While the governance of Western megaprojects is indirectly influenced by governments through legislation and regulations, the Chinese state actively oversees and controls projects of societal importance. To provide clarity on the role of the state in Chinese megaprojects, we carried out a case study focusing on EXPO 2010 Shanghai. Our analysis revealed that through a project-specific organization Construction Headquarter (CHQ), the Chinese state executes administrative strength, forces authorities to temporarily integrate their processes for the benefit of the project, influences contractor and resource selection decisions, induces leadership accountability, and promotes shared project values.
AaltonenK., KujalaJ., & OijalaT. (2008). Stakeholder salience in global projects.International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), 509–516.
2.
AaltonenK., & SivonenR. (2009). Response strategies to stakeholder pressures in global projects.International Journal of Project Management, 27(2), 131–141.
3.
AbednegoM. P., & OgunlanaS. O. (2006). Good project governance for proper risk allocation in public–private partnerships in Indonesia.International Journal of Project Management, 24(7), 622–634.
4.
AholaT., KujalaJ., LaaksonenT., & AaltonenK. (2013). Constructing the market position of a project-based firm.International Journal of Project Management, 31(3), 355–365.
5.
AholaT., RuuskaI., ArttoK., & KujalaJ. (2014). What is project governance and what are its origins?International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1321–1332.
6.
AronsonZ. H., ShenharA. J., & PatanakulP. (2013). Managing the intangible aspects of a project: The affect of vision, artifacts, and leader values on project spirit and success in technology-driven projects.Project Management Journal, 44(1), 35–58.
7.
ArttoK., ElorantaK., & KujalaJ. (2008). Subcontractors’ business relationships as risk sources in project networks.International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1(1), 88–105.
8.
Association for Project Management (APM). (2004). Directing changes: A guide to governance of project management.High Wycombe, England: Author.
9.
AubryM., MüllerR., & GlücklerJ. (2011). Exploring PMOs through community of practice theory.Project Management Journal, 42(5), 42–56.
10.
BiggartN. W., & GuillénM. F. (1999). Developing difference: Social organization and the rise of the auto industries of South Korea, Taiwan, Spain, and Argentina.American Sociological Review, 722–747.
11.
BradyT., DaviesA., GannD., & RushH. (2007). Learning to manage mega projects: The case of BAA and Heathrow Terminal 5.Project Perspectives, XIXX, 32–39.
12.
ChangC. L. H. (2013). The relationship among power types, political games, game players, and information system project outcomes: A multiple-case study.International Journal of Project Management, 31(1), 57–67.
13.
ChenP., & PartingtonD. (2004). An interpretive comparison of Chinese and Western conceptions of relationships in construction project management work.International Journal of Project Management, 22(5), 397–406.
14.
ChiC. S. F., RuuskaI., LevittR., AholaT., & ArttoK. (2011). A relational governance approach for megaprojects: Case studies of Beijing T3 and Bird's Nest projects in China. Paper presented at the Engineering Project Organizations Conference, Estes Park, Colorado.
15.
CovaB., GhauriP. N., & SalleR. (2002). Project marketing: Beyond competitive bidding.West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
16.
CrawfordL., Cooke-DaviesT., HobbsB., LabuschagneL., RemingtonK., & ChenP. (2008). Governance and support in the sponsoring of projects and programs.Project Management Journal, 39(S1), S43–S55.
17.
DaviesA., & MackenzieI. (2014). Project complexity and systems integration: Constructing the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics Games.International Journal of Project Management, 32(5), 773–790.
18.
FassinY. (2009). The stakeholder model refined.Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 113–135.
19.
FlyvbjergB. (2011). Over budget, over time, over and over again: Managing major projects. In MorrisP., PintoJ. K., & SöderlundJ. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of project management (pp. 321–344). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
20.
GunnarsonS., & LevittR. E. (1982). Is a building construction project a hierarchy or a market? Paper presented at the 7th INTERNET Congress.
21.
HobdayM., DaviesA., & PrencipeA. (2005). Systems integration: A core capability of the modern corporation.Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(6), 1109–1143.
22.
KharbandaO. P., & PintoJ. K. (1996). What made Gertie gallop? Lessons from project failures.New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
23.
KimH. J., & ReinschmidtK. F. (2011). Market structure and organizational performance of construction organizations.Journal of Management in Engineering, 28(2), 212–220.
24.
KlakeggO. J., & HaavaldsenT. (2011). Governance of major public investment projects: In pursuit of relevance and sustainability.International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 4(1), 157–167.
25.
KlakeggO. J., WilliamsT., MagnussenO. M., & GlasspoolH. (2008). Governance frameworks for public project development and estimation.Project Management Journal, 39(S1), S27–S42.
26.
LeY., RenJ., XieL., JiangW., & WangJ. (2009). The root of complexity in EXPO 2010 Shanghai (Chinese Version).Construction Economy, 11, 99–101.
27.
LenfleS., & LochC. (2010). Lost roots: How project management came to emphasize control over flexibility and novelty.California Management Review, 53(1), 32–55.
28.
LevittR. E., HeniszW., ScottW. R., & SettelD. (2010). Governance challenges of infrastructure delivery: The case for socio-economic governance approaches. In RuwanpuraJ., MohamedY., & LeeS. (Eds.), Construction Research Congress 2010 (pp. 757–767). Banff, Canada: American Society of Civil Engineers.
