Professionals and communication partners report experiencing challenges with regard to developing the knowledge and skills needed to support individuals with complex communication needs who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). These challenges can be exacerbated in rural and remote areas where access to resources and training may be limited. This practitioner-focused article provides evidence-based strategies for addressing the knowledge and skill needs experienced by professionals and communication partners in rural communities, including strategies for (a) identifying AAC knowledge and skill needs, (b) accessing AAC resources, (c) using principles of instructional design and instructional coaching to address identified areas of need, (d) considering contexts for instruction, and (e) examining contextual fit.
AlbinR.LucyshynJ.HornerR.FlanneryK. (1996). Contextual fit for behavioral support plans: A model for “goodness of fit.” In KeogelL.KoegelR.DunlapG. (Eds.), Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community (pp. 81–98). Paul H. Brookes.
3.
AndzikN. R.ChungY. C.Doneski-NicolJ.DollarhideC. T. (2017). AAC services in schools: A special educator’s perspective. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 65(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2017.1368909
4.
AshburnerJ.VickerstaffS.BeetgeJ.CopleyJ. (2016). Remote versus face-to-face delivery of early intervention programs for children with autism spectrum disorders: Perceptions of rural families and service providers. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 23, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2015.11.011
BallinL.BalandinS.StancliffeR. J. (2012). The speech-generating device (SGD) mentoring program: Training adults who use an SGD to mentor. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28(4), 254–265. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2012.708880
7.
BallinL.BalandinS.StancliffeR. J. (2013). The speech-generating device (SGD) mentoring program: Supporting the development of people learning to use an SGD. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 25(4), 437–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-012-9322-0
8.
BerryA.PetrinR.GravelleM.FarmerT. (2012). Issues in special education teacher recruitment, retention, and professional development: Considerations in supporting rural teachers. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 30(4), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051103000402
9.
BeukelmanD.LightJ. (2020). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (5th ed.). Paul H. Brookes.
10.
BingerC.BallL.DietzA.Kent-WalshJ.LaskerJ.LundS.McKelveyM.QuachW. (2012). Personnel roles in the AAC assessment process. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28(4), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2012.716079
11.
BingerC.Kent-WalshJ.BerensJ.Del CampoS.RiveraD. (2008). Teaching Latino parents to support the multi-symbol message productions of their children who require AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(4), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610802130978
12.
BingerC.Kent-WalshJ.EwingC.TaylorS. (2010). Teaching educational assistants to facilitate the multi-symbol message production of young students who require augmentative and alternative communication. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(2), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2009/09-0015
13.
CamdenC.PratteG.FallonF.CoutureM.BerbariJ.TousignantM. (2020). Diversity of practices in telerehabilitation for children with disabilities and effective intervention characteristics: Results from a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(24), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2020.1825032
14.
CameronA.McPhailS.HudsonK.FlemingJ.LethleanJ.Ju TanN.FinchE. (2018). The confidence and knowledge of health practitioners when interacting with people with aphasia in a hospital setting. Disability and Rehabilitation, 40(11), 1288–1293. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1294626
15.
ChungY.CarterE. W. (2013). Promoting peer interactions in inclusive classrooms for students who use speech-generating devices. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38(2), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.2511/027494813807714492
16.
DadaS.MurphyY.TönsingK. (2017). Augmentative and alternative communication practices: A descriptive study of the perceptions of South African speech-language therapists. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(4), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2017.1375979
17.
Da FonteM.BoeschM. (2018). Effective augmentative and alternative communication practices: A handbook for school-based practitioners. Routledge.
18.
Da FonteM.BoeschM.DeLucaE.PappS.MohlerA.HolmesE.ClouseK.YoungR.UrbanoR. (2022). Current preparation status in AAC: Perspectives of special education teachers in the United States. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 38(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2022.2046851
19.
