.BrydeD. J. (2019). Organizational justice, project performance, and the mediating effects of key success factors. Project Management Journal, 50(1), 57–70.doi:10.1177/8756972818808984
76.
YangF.LiX.SongZ.LiY.ZhuY. (2018). Job burnout of construction project managers: Considering the role of organizational justice. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(11), 04018103.doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001567
77.
YuM.VaagaasarA. L.MüllerR.WangL.ZhuF. (2018). Empowerment: The key to horizontal leadership in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 36(7), 992–1006.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.04.003
78.
ZhuF.WangL.SunM.SunX.MüllerR. (2019). Influencing factors of horizontal leaders’ role identity in projects: A sequential mixed method approach. International Journal of Project Management, 37(4), 582–598.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.02.006