29.
LiS. X., YaoX., Sue-ChanC., & XiY. (2011b). Where do social ties come from: Institutional framework and governmental tie distribution among Chinese managers.Management and Organization Review, 7(1), 97–124.
30.
LiY., LuY., KwakY. H., LeY., & HeQ. (2011a). Social network analysis and organizational control in complex projects: Construction of EXPO 2010 in China.Engineering Project Organization Journal, 1(4), 223–237.
31.
ManzenreiterW. (2010). The Beijing Games in the western imagination of China: The weak power of soft power.Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 34(1), 29–48.
32.
MeierS. R. (2010). Causal inferences on the cost overruns and schedule delays of large-scale U.S. federal defense and intelligence acquisition programs.Project Management Journal, 41(1), 28–39.
33.
MilesM. B., HubermanA. M., & SaldañaJ. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
34.
MillerC. C., CardinalL. B., & GlickW. H. (1997). Retrospective reports in organizational research: A reexamination of recent evidence.Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 189–204.
35.
MillerR., & HobbsB. (2005). Governance regimes for large complex projects.Project Management Journal36(3), 42–50.
36.
MillerR., & LessardD. R. (2001). The strategic management of large engineering projects: Shaping institutions, risks, and governance.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
37.
MorrisP. W., & HoughG. H. (1987). The anatomy of major projects: A study of the reality of project management.Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons.
38.
MüllerR., AndersenE. S., KvalnesØ., ShaoJ., SankaranS., Rodney TurnerJ., BiesenthalC., WalkerD., & GuderganS. (2013). The interrelationship of governance, trust, and ethics in temporary organizations.Project Management Journal, 44(4), 26–44.
39.
NgA., & LoosemoreM. (2007). Risk allocation in the private provision of public infrastructure.International Journal of Project Management, 25(1), 66–76.
40.
OlanderS., & LandinA. (2005). Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects.International Journal of Project Management, 23(4), 321–328.
41.
OlaniranO. J., LoveP. E. D., EdwardsD., OlatunjiO. A., & MatthewsJ. (2015). Cost overruns in hydrocarbon megaprojects: A critical review and implications for research.Project Management Journal, 46(6), 126–138.
42.
PitsisT. S., CleggS. R., MarosszekyM., & Rura-PolleyT. (2003). Constructing the Olympic dream: A future perfect strategy of project management.Organization Science, 14(5), 574–590.
43.
PrykeS. (2006). Projects as networks of relationships. In PrykeS., & SmythH. (Eds.), The management of complex projects: A relationship approach (pp. 213–235). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
44.
RuuskaI., AholaT., ArttoK., LocatelliG., & ManciniM. (2011). A new governance approach for multi-firm projects: Lessons from Olkiluoto 3 and Flamanville 3 nuclear power plant projects.International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 647–660.
45.
SallinenL., AholaT., & RuuskaI. (2011). Governmental stakeholder and project owner's views on the regulative framework in nuclear projects.Project Management Journal, 42(6), 33–47.
46.
SallinenL., RuuskaI., & AholaT. (2013). How governmental stakeholders influence large projects: The case of nuclear power plant projects.International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6(1), 51–68.
47.
ShanM., ChanA. P., LeY., & HuY. (2015). Investigating the effectiveness of response strategies for vulnerabilities to corruption in the Chinese public construction sector.Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(3), 683–705.
48.
ShenL., JiangS., & YuanH. (2012). Critical indicators for assessing the contribution of infrastructure projects to coordinated urban–rural development in China.Habitat International, 36(2), 237–246.
49.
SigleyG. (2006). Chinese governmentalities: Government, governance and the socialist market economy.Economy and Society, 35(4), 487–508.
50.
ToivonenA., & ToivonenP. U. (2014). The transformative effect of top management governance choices on project team identity and relationship with the organization: An agency and stewardship approach.International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1358–1370.
51.
TurnerJ. R., & SimisterS. J. (2001). Project contract management and a theory of organization.International Journal of Project Management, 19(8), 457–464.
52.
WarsameA. (2009). Organizational modes in the residential building sector in Sweden.Construction Management and Economics, 27(2), 153–163.
53.
WilliamsT., KlakeggO. J., MagnussenO. M., & GlasspoolH. (2010). An investigation of governance frameworks for public projects in Norway and the UK.International Journal of Project Management, 28(1), 40–50.
54.
WinchG. M. (2001). Governing the project process: A conceptual framework.Construction Management & Economics, 19(8), 799–808.
55.
WinchG. M. (2006). The governance of project coalitions: Towards a research agenda. In LoweD., & LeiringerR. (Eds.), Commercial management of projects: Defining the discipline (pp. 323–324). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing.
56.
WinchG. M. (2007). Managing project stakeholders. In MorrisP. W. G., & PintoJ. K. (Eds.), The Wiley guide to project, program, and portfolio management (pp. 271–289). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
57.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
58.
ZhangS., GaoY., FengZ., & SunW. (2015). PPP application in infrastructure development in China: Institutional analysis and implications.International Journal of Project Management, 33(3), 497–509.
59.
ZouW. W., KumaraswamyM., ChungJ., & WongJ. (2014). Identifying the critical success factors for relationship management in PPP projects.International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 265–274.
