SPLASH is a 3-year professional development program designed to work with classroom teachers of students with moderate and severe disabilities. The program targets new teachers and employs methods aimed at supporting rural classrooms. The training content focuses on evidence-based practices in English language arts, mathematics, and science, as well as support for overall classroom practices that allow for academic rigor. Each teacher is paired with a coach for the duration of the 3-year participation and, in addition, receives observation support from university personnel with bug-in-the-ear intervention and ongoing support through virtual professional learning communities. Coaches also receive training and ongoing support throughout the program. This article describes the design, application, and outcomes of the SPLASH program. Implications and considerations for future directions are discussed.
AbellM.CollinsB. C.KleinertH.PenningtonR. (2014). Providing support for rural teachers of students with low incidence disabilities who are completing the Kentucky teacher internship program. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 33(3), 14–18.
2.
AndrewsA.BrownJ. L. (2015). Discrepancies in the ideal perceptions and the current experiences of special education teachers. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(6), 126–131.
3.
BrodyC. M.DavidsonN. (1998). Professional development for cooperative learning: Issues and approaches. Albany: State University of New York Press.
4.
BrowderD. M.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.SpoonerF.MimsP. J.BakerJ. N. (2009). Using time delay to teach literacy to students with severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 343–364.
BrowderD. M.MimsP. J.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.LeeA. (2009). Teaching elementary students with multiple disabilities to participate in shared stories. Research and Practice in Severe Disabilities, 34, 3–12.
7.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.WakemanS. Y.HarrisA. (2008). A meta-analysis on teaching mathematics to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74, 407–432.
8.
BrowderD. M.TrelaK.JimenezB. (2007). Training teachers to follow a task analysis to engage middle school students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities in grade-appropriate literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 206–219.
9.
BrowderD. M.WakemanS. Y.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.AlgozzineB. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392–408.
10.
CaineG.CaineR. (2010). Strengthening and enriching your professional learning community: The art of learning together. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
11.
CollinsB. C. (2007). Issues in rural special education that affect students with severe disabilities. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 26(2), 3–9.
12.
CourtadeG.JimenezB.DelanoM. (2014). Providing effective instruction in core content areas (literacy, mathematics, science, and social studies) in inclusive schools. In McLeskeyJ.WaldronN.SpoonerF.AlgozzineB. (Eds.), Handbook of effective inclusive schools: Research and practice (pp. 352–362). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
CourtadeG.JimenezB.TrelaK.BrowderD. (2008). Teaching to standards: Science. Verona, WI: Attainment Company.
14.
CourtadeG. R.SpoonerF.BrowderD. M. (2007). Review of studies with students with significant cognitive disabilities which link to science standards. Research and Practice for Persons With Disabilities, 32, 43–49.
15.
CourtadeG. R.TestD. W.CookB. G. (2015). Evidence-based practices for learners with severe intellectual disability. Research and Practice for Persons With Disabilities, 39, 305–318.
16.
DuFourR.EakerR.ManyT. (2010). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
17.
DunstC. J.TrivetteC. M. (2009). Let’s be PALS: An evidence-based approach to professional development. Infants and Young Children, 22, 163–175. Retrieved from https://depts.washington.edu/isei/iyc/22.3_Dunst.pdf
18.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95 § 114 Stat. 1177 (2015-2016).
FixsenD. L.NaoomS. F.BlaseK. A.FriedmanR. M.WallaceF. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature (FMHI Publication No. 231). Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, National Implementation Research Network.
21.
HallM. (2015). Transition module: Transitioning students with moderate and severe disabilities from high school to post school life [PowerPoint slides]. Lexington: University of Kentucky.
22.
HillP. (2015). States should do more for rural education. In GrossB.JochimA. (Eds.), Uncovering the productivity promise of rural education (Vol. 4, pp. 4–13). San Antonio, TX: Building State Capacity and Productivity Center.
23.
HudsonM. E.TestD. W. (2011). Evaluating the evidence base of shared story reading to promote literacy for students with extensive support needs. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 36, 34–45.
24.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U. S. C. § 1401 et seq. (reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990).
25.
JimenezB.KnightV.BrowderD. M. (2011). Early science. Verona, WI: Attainment Company.
KearnsJ.KleinertJ.PageJ.LandL. (2015). Teaching academic age-appropriate learning via communication [PowerPoint slides]. Lexington: University of Kentucky.
28.
KnightJ. (2007). Instructional coaching: A partnership approach to improving instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
29.
KnightV.BrowderD.AgnelloB.LeeA. (2010). Academic instruction for students with severe disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 42, 1–14.
30.
MimsP. (2011). Prompting systems (Modules Addressing Special Education and Teacher Education [MAST]). Greenville, NC: East Carolina University. Available from. http://mast.ecu.edu/modules/ps
31.
MimsP.LeeA.ZakasT.BrowderD. (2013). Teaching to standards: English language arts. Verona, WI: Attainment Company.
32.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115, § 1425, 20 U.S.C. §§ 6301 et seq. (2002).
33.
PenningtonR. C. (2017). An IEP for me: Program improvement for rural teachers of students with moderate to severe disability and autism spectrum disorder. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 36, 146–154.
34.
PenningtonR.CourtadeG. (2015). An examination of teacher and student behaviors in classrooms for students with moderate and severe intellectual disability. Preventing School Failure, 59, 40–47.
35.
PenningtonR.SzakacsW. (2014). Understanding behavior through functional behavior assessment: Online training module. Columbus: Ohio Center for Autism and Low Incidence (OCALI). Available from www.autisminternetmodules.org
PopeJ. (2015). SPLASH: LI-PGES update. Lexington, KY: Human Development Institute.
38.
RockM. L.SchoenfeldN.ZigmondN.GableR. A.GreggM.PloesslD. M.SalterA. (2013). Can you Skype me now? Developing teachers’ classroom management practices through virtual coaching. Beyond Behavior, 22(3), 15–23.
39.
ScheelerM. C.McAfeeJ. K.RuhlK. L.LeeD. L. (2006). Effects of corrective feedback delivered via wireless technology on preservice teacher performance and student behavior. Teacher Education and Special Education, 29, 12–25.
40.
ScheelerM. C.McKinnonK.StoutJ. (2012). Effects of immediate feedback delivered via webcam and bug-in-ear technology on preservice teacher performance. Teacher Education and Special Education, 35, 77–90.
41.
ScheelerM. C.RuhlK. L.McAfeeJ. K. (2004). Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 396–407.
42.
ShurrJ.HirthM.JasperA.McCollowM.HerouxJ. (2014). Another tool in the belt: Self-directed professional learning for teachers of students with moderate and severe disabilities. Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services, 33(1), 17–38.
43.
SimsR. L.PennyG. R. (2015). Examination of a failed professional learning community. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3, 39–45.
44.
SpoonerF.BrowderD. M.MimsP. (2011). Evidence-based practices. In BrowderD. M.SpoonerF. (Eds.), Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities (pp. 92–122). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
45.
SpoonerF.KnightV.BrowderD. M.JimenezB.DiBiaseW. (2011). Evaluating evidence-based practices in teaching science content to students with severe developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 36, 62–75.
46.
TrelaK.JimenezB.BrowderD. (2008). Teaching to standards: Math. Verona, WI: Attainment Company.
47.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Rural education in America. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ruraled/
48.
Van de WalleJ. A.KarpK. S.Bay-WilliamsJ. M. (2016). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
49.
WaldP. J.CastleberryM. S. (1999). Realigning our schools: Building professional learning communities. Washington, DC: George Washington University. (ERIC ED427478).
