Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article provides an overview of the planning and instructional delivery of a course in Applied Behavior Analysis using Adobe Connect Pro™. A description of software features used by course instructors is provided along with how each feature compares to resources found to deliver instruction in a traditional classroom setting. In addition, the article describes the results and implications from instructional delivery designed to increase student participation, correct responding, and levels of satisfaction with various features of the software. Outcome from instruction suggest high rates of student participation, correct student responding, and high levels of student satisfaction with the various features of Adobe Connect Pro™.

Keywords

Adobe Connect Pro™synchronous learning online instruction participation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adobe Systems Inc. (2011, December). Adobe Connect: Web conferencing solutions: eLearning solution benefits. Retrieved from http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobatconnectpro/elearning/benefits.html.

Ahern,

, & El-Hindi,

(2000). Improving the instructional congruency of a computer-mediated small-group discussion: A case study in design and delivery. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32 (3), 385-400.

Allen,

, Mabry,

, Bourhis,

, Tittsworth,

, & Burrell,

(2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning: A comparison using a meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 54, 402-420.

Beattie,

, Spooner,

, Jordan,

, Algozzine,

, & Spooner,

(2002). Evaluating instruction in distance learning classes. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25 (2), 124-132.

Bloom,

B.S.

(1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain (p. 149-150). New York, NY: Longmans, Green.

Boettcher,

J.V.

(2005). Designing for the virtual interactive classroom. Classroom Technology, 18 (9), 20-23.

Bonk,

C.J.

, & Wisher,

R.A.

(2000). Applying collaborative and e-learning tools to military distance learning: A research framework. (Technical report # 1107). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

Bower,

B.L.

, & Hardy,

K.P.

(2004). From correspondence to cyberspace: Changes and challenges in distance education. New Directions for Community Colleges, (128), 5-12.

Bradford,

, Porciello,

, Balkon,

, & Backus,

(2007). The Blackboard learning system: The be all and end all in educational instruction? Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35 (3), 301-314.

10.

Braun,

, & Clarke,

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77-101.

11.

Brownell,

M.T.

, Bishop,

A.M.

, & Sindelar,

P.T.

(2005). NCLB and the demand for highly qualified teachers: Challenges and solutions for rural schools. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24 (1), 9-15.

12.

Bullock,

L.M.

, Gable,

R.A.

, & Mohr,

J.D.

(2008). Technology-mediated instruction in distance education and teacher preparation in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 31, 229-242.

13.

Butner,

B.K.

, Smith,

A.B.

, & Murray,

(1999). Distance technology: A national study of graduate higher education programs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2 (3), 1-7.

14.

Canter,

, Voytecki,

K.S.

, & Rodríguez,

(2007). Increasing online interaction in rural special education teacher preparation programs. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 26 (1), 23-27.

15.

Carroll,

(1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733.

16.

Caywood,

, & Duckett,

(2003). Online vs. on-campus learning in teacher education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 26 (2), 98-105.

17.

Chen,

C.Y.

, Pedersen,

, & Murphy,

K.L.

(2011). Learners' perceived information overload in online learning via computer-mediated communication. Research in Learning Technology, 19 (2), 101-116. doi: 10.1080/21567069.2011.586678

18.

Chen,

, Ko,

, Kinshuk , & Lin,

(2005). A model for synchronous learning using the internet. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42 (2), 181-194.

19.

Collins,

B.C.

(1997). Training rural educators in Kentucky through distance learning: A model with follow-up data. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20, 234-248.

20.

Dammers,

R.J.

(2009). Utilizing internet-based videoconferencing for instrumental music lessons. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 28 (1), 17-24.

21.

Davidson-Shivers,

G. V.

, Muilenburg,

, & Tanner,

(2000). Synchronous and asynchronous discussion: What are the differences in student participation? Ed-Media 2000: World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

22.

Doherty-Sneddon,

, Anderson,

, O'Malley,

, Langton,

, Garrod,

, & Bruce,

(1997). Face-to-face and video-mediated communication: A comparison of dialogue structure and task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3 (2), 105-125. doi: 10.1037/1076-898x.3.2.105

23.

Dudding,

C.C.

(2009). Digital videoconferencing: Applications across the disciplines. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 30 (3), 178-182.

24.

Dymond,

S.K.

, Renzaglia,

, Halle,

J.W.

, Chadsey,

, & Bentz,

J.L.

(2008). An evaluation of videoconferencing as a supportive technology for practicum supervision. Teacher Education and Special Education, 31, 243-256.

25.