DimianA. F.ElmquistM.ReichleJ.SimacekJ. (2018). Teaching communicative responses with a speech-generating device via telehealth coaching. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2, 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-018-0055-7
20.
DoddJ. (2017). Augmentative and alternative communication: An intensive, immersive, socially based service delivery model. Plural Publishing.
21.
GanzJ. B. (2014). Aided augmentative communication for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Springer.
22.
GanzJ. B.GoodwynF. D.BolesM. M.HongE. R.RispoliM. J.LundE. M.KiteE. (2013). Impacts of a PECS instructional coaching intervention on practitioners and children with autism. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(3), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.818058
23.
GanzJ. B.SimpsonR. (2019). Interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorder and complex communication needs. Paul H. Brookes.
24.
GosselinK. S.SundeenT. H. (2019). Supporting literacy instruction for students with extensive support needs in rural settings through collaboration: So much better when we work together!Rural Special Education Quarterly, 38(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870518795672
25.
HallN.Juengleng-SudkampJ.GutnammM. (2021). Fundamentals of AAC: A case-based approach to enhancing communication. Plural Publishing.
26.
HallN.Juengleng-SudkampJ.GutmannM.CohnE. (2020). Tele-AAC: Augmentative and alternative communication through telepractice. Plural Publishing.
27.
HanlineM. F.DennisL. R.WarrenA. W. (2018). The outcomes of professional development on AAC use in preschool classrooms: A qualitative investigation. Infants and Young Children, 31(3), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1097/iyc.0000000000000120
28.
HilgartM. M.RitterbandL. M.ThorndikeF. P.KinzieM. B. (2012). Using instructional design process to improve design and development of internet interventions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1890
29.
HoffmannA. N.BogoevB. K.SellersT. P. (2019). Using telehealth and expert coaching to support early childhood special education parent-implemented assessment and intervention procedures. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 38(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870519844162
30.
HornerR. H.SalentineS.AlbinR. W. (2003). Self-assessment of contextual fit in schools. The University of Oregon.
31.
JohnsonJ. W.McDonnellJ.HolzwarthV. N.HunterK. (2004). The efficacy of embedded instruction for students with developmental disabilities enrolled in general education classes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6(4), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007040060040301
32.
JohnstonS.BlueC. (2023). Knowledge and skill barriers: Exploring the evidence base. In JohnstonS.GevarterC.SennottS.McLeodL.SandersE. (Eds.), Supporting individuals who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Breaking down opportunity barriers (pp. 18–20). Plural Publishing.
33.
JohnstonS.GevarterC.SennottS.McLeodL.SandersE. (2023). Supporting individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Breaking down opportunity barriers. Plural Publishing.
34.
JohnstonS.ReichleJ.FeeleyJ.JonesE. (2012). AAC strategies for individuals with moderate to severe disabilities. Paul H. Brookes.
35.
KaranthP.Roseberry-McKibbinC.JamesP. (2017). Interventions for toddlers using augmentative and alternative communication: Practical strategies. Plural Publishing.
36.
Kent-WalshJ.BingerC.HashamZ. (2010). Effects of parent instruction on the symbolic communication of children using augmentative and alternative communication during storybook reading. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0014)
37.
Kent-WalshJ.McNaughtonD. (2005). Communication partner instruction in AAC: Present practices and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(3), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610400006646
38.
KlepschM.SeufertT. (2020). Understanding instructional design effects by differentiated measurement of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Instructional Science, 48(1), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09502-9
39.
KnutsenJ.WolfeA.BurkeB. L.HepburnS.LindgrenS.CouryD. (2016). A systematic review of telemedicine in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 3(4), 330–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-016-0086-9
40.
KraftM. A.BlazarD.HoganD. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
41.
LonckeF. (2021). Augmentative and alternative communication: Models and applications (2nd ed.). Plural Publishing.
42.
MandakK.LightJ.McNaughtonD. (2020). The effects of online training on preservice speech-language pathologists’ use of family-centered skills. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29(3), 1489–1504. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_ajslp-19-00057
43.
