This paper examines how project management activities vary in the corporate subsidiary of a multinational enterprise. The results of this case study indicate a pattern of direct, more simplistic activities in European operations, while a more complex pattern of project management activities operates in the North American subsidiary. Implications for this firm's efforts to transfer processes between divisions and to become “one global company” are discussed along with directions for future research.
AdamsJ. R., & BarndtS. E. (1983). Behavioral implications of the project lifecycle. In ClelandD. I., & KingW. R. (Eds.), Project Management Handbook(pp. 222–244). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
2.
Al-GahmdiS. (1998). Obstacles to successful implementation of strategic decision: The British experience. European Business Review, 98(6), 322–327.
3.
ArchibaldR. D. (1987). Implementing business strategies through projects. In KingW. R., & ClelandD. I. (Eds.), Strategic Planning and Management Handbook(pp. 499–507). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
4.
AshkenasR., UlrichD., JickT., & HerrS. (2002). The boundaryless organization: Breaking the chains of organizational structure.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
5.
BadaraccoJ. L. (1991). The knowledge link: How firms compete through strategic alliances.Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
6.
BeckD. R. (1983). Implementing top management plans through project management. In ClelandD. I., & KingW. R. (Eds.), Project Management Handbook (pp. 166–184). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
7.
BlessingD., GoerkM., & BachV. (2001). Management of customer and project knowledge: Solutions and experience at SAP. Knowledge and Process Management, 8(2), 75–90.
8.
ChengE., LiH., LoveP., & IraniZ. (2001). Network communication in the construction industry. Corporate Communications, 6(2), 61–70.
9.
ClelandD. I., & KingW. R. (1983). Project management handbook (3rd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
10.
DistererG. (2002). Management of project knowledge and experiences. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(5), 512–520.
11.
DrummondH., & HodgsonJ. (2003). The chimpanzees' tea party: A new metaphor for project managers. Journal of Information Technology, 28(September), 151–158.
12.
FordR. C., & RandolphW. A. (1992). Cross-functional structures: A review and integration of matrix organization and project management. Journal of Management, 18(2), 267–294.
13.
FortuneJ., & WhiteD. (2006). Framing of project critical success factors by a systems model. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 53–65.
14.
GoodwinJ., & ElliottC. (1995). Exporting strategies: Developing a strategic framework. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 60(1), Winter, 21–28.
15.
GormanM. E. (2002). Types of knowledge and their roles in technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(3), 219–231.
16.
GuttmanH., & LongmanA. (2006). Project teams: How good are they?Quality Progress, 39(2), 59–65.
17.
HirschhornL., & GilmoreT. (1992). The new boundaries of the “boundaryless” company. Harvard Business Review, May-June, 104–115.
18.
JugdevK., & MüllerR. (2005). A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success. Project Management Journal, 36(4) 19–31.
19.
JudgevK., & ThomasJ. (2002). Project management maturity models: The silver bullets of competitive advantage?Project Management Journal, 33(4), 4–14.
20.
KanterR. (1995). World-class: Thriving locally in the global economy.New York: Simon & Schuster.
21.
KanterJ., & WalshJ. (2004). Toward more successful project management. Information Systems Management, 21(2), 16–21.
22.
KraemerH.C., & ThiemannS. (1987). How many subjects?Statistical Power Analysis in Research.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
23.
PintoJ. (2002). Project management 2002. Research Technology Management, 45(2), 22–37.
24.
PintoJ., & PrescottJ. (1990). Planning and tactical factors in project implementation success. The Journal of Management Studies, 27(3), 305–328.
25.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2004). A guide to the project management body of knowledge, 3rdedition, Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, Inc.
26.
RadP. (2002). A model to quantify the success of projects. AACE International Transactions, CS05.1–05.4.
27.
SandelandsE. (1994). All talk and no action? Perish the thought. Management Decision, 32(5), 10–11.
28.
SiegelS. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences.Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Ltd.
29.
SkokW., & LeggeM. (2002). Evaluating enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems using an interpretive approach. Knowledge and Process Management, 9(2), 72–82.
30.
SniderK., & NissenM. (2003). Beyond the body of knowledge: A knowledge-flow approach to project management theory and practice. Project Management Journal, 34(2), 4–12.
31.
SlevinD., & PintoJ. (1987). Balancing strategy and tactics in project implementation. Sloan Management Review, 29(1), 33–41.
32.
SmithM. (2003). Business process design: Correlates of success and failure. The Quality Management Journal, 10(2), 38–49.
33.
TaylorS., & MorrisP. (2005). Implementing best practices for the 21st century. AACE International Transactions, PM18.1–18.5.
34.
TurnerJ. (1999). The handbook of project-based management: Improving the processes for achieving strategic objectives (2nd ed., vol. 1). London: McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
35.
UrliB., & UrliD. (2000). Project management in North America: Stability of the concepts. Project Management Journal, 31(3), 33–43.
36.
WeiserM., & MorrisonJ. (1998). Project memory: Information management for project teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 149–166.
37.
WesselJ. (1993). The strategic human resource management process in practice. Planning Review, 21(5), 37–38.
