Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Researchers conducting studies related to special education contexts in rural schools must find ways to account for and consider unique and diverse cultural and contextual factors. In this article, we introduce mixed-methods social network analysis as one way to incorporate the structural and cultural aspects of rurality within a research design. We explain the basic tenets of social network analysis and mixed-methods social network analysis, including theoretical orientation, research focus, and analysis options. Then, we provide possible research topics that could be explored using a mixed-methods social network analysis approach. We conclude with an exemplar including data from rural special educator interviews and networks.

Keywords

mixed methods social network analysis rurality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albrecht

S. F.

Johns

B. H.

Mounsteven

Olorunda

(2009). Working conditions as risk or resiliency factors for teachers of students with emotional and behavioral disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 46(10), 1006–1022. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20440

Cancio

E. J.

Albrecht

S. F.

Johns

B. H.

(2013). Defining administrative support and its relationship to the attrition of teachers of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 36(4), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2013.0035

Carrington

P. J.

(2014). Social network research. In Domínguez

Hollstein

(Eds.), Mixed methods social networks research: Design and applications (Vol. 36, pp. 35–64). Cambridge University Press.

Carrington

P. J.

Scott

(2011). An introduction. In Carrington

P. J.

Scott

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 1–8). Sage.

Complex Data Collective. (2016). Network canvas: Interviewer [Computer software]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6026548

Daly

A. J.

Finnigan

K. S.

(2011). The ebb and flow of social network ties between district leaders under high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 39–79. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210368990

French

K. R.

Lee

C. D.

Zellner

(2023). Beliefs, perception, and change: A study of ego network influence on first-year teachers. Journal of Educational Change, 24(4), 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-023-09479-5

Froehlich

D. E.

Van Waes

Schäfer

(2020). Linking quantitative and qualitative network approaches: A review of mixed methods social network analysis in education research. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 244–268. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903311

Gehrke

R. S.

McCoy

(2007). Considering the context: Differences between the environments of beginning special educators who stay and those who leave. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 26(3), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687050702600305

10.

Goldenberg

Han

Lehmann

D. R.

Hong

J. W.

(2009). The role of hubs in the adoption process. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 1–13. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20619007

11.

Hargreaves

Kvalsund

Galton

(2009). Reviews of research on rural schools and their communities in British and Nordic countries: Analytical perspectives and cultural meaning. International Journal of Educational Research, 48(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2009.02.001

12.

Hawley

L. R.

Koziol

N. A.

Bovaird

J. A.

McCormick

C. A.

Welch

G. W.

Arthur

A. M.

Bash

(2016). Defining and describing rural: Implications for rural special education research and policy. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 35(3), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051603500302

13.

Hite

J. M.

Williams

E. J.

Baugh

S. C.

(2005). Multiple networks of public school administrators: An analysis of network content and structure. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 8(2), 91–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360312042000329086

14.

Hollstein

(2014). Mixed methods social networks research: An introduction. In Domínguez

Hollstein

(Eds.), Mixed methods social networks research: Design and applications (Vol. 36, pp. 3–34). Cambridge University Press.

15.

Inouye

Macias

Boz

Lee

M. J.

Hammack

Iveland

Johansen

(2024). Defining rural: Rural teachers’ perspectives and experiences. Education Sciences, 14(6), 645. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060645

16.

Jennings

J. L.

(2010). School choice or schools’ choice? Managing in an era of accountability. Sociology of Education, 83(3), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040710375688

17.

Kaihoi

C. A.

Bottiani

J. H.

Bradshaw

C. P.

(2022). Teachers supporting teachers: A social network perspective on collegial stress support and emotional wellbeing among elementary and middle school educators. School Mental Health: A Multidisciplinary Research and Practice Journal, 14(4), 1070–1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-022-09529-y

18.

Karnopp

(2020). Ties that bind: Knowledge movement and tie formation in a regional principals’ learning network. Voices of Reform, 3(1), 56–77. https://doi.org/10.32623/3.00005

19.

Leko

M. M.

Hitchcock

J. H.

Love

H. R.

Houchins

D. E.

Conroy

M. A.

(2023). Quality indicators for mixed-methods research in special education. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221141031

20.

Liou

Y.-H.

Daly

A. J.

(2018). Broken bridges: A social network perspective on urban high school leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(5), 562–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-01-2018-0010

21.

López Solé

Civís Zaragoza

Molina González

J. L

. (2018). La influencia del capital social en el desarrollo profesional de maestros noveles: Una aproximación con métodos mixtos desde el análisis de Redes Sociales [The influence of social capital on the development of novice teachers: A mixed method approach using social network analysis]. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 22(2), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v22i2.7717

22.

Marin

Wellman

(2011). Social network analysis: An introduction. In Carrington

P. J.

Scott

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 11–25). Sage.

23.

Maslach

Schaufeli

W. B.

Leiter

M. P.

(2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397

24.

Matsumura

L. C.

Garnier

H. E.

Resnick

L. B.

(2010). Implementing literacy coaching: The role of school social resources. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(2), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373710363743

25.

McCarty

Lubbers

M. J.

Vacca

Molina

J. L.

(2019). Conducting personal network research: A practical guide. Guilford Publications.

26.