McCabeK. M.RupparA. L. (2023). Rural inclusive education for students with disabilities in the United States: A narrative review of research. Rural Educator, 44(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.55533/2643-9662.1361
44.
McCoyA.McNaughtonD. (2021). Effects of online training on educators’ knowledge and use of a system of least prompts to support augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Behavioral Education, 30(3), 319–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-020-09374-6
45.
McLaughlinT. W.DenneyM. K.SnyderP. A.WelshJ. L. (2012). Behavior support interventions implemented by families of young children: Examination of contextual fit. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300711411305
46.
McMillanJ. M.RenzagliaA. (2014). Supporting speech-generating device use in the classroom part 1: Teacher professional development. Journal of Special Education Technology, 29(3), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341402900303
47.
McNaughtonD.LightJ.BeukelmanD.KleinC.NiederD.NazarethG. (2019). Building capacity in AAC: A person-centered approach to supporting participation by people with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1556731
48.
MerrillM. D. (2013). First principles of instruction. Wiley.
49.
MildonR.WadeC.MatthewsJ. (2008). Considering the contextual fit of an intervention for families headed by parents with an intellectual disability: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 21(4), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2008.00451.x
50.
MonzalveM.HornerR. H. (2021). The impact of the contextual fit enhancement protocol on behavior support plan fidelity and student behavior. Behavioral Disorders, 46(4), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742920953497
51.
MuttiahN.DragerK. D. R.McNaughtonD.PereraN. (2018). Evaluating AAC training for special education teachers in Sri Lanka, a low- and middle-income country. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(4), 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1512651
52.
NorburnK.MorganS.LevinA.HardingC. (2016). A survey of augmentative and alternative communication used in an inner-city special school. British Journal of Special Education, 43(3), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12142
53.
O’NeillT.WilkinsonK. M. (2020). Preliminary investigation of the perspectives of parents of children with cerebral palsy on the supports, challenges, and realities of integrating augmentative and alternative communication into everyday life. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29(1), 238–254. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_ajslp-19-00103
54.
OgletreeB. (2021). Augmentative and alternative communication: Challenges and solutions. Plural Publishing.
55.
PenningtonR.HornC.BerrongA. (2009). An evaluation of the differences between big city and small town special education services for students with low incidence disabilities in Kentucky. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28(4), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687050902800402
56.
Rosa-LugoL. I.Kent-WalshJ. (2008). Effects of parent instruction on communicative turns of Latino children using augmentative and alternative communication during storybook reading. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 30(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740108320353
57.
SandersE. J.PageT. A.LesherD. (2021). School-based speech-language pathologists: Confidence in augmentative and alternative communication. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 52(2), 512–528. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_lshss-20-00067
58.
SennottS. C.MasonL. H. (2016). AAC modeling with the iPad during shared storybook reading pilot study. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 37(4), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740115601643
59.
SinghS. J.HusseinN. H.KamalR. M.HassanF. H. (2017). Reflections of Malaysian parents of children with developmental disabilities on their experiences with AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2017.1309457
60.
SotoG.MullerE.HuntP.GoetzL. (2001). Professional skills for serving students who use AAC in general education classrooms: A team perspective. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 32(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2001/005)
61.
StroscheinR.ChappleD.McNaughtonD.LightJ.LaubscherE.CherryM. (2022). Evaluation of training of preservice professionals to support patient-provider communication for individuals who use AAC [Poster Presentation, Virtual]. Annual Conference of the American Speech and Hearing Association.
WermerL.BrockM. E.SeamanR. L. (2018). Efficacy of a teacher training a paraprofessional to promote communication for a student with autism and complex communication needs. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33(4), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357617736052
64.
WilkinsonK.FinestackL. (2021). Multimodal AAC for individuals with Down Syndrome. Paul H. Brookes.
