Understanding and effecting change in project-based forms of organization is made difficult by the dispersed nature of management practices in such organizations and their effects upon the reinforcement of localized practices and routines that militate against the spread oforganization-wide change initiatives. Taking a perspective that is informed by the “situated” approach to knowledge and learning (Lave & Wenger, 1991), this paper focuses upon the role of organizational routines (Becker, 2004) in constraining or enabling the spread of new management practices within the firm. Drawing upon four case studies of change within UK construction firms, the paper examines the relationship between new and existing management practices and routines, focusing upon the effects of agency and managerial power and influence. Two key dimensions are revealed that influence the nature and extent of change: the extent to which new management initiatives interfere with existing project management practices; and the extent to which they disrupt the balance of power/knowledge within the organization. Implications for understanding and managing change in project-based organ-ization are drawn out and assessed.
BeckerM. C. (2004). Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 643–677.
2.
BlacklerF. (1993). Knowledge and the theory of organizations: Organizations as activity systems and the reframing of management. Journal of Management Studies, 30(6), 863–884.
3.
BlacklerF. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(6), 1021–1046.
4.
BradyT., & DaviesA. (2004). Building project capabilities: From exploratory to exploitative learning. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1601–1621.
5.
BresnenM. (1990). Organizing construction: Project organization and matrix management.London: Routledge.
6.
BresnenM., GoussevskaiaA., & SwanJ. (2004). Embedding new management knowledge in project-based organizations. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1535–1555.
7.
BresnenM., & MarshallN. (2000). Building partnerships: case studies of client-contractor collaboration in the UK construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 18(7), 819–832.
8.
BresnenM., & MarshallN. (2001). Understanding the diffusion and application of new management ideas in construction. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 8(6), 335–345.
9.
BrownJ. S., & DuguidP. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.
10.
BrownJ. S., & DuguidP. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198–213.
11.
BrownJ. S., & EisenhardtK. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 1–34.
12.
ChernsA. B., & BryantD. T. (1984). Studying the client's role in construction management. Construction Management and Economics, 2, 177–184.
13.
ClarkP., & StauntonN. (1989). Innovation in technology and organization.London: Routledge.
14.
CohenW. M., & BacdayanP. (1994). Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organization Science, 5(4), 554–568.
15.
CohenM., BurkhartG., DosiM., EgichiM., MarengoL., WargilenM., & WinterS. (1996). Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(3), 653–698.
16.
CohendetP., & LlerenaP. (2003). Routines and incentives: the role of communities in the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 771–797.
17.
ContuA., & WillmottH. (2003). Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory. Organization Science, 14(3), 283–296.
18.
DeFillippiR. J. (2001). Project-based learning, reflective practices and learning outcomes. Management Learning, 32(1), 5–10.
19.
DeFillippiR. J., & ArthurM. B. (1998). Paradox in project-based enterprise: The case of film-making. California Management Review, 40(2), 125–139.
20.
DuboisA., & GaddeL-E. (2002). The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: Implications for productivity and innovation. Construction Management and Economics, 20(7), 621–631.
21.
EngwallM. (2003). No project is an island: Linking projects to history and context. Research Policy, 32, 789–808.
22.
FeldmanM. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611–629.
23.
FeldmanM. S. (2004). Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organization Science, 15(3), 295–309.
24.
FeldmanM. S., & PentlandB. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 94–118.
GannD. M. (2000). Building innovation: Complex constructs in a changing world.London: Thomas Telford.
27.
GiddensA. (1990). The consequences of modernity.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
28.
HannanM. T., & FreemanJ. R. (1983). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 29, 149–164.
29.
HansenM. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82–111.
30.
HansenM. T. (2002). Knowledge networks: explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13(3), 232–248.
31.
HedbergB. (1981). How organizations learn and unlearn. In NystromP., and StarbuckW. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32.
HobdayM. (2000). The project-based organization: An ideal for managing complex products and systems?Research Policy, 29, 871–893.
33.
HuberG. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115.
34.
LaveJ., & WengerE. (1991). Situated learning.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
LevinthalD. A., & MarchJ. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95–112.
36.
LevittB., & MarchJ. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.
37.
LindkvistL. (2004). Governing project-based firms: Promoting market-like processes within hierarchies. Journal of Management and Governance, 8, 3–25.
38.
LindkvistL., SoderlundJ., & TellF. (1998). Managing product development projects: On the significance of foun-tains and deadlines. Organization Studies, 19(6), 931–951.
39.
LukesS. (1974). Power: A radical view.London: Macmillan.
40.
MarchJ. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
41.
MarchJ. G., SchultzM., & ZhouX. (2000). The dynamics of rules.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
42.
MinerA. S. (1990). Structural evolution through idiosyncratic jobs: The potential for unplanned learning. Organization Science, 1, 195–210.
43.
NelsonR. R., & WinterS. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change.Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
44.
O'DellC., & GraysonJ. (1998). If only we knew what we know: Identification and transfer of international best practices. California Management Review, 40(3), 154–174.
45.
OrlikowskiW. (1996). Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 63–92.
46.
OrlikowskiW. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.
47.
OrrJ. E. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job.Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
48.
PentlandB. T., & ReuterH. (1994). Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 484–510.
49.
PettigrewA. M., & WhippR. (1991). Managing change for competitive success.Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
50.
PrencipeA., & TellF. (2001). Inter-project learning: Processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project based firms. Research Policy, 30, 1373–1394.
51.
SapsedJ., & SalterA. (2004). Postcards from the edge: Local communities, global programmes and boundary objects. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1515–1534.
52.
ScarbroughH., SwanJ., LaurentS., BresnenM., EdelmanL., & NewellS. (2004). Project-based learning and the role of learning boundaries. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1579–1600.
53.
SwanJ., NewellS., ScarbroughH., & HislopD. (1999). Knowledge management and innovation: Networks and networking. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(4), 262–275.
54.
SzulanskiG. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue), 27–43.
TsoukasH. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 11–25.
57.
TsoukasH. (2002). Knowledge-based perspectives on organizations: Situated knowledge, novelty, and communities of practice. Management Learning, 33(4), 419–426.
