Project managers commonly adopt suboptimal work plans, even when optimal plans are readily accessible. This research identifies a factor that elicits this seemingly irrational behavior: the perceived complexity of the optimal work plan, as reflected in the plan’s Gantt chart representation. Four controlled experiments show that among experienced project managers presented with a work plan explicitly stated to be optimal, those who view a low-complexity plan are more likely to adopt the plan compared with project managers who view a high-complexity plan. Work-related stress triggered by exposure to the work plan is shown to mediate the effect.
AliA. S. B.AnbariF. T.MoneyW. H. (2008). Impact of organizational and project factors on acceptance and usage of project management software and perceived project success. Project Management Journal, 39(2), 5–33.
2.
ArgoteL.InskoC. A.YovetichN.RomeroA. A. (1995). Group learning curves: The effects of turnover and task complexity on group performance 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(6), 512–529.doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01765.x
3.
AshbyW. R.PierceJ. R. (1957). An introduction to cybernetics (pp.34–36). Chapman & Hall Ltd.doi:10.1063/1.3060436
4.
AustinS.NewtonA.SteeleJ.WaskettP. (2002). Modelling and managing project complexity. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 191–198.doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00068-0
5.
BarretoA.BarrosM. D. O.WernerC. M. L. (2008). Staffing a software project: A constraint satisfaction and optimization-based approach. Computers & Operations Research, 35(10), 3073–3089.doi:10.1016/j.cor.2007.01.010
6.
BaucellsM.Grushka-CockayneY.HwangW. (2018). The effects of mental accounting on project performance (Vol. 35). HEC Paris Research Paper No. MOSI-2018-1317.doi:10.2139/ssrn.3265724
7.
BeehrT. A.FranzT. M. (1987). The current debate about the meaning of job stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 8(2), 5–18.doi:10.1300/J075v08n02_02
8.
BjorvatnT.WaldA. (2018). Project complexity and team-level absorptive capacity as drivers of project management performance. International Journal of Project Management, 36(6), 876–888.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.05.003
9.
BlazewiczJ.LenstraJ. K.KanA. H. G. R. (1983). Scheduling subject to resource constraints: Classification and complexity. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 5(1), 11–24.doi:10.1016/0166-218X(83)90012-4
10.
Bosch-RekveldtM.BakkerH.HertoghM. (2018). Comparing project complexity across different industry sectors. Complexity, 2018(2), 1–15.doi:10.1155/2018/3246508
11.
BradyT.DaviesA. (2014). Managing structural and dynamic complexity: A tale of two projects. Project Management Journal, 45(4), 21–38.doi:10.1002/pmj.21434
12.
BrownR. (2004). Consideration of the origin of Herbert Simon’s theory of “satisficing” (1933–1947). Management Decision, 42(10), 1240–1256.doi:10.1108/00251740410568944
13.
CarvalhoL.SilvermanD. (2019). Complexity and sophistication. NBER Working Paper No. w26036. National Bureau of Economic Research.
14.
CebeciU. (2019). The project management of industry 4.0 strategy for software houses. InBolatH. B.TemurG. T. (Eds.), Agile approaches for successfully managing and executing projects in the fourth industrial revolution (pp.228–241). IGI Global.
15.
DayaniM.GelbardR. (2017). Software project planning through simulation of entire project’s problem-space. International Journal of Information Technology Project Management, 8(3), 22–39.doi:10.4018/IJITPM.2017070102
16.
DharR. (1997). Consumer preference for a no-choice option. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 215–231.doi:10.1086/209506
17.
DunovićI. B.RadujkovićM.ŠkrebK. A. (2014). Towards a new model of complexity: The case of large infrastructure projects. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 730–738.doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.082
18.
EfronR. (1969). What is perception?InProceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the philosophy of science 1966/1968 (pp.137–173). Springer, Dordrecht.
19.
ElbeltagiE.HegazyT.GriersonD. (2005). Comparison among five evolutionary-based optimization algorithms. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 19(1), 43–53.doi:10.1016/j.aei.2005.01.004
20.
