This paper reviews four project life-cycle models presenting some interests in the management of technical projects. It is shown that each life-cycle model has some specificity that can explain a particular aspect of a project or of the duty of a project manager. Because the reality of a project is always complex, it cannot be embraced by a single model; therefore, several complementary models are required.
ClelandD.I., & KingW.R. (Eds.) (1988). Project management handbook (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
2.
CliftonD.S., & FyffeD.E. (1977). Project feasibility analysis: A guide to profitable new ventures.Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley.
3.
ChristofolH., AoussatA., & DuchampR. (1993). Construction d'un modèle fractal du processus de conception de la coloration d'un produit. ClaveranneJ.-P., LarrasquetJ.-M., & JayaratnaN. (Eds.) Projectique. A la recherche d'un sens perdu.Paris: Economica. pp. 336–345.
4.
de RosnayJ. (1993). Conférence de clôture. ClaveranneJ.-P., LarrasquetJ.-M., & JayaratnaN. (Eds.) Projectique. A la recherche d'un sens perdu.Paris: Economica. pp. 403–407.
5.
KelleyA.J. (1982). The new project environment. New dimensions of project management.Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
6.
KerznerH. (1994). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling and controlling (5th ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
7.
LacosteG. (1999). Risques et analyse des risques (Cours de DEA Systèmes Industriels).Écoles Doctorales Systèmes, ÉNSIGC. Toulouse, France.
8.
MeredithJ., & MantelS. (1995). Project management, a managerial approach (3rd ed.). Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley.
9.
MorrisP.W.G. (1988). Managing project interfaces: Key points for project success. In ClelandD., & KingW. (Eds.), Project Management Handbook (2nd ed.). (pp. 16–55). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
10.
PMI Standards Committee. (1996). A guide to the project management body of knowledge.Upper Darby, PA: Project Management Institute.