McFarland-Whisman

Whisman

Lockwood

(2023). A preliminary look at reasons for attrition among special educators teaching students with autism spectrum disorder. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 42(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705221136115

27.

Minghui

Lei

Xiaomeng

Potměšilc

(2018). Teacher efficacy, work engagement, and social support among Chinese special education school teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 648. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00648

28.

Monge

P. R.

Contractor

N. S.

(2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford University Press.

29.

Park

E.-Y.

Shin

(2020). A meta-analysis of special education teachers’ burnout. SAGE Open, 10(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020918297

30.

Perry

B. L.

Pescosolido

B. A.

Borgatti

S. P.

(2018). Egocentric network analysis: Foundations, methods, and models (Vol. 44). Cambridge University Press.

31.

Pinquart

Duberstein

P. R.

(2010). Associations of social networks with cancer mortality: A meta-analysis. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 75(2), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.06.003

32.

Rude

Miller

K. J.

(2018). Policy challenges and opportunities for rural special education. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870517748662

33.

Showalter

Hartman

S. L.

Eppley

Johnson

Klein

(2023). Why rural matters 2023: Centering equity and opportunity. National Rural Education Association. https://www.nrea.net/why-rural-matters

34.

Sindelar

P. T.

Pua

D. J.

Fisher

Peyton

D. J.

Brownell

M. T.

Mason-Williams

(2018). The demand for special education teachers in rural schools revisited: An update on progress. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870517749247

35.

Song

Son

Lin

(2011). Social support. In Scott

Carrington

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (Vol. 9, pp. 116–128). Sage.

36.

Spillane

J. P.

Shirrell

Sweet

T. M.

(2017). The elephant in the schoolhouse: The role of propinquity in school staff interactions about teaching. Sociology of Education, 90(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040717696151

37.

Sutter

Demshak

Sundeen

(2025). Definitional issues of rural settings in special education research. Rural Special Education Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705251323255

38.

Sweet

T. M.

Thomas

A. C.

Junker

B. W.

(2013). Hierarchical network models for education research: Hierarchical latent space models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38(3), 295–318. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998612458702

39.

Thomas

Tuytens

Moolenaar

Devos

Kelchtermans

Vanderlinde

(2019). Teachers’ first year in the profession: The power of high-quality support. Teachers and Teaching, 25(2), 160–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1562440

40.

Toraman

Plano Clark

V. L.

(2020). Reflections about intersecting mixed methods research with social network analysis. In Froehlich

D. E.

Rehm

Rienties

B. C.

(Eds.), Mixed methods social network analysis (pp. 175–188). Routledge.

41.

Törnberg

(2020). Minding the gap between culture and connectivity: Laying the foundations for a relational mixed methods social network analysis. In Froehlich

D. E.

Rehm

Rienties

B. C.

(Eds.), Mixed methods social network analysis (pp. 58–71). Routledge.

42.

Vacca

(2018). Multilevel models for personal networks: Methods and applications. Statistica Applicata–Italian Journal of Applied Statistics, 30(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.26398/IJAS.0030-003

43.

Vacca

Cañarte

Vitale

(2021). Beyond ethnic solidarity: The diversity and specialisation of social ties in a stigmatised migrant minority. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(13), 3113–3141. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2021.1903305

44.

Valente

T. W.

Dyal

S. R.

Chu

K.-H.

Wipfli

Fujimoto

(2015). Diffusion of innovations theory applied to global tobacco control treaty ratification. Social Science & Medicine, 145, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.001

45.

Valente

T. W.

Ritt-Olson

Stacy

Unger

J. B.

Okamoto

Sussman

(2007). Peer acceleration: Effects of a social network tailored substance abuse prevention program among high-risk adolescents. Addiction, 102(11), 1804–1815. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01992.x

46.

Valente

T. W.

Vega Yon

G. G.

(2020). Diffusion/contagion processes on social networks. Health Education & Behavior, 47(2), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120901497

47.

van den Boom-Muilenburg

S. N.

Poortman

C. L.

Daly

A. J.

Schildkamp

de Vries

Rodway

van Veen

. (2022). Key actors leading knowledge brokerage for sustainable school improvement with PLCs: Who brokers what? Teaching and Teacher Education, 110, 103577. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2021.103577

48.

van Dijk

Bundock

. (2024). Social support for rural special educators [Manuscript in preparation]. Utah State University.

49.

van Dijk

Longhurst

Odunuga

E. O.

Bundock

. (2024). Supported at the core: Support networks of district based instructional coaches in special education. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/m4cuj

50.

Woodland

R. H.

Mazur

(2019). Of teams and ties: Examining the relationship between formal and informal instructional support networks. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(1), 42–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18785868

51.

T.-J.

Wang

L.-Y.

Gao

J.-Y.

Wei

A.-P.

(2020). Social support and well-being of Chinese special education teachers—An emotional labor perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), Article 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186884

52.

Wyngaerden

Vacca

Dubois

Lorant

(2022). The structure of social support: A multilevel analysis of the personal networks of people with severe mental disorders. BMC Psychiatry, 22(1), Article 698. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04278-3

Providing Outsider and Insider Perspectives Using Mixed-Methods Social Network Analyses

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References