ElbeltagiE.HegazyT.GriersonD. (2007). A modified shuffled frog-leaping optimization algorithm: Applications to project management. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 3(1), 53–60.doi:10.1080/15732470500254535
21.
EllinasC.AllanN.JohanssonA. (2018). Toward project complexity evaluation: A structural perspective. IEEE Systems Journal, 12(1), 228–239.doi:10.1109/JSYST.2016.2562358
22.
EusuffM. M.LanseyK. E. (2003). Optimization of water distribution network design using the shuffled frog leaping algorithm. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 129(3), 210–225.doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2003)129:3(210)
23.
FinnertyA.KucherbaevP.TranquilliniS.ConvertinoG. (2013). Keep it simple: Reward and task design in crowdsourcing[Conference session]. Proceedings of the Biannual Conference of the Italian Chapter of SIGCHI. ACM Digital Library, New York.
24.
GemündenH. G. (2014). From the editor: Project management as a behavioral discipline and as driver of productivity and innovations. Project Management Journal, 45(6), 2–6.
25.
GeraldiJ.LechlerT. (2012). Gantt charts revisited: A critical analysis of its roots and implications to the management of projects today. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(4), 578–594.
26.
GrudenN.StareA. (2018). The influence of behavioral competencies on project performance. Project Management Journal, 49(3), 98–109.doi:10.1177/8756972818770841
27.
HalloL.GorodA.MorrissA. (2018, Jun). Toward “satisficing” creativity effort within project management. InFoldsD. J.BerndtJ. O. (Eds.), HUSO 2018: The Fourth International Conference on Human and Social Analytics, Venice, Italy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326095587.
28.
HuiC.LeeC. (2000). Moderating effects of organization-based self-esteem on organizational uncertainty: Employee response relationships. Journal of Management, 26(2), 215–232.doi:10.1177/014920630002600203
29.
KadeforsA. (2004). Trust in project relationships—Inside the black box. International Journal of Project Management, 22(3), 175–182.doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00031-0
KelleyJ.WalkerM. (1959). Critical path planning and scheduling: An introduction. Mauchly Associates.
32.
KelleyJ. E. (1961). Critical path planning and scheduling: Mathematical basis. Operations Research, 9(3), 296–320.doi:10.1287/opre.9.3.296
33.
LeeA. Y.LabrooA. A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 151–165.doi:10.1509/jmkr.41.2.151.28665
34.
LiC.-L.HallN. G. (2019). Work package sizing and project performance. Operations Research, 67(1), 123–142.doi:10.1287/opre.2018.1767
35.
LunenburgF. C. (2011). Goal-setting theory of motivation. International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration, 15(1), 1–6.
36.
LynnM.FlynnS. M.HelionC. (2013). Do consumers prefer round prices? Evidence from pay-what-you-want decisions and self-pumped gasoline purchases. Journal of Economic Psychology, 36, 96–102.doi:10.1016/j.joep.2013.01.010
37.
MaqboolR.SudongY.ManzoorN.RashidY. (2017). The impact of emotional intelligence, project managers’ competencies, and transformational leadership on project success: An empirical perspective. Project Management Journal, 48(3), 58–75.doi:10.1177/875697281704800304
38.
McHughM. (1993). Stress at work: Do managers really count the costs?Employee Relations, 15(1), 18–32.doi:10.1108/01425459310024901
39.
MetzlE. S.MorrellM. A. (2008). The role of creativity in models of resilience: Theoretical exploration and practical applications. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 3(3), 303–318.doi:10.1080/15401380802385228
40.
MikkelsenM. F. (2021). Perceived project complexity: A survey among practitioners of project management. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(3), 680–698.doi:10.1108/IJMPB-03-2020-0095
41.
MüllerR.GeraldiJ.TurnerJ. R. (2011). Relationships between leadership and success in different types of project complexities. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(1), 77–90.doi:10.1109/TEM.2011.2114350
42.
