Online coursework is common across the United States, and many institutes of higher education include it in their strategic plans (Allen & Seaman, 2011). Special education has embraced distance education technology—especially personnel preparation programs that are in rural areas and/or prepare teachers who will work in rural areas. Undergraduates are increasingly interested in online courses, but some question whether they have the skill sets to be successful in online coursework. This investigation compares two sections of the same undergraduate special education course (i.e., one section was taught in a traditional setting and the other received archived, asynchronous class sessions online) on attendance, grades on course assignments, quizzes, an exam, and final grade. Discussion of the implications includes findings and how they might relate to rural online programs. The findings showed that online students struggled with deadlines and time management skills more than students that attended classes in traditional settings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen,I. E. & Seaman,J. (2004). Entering the mainstream: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2003 and 2004. Sloan Center for Online Education, MA. Retrieved from http://www.sloanc.org
Artino,A. R., & Stephens,J. M. (2009). Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online. Internet & Higher Education, 12(3/4), 146-151. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.02.001
Chen,L. & Iris,C. (2004, October). Interactive TV: An effective instructional mode for adult learners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of AECT.Chicago, IL.
6.
Collins,B. C. (1997). Training rural educators in Kentucky through distance learning: A model with follow-up data. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20, 234-248.
7.
Daymont,T., & Blau,G. (2011). Deciding between traditional and online formats: Exploring the role of learning advantages, flexibility, and compensatory adaptation. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 12(2), 156-175.
Fillion,G., Limayem,M., Laferrière,T., & Mantha,R. (2007). Integrating ICT into higher education: A study of onsite vs online students' perceptions. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 11(2), 45-72.
10.
Friedman,H., & Friedman,L. (2011). Crises in education: Online learning as a solution. Creative Education, 2(3), 156-163.
11.
Gould,T. (2003). Hybrid classes: Maximizing institutional resources and student learning. Proceedings of the 2003 ASCUE Conference, June 8-12, 2003, Myrtle Beach, SC. Retrieved from www.ascue.org
12.
Grisham-Brown,J., & Collins,B. C. (2002). Training rural educators in Kentucky through distance learning: Impact and follow-up data. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 21(4), 12-20.
13.
Holmberg-Wright,K., & Wright,D. J. (2012). MBA and undergraduate business student perceptions of online courses: Experienced online students versus students who have not taken an online course. Global Education Journal, 2012(1), 169-186.
14.
Lei,S. A., & Govra,R. K. (2010). College distance education courses: Evaluating benefits and costs from institutional, faculty and students' perspectives. Education, 130(4), 616-631.
15.
Ludlow,B. L., & Brannan,S. A. (1999). Distance education programs for preparing personnel for rural areas: Current practices, emerging trends, and future directions. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 18(3/4), 5-10.
16.
Ludlow,B. L., Conner,D., & Schechter,J. (2005). Low incidence disabilities and personnel preparation for rural areas: Current status and future trends Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24(3), 15-24.
17.
Macon,D. (2011, January). Student satisfaction with online courses versus traditional courses: A meta-analysis. ProQuest LLC.
18.
Palloff,R. M., & Pratt,K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Prensky,M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
21.
Puzziferro,M. (2008). Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 72-89.
Seaman,J. (2009). Online learning as a strategic asset. volume II: The paradox of faculty voices—views and experiences with online learning. results of a national faculty survey, part of the online education benchmarking study conducted by the APLU-Sloan National Commission on Online Learning. Association of Public and Land-grant Universities. Retrieved from https://login.ezproxy.etsu.edu:3443/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/864942179?accountid=10771
24.
Simonson,M., Smaldino,S., Albright,M., & Zvacek,S. (2006). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Summers,J., Waigandt,A., & Whittaker,T. (2005). A comparison of student achievement and satisfaction in an online versus a traditional face-to-face statistics class. Innovative Higher Education, 29(3), 233-250.
