Given the linguistic and cognitive demands of communication, adult Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) users with acquired communication disorders may have difficulty using AAC systems consistently and effectively in “real-life” situations. The process of recommending AAC systems and strategies is an area of exploration, where clinicians need to treat each client as a unique individual. Speech-language pathologists are required to analyze speech, language, cognition, sensory, and motor skills of the client when attempting to choose appropriate AAC systems. Various challenges during the AAC implementation process may range from funding sources, time commitment, training, and device acquisition to effective use of the device in day-to-day situations. The AAC management strategies are discussed in light of functional and multimodal communications. Also, the perspectives of AAC user regarding environment, communication partners, social communication status, and quality of life are addressed, along with a brief case report highlighting challenges and successes with AAC systems.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005). Roles and responsibilities of Speech-Language Pathologists with respect to augmentative and alternative communication: Position statement. Retrieved from http://asha.org/docs/html/PS2005-00113.html
2.
BallL. J.AndersonE.BilyeauD. V.PatteeG. L.BeukelmanD. R.RobertsonJ. (2007). Duration of AAC technology use by persons with ALS. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 371–381.
3.
BallL. J.BeukelmanD.PatteeG. (2004). Augmentative and alternative communication acceptance by persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 113–123.
4.
BeukelmanD. R.FagerS.BallL.DietzA. (2007). AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: A Review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 230–242.
5.
BeukelmanD. R.MirendaP. (2005). Augmentative and alternative communication for children and adults (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
6.
BlackstoneS.Hunt BergM. (2003). Social networks: A communication inventory for individuals with complex communication needs and their communication partners-Manual. Monterey, CA: Augmentative Communication.
7.
BourgeoisM.CampC.RoseM.WhiteB.MaloneM.CarrJ.RovineM. (2003). A comparison of training strategies to enhance use of external aids by persons with dementia. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 361–378.
8.
BourgeoisM.DijkstraK.BurgioL.Allen-BurgeR. (2001). Memory aids as an augmentative and alternative communication strategy for nursing home residents with dementia. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 196–209.
9.
BrownleeA.BrueningL. M. (2012). Methods of communication at end of life for the person with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Topics in Language Disorders, 32, 168–185.
10.
BrownleeA.PalovcakM. (2007). The role of augmentative communication devices in the medical management of ALS. NeuroRehabilitation, 22, 445–450.
11.
CollierB.BlackstoneS. W.TaylorA. (2012). Communication access to business and organizations for people with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 205–218.
12.
CooperK.ShortT.StadlerM. (November 2009). Impact of aided AAC on conversation of adults with dementia. Poster presented at American Speech-Language-Hearing Convention, New Orleans, LA.
13.
DoyleM.PhillipsB. (2001). Trends in alternative and augmentative communication use by individuals with ALS. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 167–178.
GarrettK. L.LaskerJ. P. (2007). AAC and severe aphasia: Enhancing communication across the continuum of recovery. Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, 17, 6–15.
16.
HosK.WeissS.GarrettK.LloydL. (2005). The effect of remnant and pictographic books on the communicative interaction of individuals with global aphasia. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 218–232.
17.
Kent-WalshJ.BingerC. (2012). Partner instruction in AAC: Strategies for building circles of support. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 124–126.
18.
LaskerJ. P.BedrosianJ. L. (2001). Promoting acceptance of augmentative and alternative communication by adults with acquired communication disorders. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 141–153.
19.
LustigA. P.TompkinsC. A. (2002). A written communication strategy for a speaker with aphasia and apraxia of speech: Treatment outcomes and social validity. Aphasiology, 16, 507–521.
20.
McKelveyM.EvansD. L.KawaiN.BeukelmanD. (2012). Communication styles of persons with ALS as recounted by surviving partners. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 232–242.
21.
McNaughtonD.LightJ. (2013). The iPad and mobile technology revolution: Benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 107–116.
22.
RichterM.BallL.BeukelmanD. R.LaskerJ.UllmanC. (2003). Attitudes toward communication modes and message formulation techniques used for storytelling by people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 170–186.
23.
ShaddenB. B.HagstromF.KoskiP. (2009). Neurogenic communication disorders: Life stories and the narrating self. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
24.
SohlbergM. M.KennedyM.AveryJ. M.CoelhoC.TurkstraL. M.YlvisakerM.YorkstonK. (2007). Practice guidelines for external aids for memory rehabilitation. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 15(1), xv–li.