MurphyL. R. (1995). Managing job stress: An employee assistance/human resource management partnership. Personnel Review, 24(1), 41–50.
43.
ParkJ.LuF.-C.HedgcockW. M. (2017). Relative effects of forward and backward planning on goal pursuit. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1620–1630.doi:10.1177/095679761771551028910234
44.
Poveda-BautistaR.Diego-MasJ.-A.Leon-MedinaD. (2018). Measuring the project management complexity: The case of information technology projects. Complexity, 2018(7), 1–19.doi:10.1155/2018/6058480
45.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.doi:10.1080/0027317070134131626821081
46.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide)– Sixth edition. Author.
47.
PugliesiK. (1999). The consequences of emotional labor: Effects on work stress, job satisfaction, and well-being. Motivation and Emotion, 23(2), 125–154.doi:10.1023/A:1021329112679
48.
RahimM. A. (2017). Managing conflict in organizations. Routledge.
49.
San CristóbalJ. R.CarralL.DiazE.FraguelaJ. A.IglesiasG. (2018). Complexity and project management: A general overview. Complexity, 2018, 1–10.doi:10.1155/2018/4891286
50.
SchabracqM. J.CooperC. L. (2000). The changing nature of work and stress. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(3), 227–241.doi:10.1108/02683940010320589
51.
SharpN. A.EnziJ.FountoulakisE.LamB.RabbiorM. C. (2009). U.S. patent application No. 12/018,964.
52.
ShenharA. J. (2001). One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science, 47(3), 394–414.doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.3.394.9772
53.
ShenharA. J.DvirD. (2007). Reinventing project management: The diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Harvard Business Review Press.
54.
ShiromA.TokerS.MelamedS.BerlinerS.ShapiraI. (2010). Vigor, anxiety, and depressive symptoms as predictors of changes in fibrinogen and C-reactive protein. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 2(3), 251–271.doi:10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01033.x
55.
SimonH. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129–138.doi:10.1037/h004276913310708
56.
SimonH. A. (1959). Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. The American Economic Review, 49(3), 253–283.
57.
SimonH. A. (1978). On how to decide what to do. The Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 494–507.doi:10.2307/3003595
58.
SimonH. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press.
59.
SimonH. A. (2013). Administrative behavior. Simon and Schuster.
60.
SimonH. A.BarnardC. (1947). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. Macmillan.
61.
SzewczakE.SnodgrassC. (2002). Human factors in information systems. IGI Global.
62.
TverskyA.ShafirE. (1992). Choice under conflict: The dynamics of deferred decision. Psychological Science, 3(6), 358–361.doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00047.x
63.
VakolaM.NikolaouI. (2005). Attitudes towards organizational change: What is the role of employees’ stress and commitment?Employee Relations, 27(2), 160–174.
64.
VanhouckeM.WautersM. (2015). Blended learning in project management. InProceedings of the 7th International Conference on computer supported education (Vol. 2, pp.267–276). SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications.
65.
WalkerM.SawyerJ. (1959). Project planning and scheduling. Technical Report 6959, E.I. duPont de Nemours and Co., Wilmington, Delaware.
66.
WangH. J.LuC. Q.SiuO. L. (2015). Job insecurity and job performance: The moderating role of organizational justice and the mediating role of work engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1249–1258.doi:10.1037/a003833025402953
67.
WautersM.VanhouckeM. (2016). A study on complexity and uncertainty perception and solution strategies for the time/cost trade-off problem. Project Management Journal, 47(4), 29–50.doi:10.1177/875697281604700404
XieJ. L.JohnsG. (1995). Job scope and stress: Can job scope be too high?Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1288–1309.doi:10.5465/256858
70.
ZamanU.JabbarZ.NawazS.AbbasM. (2019). Understanding the soft side of software projects: An empirical study on the interactive effects of social skills and political skills on complexity –performance relationship. International Journal of Project Management, 37(3), 444–460.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.015
