In this special issue, we encouraged project scholars to be bold and construct their voices. We now reflect on the results, which include the bright spots in four areas: project organizing (organizing and collaborating in and between projects), project value (organizing value in and through projects), project citizenship (living in and through projects), and project scholarship (reflecting on project theorizing and scholarship). We then dared to voice our views on three dark spots: a lack of diversity in the project scholars’ ethnicities, geographies, and genders; in disciplines that extend beyond management and organization studies; and in modes of reflexivity.
AdlerN.GhadarF. (1993). A strategic phase approach to international human resource management. InWong-RiegerD.RiegerF. (Eds.), International management research: Looking to the future (pp.136–161). Walter De Gruyter.
2.
AguinisH.CummingsC.RamaniR. S.CummingsT. G. (2020). “An a is an a”: The new bottom line for valuing academic research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(1), 135–154.doi:10.5465/amp.2017.0193
3.
AlvessonM.GabrielY. (2013). Beyond formulaic research: In praise of greater diversity in organizational research and publications. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(2), 245–263.doi:10.5465/amle.2012.0327
4.
ArcherM. S. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge University Press.
5.
BerglundK.LindgrenM.PackendorffJ. (2020). The worthy human being as prosuming subject: ‘Projectified selves’ in emancipatory project studies. Project Management Journal, 51(4), 367–377.doi:10.1177/8756972820930534
6.
BourdieuP. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity. Polity Press.
7.
BraunT.Müller-SeitzG.SydowJ. (2012). Project citizenship behavior? An explorative analysis at the project-network-nexus. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 28(4), 271–284.doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2012.05.008
8.
CarlsenA.PitsisT. S. (2020). We are projects: Narrative capital and meaning making in projects. Project Management Journal, 51(4), 357–366.doi:10.1177/8756972820929479
9.
CourpassonD. (2013). On the erosion of ‘passionate scholarship’. Organization Studies, 34(9), 1243–1249.doi:10.1177/0170840613502292
10.
DaviesA.ManningS.SöderlundJ. (2018). When neighboring disciplines fail to learn from each other: The case of innovation and project management research. Research Policy, 47(5), 965–979.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.002
11.
De MolliF.MengisJ.van MarrewijkA. (2020). The aestheticization of hybrid space: The atmosphere of the Locarno film festival. Organization Studies, 41(11), 1491–1512.doi:10.1177/0170840619867348
12.
DrouinN.SankaranS.van MarrewijkA.MüllerR. (2021). Megaproject leaders: Reflections on personal life stories. Edward Elgar Publishing.
13.
DunfordR.JonesD. (2000). Narrative in strategic change. Human Relations, 53(9), 1207–1226.doi:10.1177/0018726700539005
14.
FlormanS. C. (1996). The existential pleasure of engineering. St. Martin’s Griffin.
15.
FlyvbjergB. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19.doi:10.1002/pmj.21409
16.
GabrielY. (2016). The essay as an endangered species: Should we care?Journal of Management Studies, 53(2), 244–249.doi:10.1111/joms.12176
17.
GeraldiJ.SöderlundJ. (2016). Project studies and engaged scholarship. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 9(4), 767–797.doi:10.1108/IJMPB-02-2016-0016
18.
GeraldiJ.SöderlundJ.MarrewijkA. van. (2020). Advancing theory and debate in project studies. Project Management Journal, 51(4), 351–356.doi:10.1177/8756972820932002
19.
GrabherG. (2002). Cool projects, boring institutions: Temporary collaboration in social context. Regional Studies, 36(3), 205–214.doi:10.1080/00343400220122025
20.
HardyC.CleggS. (1997). Relativity without relativism: Reflexivity in post-paradigm organization studies. British Journal of Management, 8(s1), 5–17.doi:10.1111/1467-8551.8.s1.2
21.
HayesD.WynyardR. (2002). The McDonaldization of higher education. Bergin and Garvey.
22.
HernesT. (2007). Understanding organization as process: Theory for a tangled world. Routledge.
23.
HirschmanA. O. (1967). Development projects observed. Brookings Institution Press.
24.
HornsteinH. A. (2015). The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 291–298.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.005
25.
IkaL. A.SöderlundJ.MunroL. T.LandoniP. (2020). When project management meets international development, what can we learn?International Journal of Project Management, 38(8), 469–473.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.10.004
26.
JacobssonM.SöderholmA. (2020). Project studies beyond the straitjacket: An escape artist’s manual. Project Management Journal, 51(4), 411–419.doi:10.1177/8756972820929916
27.
JarzabkowskiP.LêJ.SpeeP. (2017). Taking a strong process approach to analyzing qualitative process data. InLangleyA.TsoukasH. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of process organization studies (pp.237–253). SAGE.