Falloon,

(2011). Making the connection: Moore's theory of transactional distance and its relevance to the use of a virtual classroom in postgraduate online teacher education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43 (3), 187-209.

26.

Feenberg,

(1989). A user's guide to the pragmatics of computer mediated communication. Semiotica, 75(3/4), 257-278.

27.

Fereday,

, & Muir-Cochrane,

(2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5 (1), 1-11.

28.

Fernandez,

M.L.

(2007). Communication and instruction in an online graduate education course. Teaching Education, 18 (2), 137-150.

29.

Finkelstein,

(2006). Learning in real time: Synchronous teaching and learning online. San Francisco, CA US: Jossey-Bass.

30.

Garrison,

D.R.

, Anderson,

, & Archer,

(2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15 (1), 7-23.

31.

Hager,

K.D.

(2011). Web conferencing with distant alternate certificate student teachers. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 30 (1), 49-55.

32.

Hahn,

, Lehman,

, & Dupras,

(2006): Going the extra mile: Supporting distance education at University of Alaska Fairbanks. Journal of Access Services, 4(1-2), 1-28.

33.

Hammer,

P.C.

, Hughes,

, McClure,

, Reeves,

, & Salgado,

(2005, December). Rural teacher recruitment and retention practices: A review of the research literature, National Survey of Rural Superintendents, and case studies of programs in Virginia. Nashville, TN: Edvantia, Inc.

34.

Herring,

S.C.

(2003). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In Barab

S. A.

, Kling

, & Gray

J. H.

, (Eds.). Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

35.

Hewitt,

(2005). Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14 (4), 567-589

36.

Hrastinski,

(2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning: A study of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning methods discovered that each supports different purposes. Educause Quarterly, 31 (4), 51-55.

37.

Jameson,

, & McDonnell,

(2007). Going the distance to train teachers for students with severe disabilities: The University of Utah distance teacher education program. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 26 (2), 26-32.

38.

Johnson,

L.R.

(2004). Research-based online course development for special education teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27 (3), 207-223.

39.

Kanuka,

, & Conrad,

(2003). The name of the game. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4 (4), 385-393.

40.

Karpova,

, Correia,

A.P.

, & Baran,

(2009). Learn to use and use to learn: Technology in virtual collaboration experience. The Internet and Higher Education, 12 (1), 45-52.

41.

Latchman,

H.A.

, & Salzmann,

C.H.

(1999). Information technology enhanced learning in distance and conventional education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 42 (4), 247.

42.

Ludlow,

B.L.

, Collins,

B.C.

, & Menlove,

R. R.

(Eds.) (2006). Online instruction for distance education delivery: Preparing special educators in and for rural areas. Monograph by the American Council on Rural Special Education. Canada: Trafford.

43.

Ludlow,

B.L.

, Conner,

, & Schechter,

(2005). Low incidence disabilities and personnel preparation for rural areas: Current status and future trends. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24 (3), 15-24.

44.

McBrien,

J.L.

, Jones,

, & Cheng,

(2009). Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10 (3), 1-6.

45.

McDonnell,

, Jameson,

, Riesen,

, Polychronis,

, Crockett,

M.A.

, & Brown,

B.E.

(2011). A comparison of on-campus and distance teacher education programs in severe disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34 (2), 106-11.

46.

McLeskey,

, Tyler,

, & Flippin,

(2004). The supply of and demand for special education teachers: A review of research regarding the chronic shortage of special education teachers. Journal of Special Education, 38 (1), 5-21.

47.

Ng,

K.C.

, (2007). Replacing face-to-face tutorials by synchronous online technologies: Challenges and pedagogical implications. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8 (1), 1-15.

48.

Park,

Y.J.

, & Bonk,

C.J.

(2007). Synchronous learning experiences: Distance and residential learners' perspectives in a blended graduate course. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6 (3), 245-264.

49.

Rao,

, Eady,

, & Edelen-Smith,

(2011). Creating virtual classrooms for rural and remote communities. Phi Delta Kappan, 92 (6), 22-27.

50.

Savenye,

W.C.

(2005). Improving online courses: What is interaction and why use it? Distance Learning, 2 (6), 22-29.

51.

Skylar,

A.A.

(2009). A comparison of asynchronous online text-based lectures and synchronous interactive web conferencing lectures. Issues in Teacher Education, 18 (2), 69-84.

52.

Waggoner,

M. D.

(Ed.). (1992). Empowering networks: Computer conferencing in education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

53.

Wasson,

(2007). Design and use of collaborative network learning scenarios: The DoCTA experience. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10 (4), 3-16.

54.

West,

, & