The past ten years has been witness to a movement towards a less restrictive setting for educating students with disabilities. Although earlier court decisions were not always as supportive of inclusive settings, recent court decisions seem to indicate a movement towards supporting more integrated educational settings. The authors of this paper discuss the impact of a number of recent legal decisions regarding least restrictive educational settings and their implications for rural special education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BartlettL. D. (1992). Mainstreaming: On the road to clarification.Educational Law Quarterly, 1, 465–473.
2.
Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, 102 S. Ct. 3034. (1982).
3.
CapperCA., & LarkinJ. (1992). The regular education initiative: Educational reorganization for rural school districts.Journal of School Leadership, 2, 2232–245.
4.
ChalmersL. (1993). Successful inclusion in rural school settings: How one rural Minnesota school district made it work.Rural Educator, 14, 31–32.
5.
DanielR.R.V.State Board of Education, 874 F. 2d 1036 (5th Cir. 1989).
6.
FlitterA. (1994). Recent decisions: A progressive construction of the least restrictive environment requirement of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.Temple Law Review, 67(1), 371–391.
7.
GeorgeT., & EpsteinL. (1992). On the nature of Supreme Court decision making.American Political Science Review, 86, 323–336.
8.
GiangrecoM. F., DennisR., CloningerC., EdelmanS., & SchattmanR. (1993). I've counted Jon: Transformational experiences of teachers educating students with disabilities.Exceptional Children, 59, 359–372.
9.
GreerV.Rome City School District, 762 F. Supp. 936 (N.D. Ga. 1990), aff'd 950 F.2d 688 (11th Cir. 1991).
10.
HuefnerD. (1994). The mainstreaming cases: Tensions and trends for school administrators.Educational Administration Quarterly, 30, 27–55.
11.
JulnesR. (1994). The new Holland and other tests for resolving LRE disputes.Educational Law Reporter, 91, 789–809.
12.
MacKinnonJ. D., & BrownM. E. (1994). Inclusion in secondary schools: An analysis of school structure based on teacher's images of change.Educational Administration Quarterly, 30, 126–152.
13.
MalloryB., & BerkeleyT. (1988). The relationship between rural characteristics and the preparation of early childhood educators.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 7, 1–5.
14.
ObertiV.Board of Education of Borough of Clementon School District, 995 F.2d 1204 (3rd Cir. 1993).
15.
PassaroP. D., GuskeyT. R., & ZahnG. (1994). Using mastery learning to facilitate the full inclusion of students with the most intense educational needs within rural schools.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 13, 31–39.
16.
Roncker ex rel. Roncker v. Walter, 700 F. 2d 1058 (6th Cir. 1983).
17.
RuleS., StriefelS., MartinM., TaylorB., & DeerM. (1994). The Integrated Outreach Project: Final report.Logan, UT: Utah State University. (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED 378 754).
18.
Sacramento City Unified School District, Board of Education v.RachaelH., 14 F.3d 1398 (9th Cir. 1994).
19.
SebastianJ., & McDonnellJ. (1995). Rural students with low incidence disabilities: Recommended practices for the future.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 14, 31–38.
20.
SheehanR. (1991). Governmental litigants, underdogs, and civil liberties: A reassessment of a trend in Supreme Court decision making.The Western Political Science Quarterly, 45, 27–39.
21.
TemplemanT., FredericksH., & UdellT. (1989). Integration of children with moderate and severe handicaps into a day care center.Journal of Early Intervention, 13, 315–328.
22.
ThousandJ., & VillaR. (1989) Enhancing success in heterogenous schools. In StainbackS., StainbackW., & ForestM. (Eds.), Educating all students in the mainstream of regular education (pp. 89–103). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
23.
TurnbullH. RIII. (1993). Free appropriate public education: The law and children with disabilities.Denver, CO: Love.
24.
TurnbullA.P., TurnbullH.RIII, ShankM., & LealD. (1995). Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today's Schools.Columbus, OH: Merrill.
25.
WisniewskiL., & AlperS. (1994). Including students with severe disabilities in general education settings: Guidelines for change.Remedial and Special Education, 15 (1), 4–13.
26.
ZirkelP. A. (1993a). Special education law update III.Educational Law Reporter, 83, 543–551.
27.
ZirkelP. A. (1993b). A least restrictive environment checklist.The Special Educator, 9, 134–135.