28.
JensenA.ThuesenC.GeraldiJ. (2016). The projectification of everything: Projects as a human condition. Project Management Journal, 47(3), 21–34.doi:10.1177/875697281604700303
29.
JonesC.HesterlyW. S.Fladmoe-LindquistK.BorgattiS. P. (1998). Professional service constellations: How strategies and capabilities influence collaborative stability and change. Organization Science, 9(3), 396–410.doi:10.1287/orsc.9.3.396
30.
KreinerK. (2020). Conflicting notions of a project: The battle between Albert O. Hirschman and Bent Flyvbjerg. Project Management Journal, 51(4), 400–410.doi:10.1177/8756972820930535
31.
LundinR. A.ArvidssonN.BradyT.EkstedtE.MidlerC.SydowJ. C. M.SydowJ. (2015). Managing and working in project society. Cambridge University Press.
32.
LundinR. A.SöderholmA. (1995). A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 437–455.doi:10.1016/0956-5221(95)00036-U
33.
MarkardJ.RavenR.TrufferB. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
34.
MartinsuoM. (2020). The management of values in project business: Adjusting beliefs to transform project practices and outcomes. Project Management Journal, 51(4), 389–399.doi:10.1177/8756972820927890
35.
ObstfeldD. (2012). Creative projects: A less routine approach toward getting new things done. Organization Science, 23(6), 1571–1592.doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0706
36.
OrlikowskiW. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.doi:10.1177/0170840607081138
37.
Pantic-DragisicS.SöderlundJ. (2020). Swift transition and knowledge cycling: Key capabilities for successful technical and engineering consulting?Research Policy, 49(1), 103880.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.103880
38.
SergiV.CrevaniL.AubryM. (2020). Process studies of project organizing. Project Management Journal, 51(1), 3–10.doi:10.1177/8756972819896482
39.
SöderlundJ.MaylorH. (2012). Project management scholarship: Relevance, impact and five integrative challenges for business and management schools. International Journal of Project Management, 30(6), 686–696.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.03.007
40.
StinglV.GeraldiJ. (2017). Errors, lies and misunderstandings: Framing the literature on decision behaviour in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(2), 121–135.
41.
StyhreA. (2020). Thinly and thickly capitalized projects: Theorizing the role of the finance markets and capital supply in project management studies. Project Management Journal, 51(4), 378–388.doi:10.1177/8756972820931278
42.
SveningssonS.AlvessonM. (2016). Managerial lives: Leadership and identity in an imperfect world. Cambridge University Press.
43.
ThielJ.GrabherG. (2015). Crossing boundaries: Exploring the London Olympics 2012 as a field-configuring event. Industry and Innovation, 22(3), 229–249.doi:10.1080/13662716.2015.1033841
44.
TourishD. (2020). The triumph of nonsense in management studies. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(1), 99–109.doi:10.5465/amle.2019.0255
45.
TsoukasH. (2017). Don’t simplify, complexify: From disjunctive to conjunctive theorizing in organization and management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 54(2), 132–153.doi:10.1111/joms.12219
46.
TywoniakS.LavignonI.BredilletC. (2021). A pragmatist approach to complexity theorizing in project studies: Orders and levels. Project Management Journal, 52(3), 298–313.
47.
VaagaasarA. L.HernesT.DilleT. (2020). The challenges of implementing temporal shifts in temporary organizations: Implications of a situated temporal view. Project Management Journal, 51(4), 420–428.doi:10.1177/8756972820931276
48.
van MarrewijkA.DessingN. (2019). Negotiating reciprocal relationships: Practices of engaged scholarship in project studies. International Journal of Project Management, 37(7), 884–895.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.07.001
49.
van MarrewijkA.YbemaS.SmitsK.CleggS.PitsisT. (2016). Clash of the titans: Temporal organizing and collaborative dynamics in the Panama Canal Megaproject. Organization Studies, 37(12), 1745–1769.doi:10.1177/0170840616655489
50.
WangL.ZhuF. (2021). Attention and mindfulness: A tale of two megaprojects. InDrouinN.ShankaranS.van MarrewijkA. H. (Eds.), Megaproject leaders: Reflections on personal life stories (pp.200–213). Edward Elgar Publishing.
51.
WeickK. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 516–531.doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308376
52.
WinchG. M. (2014). Three domains of project organising. International Journal of Project Management, 32(5), 721–731.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.012
53.
Zika-ViktorssonA.SundströmP.EngwallM. (2006). Project overload: An exploratory study of work and management in multi-project settings. International Journal of Project Management, 24(5), 385–394.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.02.010
