User involvement in the process of developing information systems has long been known to be a critical component of eventual success. This study examines the importance of building an acceptable foundation for the interactions between the stakeholders in the project's outcome. A model is developed and empirically tested via a survey that explains the relationship between the foundation, the amount of user-related risk, and the project performance. The partnering activities used to build the foundation prove to be significant in the eventual process and should be considered as part of each development project.
AndersonJ.C., & GerbingD.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
3.
BarkiH., & HartwickJ. (1989). Rethinking the concept of user involvement. MIS Quarterly, 13(1), 53–63.
4.
BarkiH., RivardS., & TalbotJ. (1993). Toward an assessment of software development risk. Journal of Management Information System, 10(2), 203–223.
5.
BentlerP.M., & BonettD.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.
6.
CampbellD.T., & FiskeD.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validity by the multitrait-multimethod maxtrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(1), 81–105.
DollW., & TorkzadehG. (1989). A discrepancy model of end-user computing involvement. Management Science, 30(10), 1151–1171.
9.
IvesB., & OlsonM.H. (1984). User involvement and MIS success: A review of research. Management Science, 30(5), 586–603.
10.
JiangJ., SobolM., & KleinG. (2000). Performance ratings and importance of performance measures for IS staff: The different perceptions of IS users and IS staff. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(4), 424–434.
11.
JiangJ., KleinG., & BallounJ. (1996). Ranking of system implementation success factors. Project Management Journal, 27(4), 50–55.
12.
KleinG., JiangJ., & BoydM. (1999). Building a case for consonance. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Business Information Systems.London: Springer-Verlag.
13.
LarsonE.W. (1997). Partnering on projects: A study of the relationship between partnering activities and project success. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(2), 188–195.
14.
LewisI., & NielsonB. (1999). Analyzing requirements and defining solution architecture.Alameda, CA: SYBEX, Inc.
15.
MacCallumR., RoznowskiM., & NecowitzL. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111(3), 490–504.
16.
MeredithJ.R., & MantelS.J. (1989). Project management: A managerial approach (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
17.
SaleemN. (1996). An empirical test of the contingency approach to user participation in information systems development. Journal of Management Systems, 13(1), 145–166.
18.
TaitP., & VesseyI. (1988). The effect of user involvement on system success: A contingency approach. MIS Quarterly, 12(1), 91–107.
19.
ThamhainH.J., & WilemanD.L. (1987). Building high performing engineering project teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 34(3), 130–137.
20.
VanceR.J., & ColellaA. (1990). Effects of two types of feedback on goal acceptance and personal goals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 68–76.
21.
VancouverJ.B., & SchmittN.W. (1991). An exploratory examination of person-organization fit: Organizational goal congruence. Personnel Psychology, 44(2), 333–352.
