Assistive Technology: Decision-making Practices in Public Schools

Abstract

The Amendments to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997 require schools to consider assistive technology for students receiving special education. In order to gain insight to the implementation of the mandates, we surveyed special education directors across the state of Texas regarding assistive technology decision-making and implementation procedures. Findings suggest that a team-approach was utilized for device selection. Furthermore, device user-friendliness and previous experience are two factors that influenced decision-making. Finally, results also indicated that school districts in rural areas reported having fewer assistive technology devices available to them in comparison to suburban and urban school districts.

Keywords

assistive technology assistive technology device assistive technology service assistive technology decision-making public school IDEA

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ault,

M. J.

, Bausch,

M. E.

, & McLauren,

E. M.

, (2013). Assistive technology service delivery in rural school districts. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 32(2), 15-22.

Barnard-Brak,

, & Lechtenberger,

(2010). Student IEP participation and academic achievement across time. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 343-349.

Bausch,

, & Ault,

M.J.

(2008). Assistive technology implementation plan: A tool for improving outcomes. Teaching Exceptional Children, 41 (1), 6-14.

Bausch,

, & Ault,

M.J.

(2012). Status of assistive technology instruction in university personnel preparation programs. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 8, 1-14.

Bausch,

M. E.

, Quinn,

B. S.

, Chung,

, Ault,

M. J.

, & Behrmann,

M. M.

(2009). Assistive technology in the individualized education plan: Analysis of policies across ten states. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 22, 9-23.

Brady,

R. B.

, Long,

T. N.

, Richards,

, & Vallin,

(2007). Assistive technology curriculum structure and content in professional preparation service provider training programs. Journal of Allied Health, 36, 183-192.

Center for Innovations in Special Education (2002). Parent's role in assistive technology considerations: Do you know information brochure. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED 309301).

Copley,

, & Ziviani,

(2004). Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 11, 229-243.

Copley,

, & Ziviani,

(2007). Use of a team-based approach to assistive technology assessment and planning for children with multiple disabilities: A Pilot Study. Assistive Technology, 19, 709-125.

10.

Edyburn,

D. L.

(2004). Rethinking assistive technology. Special Education Technology Practice, 5(4), 16-23.

11.

Georgia Project for Assistive Technology (n.d.). Assistive technology resource charts. Retrieved from: http://www.gpat.org/default.htm.

12.

Gitlow,

, & Sanford,

(2003). Assistive technology education needs of allied health professionals in a rural state. Journal of Allied Health, 32, 46-51.

13.

Gravetter,

F. J.

, & Wallnau,

L. B.

(2005). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences (5^th Ed.). New York: Thomson Wadsworth Publishing.

14.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.20 U. S. C. § 1400 et seq. (1997).

15.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act.20 U. S. C. § 1401 et seq. (2004).

16.

Iowa Program for Assistive Technology (n.d.). Assistive technology devices. Retrieved from http://www.uiowa.edu/infotech/ATDevice.htm.

17.

Jeffs,

, & Morrison,

(2005). Special education technology addressing diversity: A synthesis of the literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20, 19-25.

18.

Johnston,

, Beard,

L. A.

, & Carpenter,

L. B.

(2007). Assistive technology: Access for all students. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

19.

Judge,

, & Simms,

K. A.

(2009). Assistive technology training at the pre-service level: A national snapshot of teacher preparation programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32, 33-44.

20.

Jung,

L. A.

, & Bradley,

K. D.

(2006). Special education services in rural schools: A study of the kindergarten population using the ECLS-K. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 25(4), 25-30.

21.

Keramidas,

C. G.

, & Collins,

B. C.

(2009). Assistive technology use with the birth to three population: A rural perspective. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28(1), 38-48.

22.

King,

(1999). Assistive technology: Essential human factors. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

23.

Lahm,

E. A.

, & Nickels,

B. L.

(1999). Assistive technology competencies for special educators. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(1), 56-63.

24.

Marino,

M.T.

, Marino,

E.C.

, & Shaw,

S.F.

(2006). Making informed assistive technology decisions for students with high incidence disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(6), 18-25.

25.

Martin,

J. E.

, Marshall,

L. H.

, & Sale,

(2004). A 3-year study of middle, junior high, and high school IEP meetings. Exceptional Children, 70(3), 285–297.

26.

Mertler,

& Vannatta,

(2001).Advanced and multivariate statistical methods (2^nd edition). New York: Pyrczak Publishing.

27.

Michaels,

C.A.

, & McDermott,

(2003). Assistive technology integration in special education teacher preparation: Program coordinators' perceptions of current attainment and importance. Journal of Special Education Technology,18 (3), 29-44.

28.

National Assistive Technology Research Institute (2006). Gillette technology center: AAC device categories. Retrieved from http://natri.uky.edu/assoc_projects/qiat/documents/Aacdevic_.pdf

29.

National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation (n.d.). Abledata. Retrieved from http://www.abledata.com

30.

Nunnally,

J. C.

(1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

31.

Parette,

H. P.

, Peterson-Karlan,

G. R.

, Wojcik,

B. W.

, & Bardi,

(2007). Monitor that progress! Interpreting data trends for assistive technology decision making. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40, 22-29.

32.

Riemer-Reiss,

M. L.

, & Wacker,

R. R.

(2000). Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 66, 44–50.

33.

Rosenkoetter,

S. E.

, Irwin,

J. D.

, & Saceda,

R. G.

(2004). Addressing personnel needs for rural areas. Teacher Education and Special Education, 3, 276-291.

34.

Scherer,

M. J.

, & Craddock,

(2002). Matching person and technology(MPT) assessment process, Technology and Disability, 14, 125–131.

35.

Stodden,

R. A.

& Conway,

M. A.

(2002). Supporting youth with disabilities to access and succeed in postsecondary education: Essentials for educators in secondary schools. National Center on Secondary Education and Transition Newsletter, 1(5), 3–8.

36.

Texas Education Agency.(2010). District directory. Retrieved from http://mansfield.tea.state.tx.us/tea.askted.web/Forms/Home.aspx

37.

United States Department of Education. (2008). Fiscal year 2009 budget summary: Section II.B. special education and rehabilitative services. Retrieved May 29, 2010 from http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/budget09/summary/edlitesection2b.html.

38.

United States Department of Education (2011a). Number and percentage of children ages 6 through 21 served under IDEA, Part B, by educational environment and state: Fall 2011. Retrieved from https://www.ideadata.org/arc_toc13.asp#partbLRE

39.

United States Department of Education (2011b). Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS), OMB#1820-0043: Children with Disabilities Receiving Special Education Under Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 2011. Retrieved from https://www.ideadata.org/TABLES35TH/B1-1.pdf

40.

Watts,

E. H.

, O'Brien,

, & Wojcik,

B. W.

(2004). Four models of assistive technology consideration: How do they compare to recommended educational assessment practices? Journal of Special EducationTechnology, 19(1), 43-56.