Inclusive education offers accessibility to school settings for all children, regardless of background or disability. This retrospective mixed-methods study examined the attitudes of teacher candidates regarding inclusive education, after participating in a unique year-long program on this topic. The study included 42 teacher candidates and 38 mentor teachers from two elementary schools in southern Israel. The study also examined whether candidates would recommend the program, and the program’s impact regarding the teacher candidates and their mentors’ sense of self-efficacy. The findings show that 71% of candidates reported that the main advantage of the program was instilling values of acceptance and tolerance; 71% also stated that its main disadvantage was excessive workload. When examining recommendations for future implementation, 60% of the variance was predicted by “The inclusive education program has enhanced my ability to effectively manage a classroom in the future.” Finally, the mentors’ sense of self-efficacy was significantly higher than the candidates.
Ari-AmH.GumpelT. P. (2014). Special education today in Israel. In RotatoriA. F.BurkhardtS.ObiakorF. E.BakkenJ. P.SharmaU. (Eds.), Special education international perspectives: Practices across the globe (Vol. 28, pp. 473–504). Emerald Group.
2.
BanduraA. (1982). The assessment and predictive generality of self-percepts of efficacy. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 13(3), 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(82)90004-0
3.
BerryA. B.GravelleM. (2013). The benefits and challenges of special education positions in rural settings: Listening to the teachers. The Rural Educator, 34(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v34i2.400
4.
BillingsleyB.McLeskeyJ.CrockettJ. B. (2017). Principal leadership: Moving toward inclusive and high-achieving schools for students with disabilities. The Ceedar Center.
5.
BlassN. (2022). Special education budgeting in Israel: From the Dorner Committee Recommendations to implementation of Amendment 11 to the Special Education Law. Taub Center for Social Policy Studies in Israel.
6.
BraunsteinerM. L.Mariano-LapidusS. (2021). Using the Index for Inclusion to measure attitudes and perceptions of inclusion in teacher and school building leader candidates in the USA and Austria. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(13), 1443–1462. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1396503
7.
BrewerB. N.RiggsL. A.CourtadeG.LandrumT. J. (2022). Using caregiver support to promote efficacy of nontraditional instruction provided to students with extensive support needs. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 41(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705211049338
8.
Callado MorenoJ.Molina JaénM.Pérez NavíoE.Rodríguez MorenoJ. (2015). Inclusive education in schools in rural areas. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 4(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2015.4.120
9.
Central Bureau of Statistics (Hebrew). (2023). Central Bureau of Regional Statistics.
10.
CernaL.MezzanotteC.RutiglianoA.BrussinoO.SantiagoP.BorgonoviF.GuthrieC. (2021). Promoting inclusive education for diverse societies: A conceptual framework (OECD Education working papers, No. 260). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/94ab68c6-en
11.
Cochran-SmithM.LytleS. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press.
12.
CohenL.ManionL.MorrisonK. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
DignathC.Rimm-KaufmanS.van EwijkR.KunterM. (2022). Teachers’ beliefs about inclusive education and insights on what contributes to those beliefs: A meta-analytical study. Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 2609–2660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09695-0
15.
DowningJ. E.Peckham-HardinK. (2007). Supporting inclusive education for students with severe disabilities in rural areas. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 26(2), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687050702600203
16.
European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. (2012). Teacher education for inclusion: Profile of inclusive teachers.
European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. (2022). Profile for Inclusive Teacher Professional Learning: Including all education professionals in teacher professional learning for inclusion (A. De Vroey, A. Lecheval, & A. Watkins, Eds.).
20.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. (2023). Education and training monitor 2023: Comparative report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/936303
21.
Fernández-GómezE.Martín-SalvadorA.Luque-VaraT.Sánchez-OjedaM. A.Navarro-PradoS.Enrique-MirónC. (2020). Content validation through expert judgement of an instrument on the nutritional knowledge, beliefs, and habits of pregnant women. Nutrients, 12(4), 1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12041136
ForlinC.KeenM.BarrettE. (2008). The concerns of mainstream teachers: Coping with inclusivity in an Australian context. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 55(3), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10349120802268396
24.
ForlinC.SharmaU.LoremanT. (2014). Predictors of improved teaching efficacy following basic training for inclusion in Hong Kong. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18, 718–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2013.819941
25.
HainesS. J.GiangrecoM. F.ShepherdK. G.SuterJ. C.MooreM. (2022). Examination and redesign of inclusive special education service delivery in a rural school. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 41(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705211052497
26.
HawleyL. R.KoziolN. A.BovairdJ. A.McCormickC. M.WelchG. W.ArthurA. M.BashK. (2016). Defining and describing rural: Implications for rural special education research and policy. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 35(3), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051603500302
27.
HopkinsS. L.RoundP. N.BarleyK. D. (2018). Preparing beginning teachers for inclusion: Designing and assessing supplementary fieldwork experiences. Teachers and Teaching, 24(8), 915–930. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1495624
28.
IliasV.SpyrosK.DimitriadouI. (2021). The perceptions of primary education teachers about inclusive education in the Greek educational system. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(2), 12–31. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i2.3540
29.
JacobU. S.PillayJ. (2022). A comparative study of pre-service teachers’ knowledge and perceptions of, and attitudes toward, inclusive education. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1012797. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1012797
KimhiY.Bar NirA. (2024). Balancing special education knowledge and expertise in teacher training programs. Teaching Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2024.2327861
33.
KimhiY.SokolO.LavianR. H. (2022). Professional competence of teachers: Improving reading comprehension in classes for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Teaching and Teacher Education, 118, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103829
34.
LiuS. H. (2014). Excellent mentor teachers’ skills in mentoring for pre-service teachers. International Journal of Education, 6(3), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v6i3.5855
35.
López-AzuagaR.Suárez RiveiroJ. M. (2018). Perceptions of inclusive education in schools delivering teaching through learning communities and service-learning. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(1), 1019–1033. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1507049
36.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). Students with disabilities. Condition of education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cgg
37.
NesjeK.LejonbergE. (2022). Tools for the school-based mentoring of pre-service teachers: A scoping review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 111, 103609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103609
38.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2016). Education policy outlook: Israel. OECD.
39.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2023). Equity and inclusion in education: Finding strength through diversity. OECD.
40.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development/European Commission. (2020). Cities in the world: A new perspective on urbanization. OECD.
41.
RudeH. A.MillerK. J. (2018). Policy challenges and opportunities for rural special education. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870517748662
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2009). Defining an inclusive education agenda: Reflections around the 48th session of the International Conference on Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000186807
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2020). Personalized Learning within Teacher Education: A Framework and Guidelines. The INTERPEARL project partners. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374043
46.
WoodcockS.SharmaU.SubbanP.HitchesE. (2022). Teacher self-efficacy and inclusive education practices: Rethinking teachers’ engagement with inclusive practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 117, 103802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103802
47.
ZeichnerK. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347671
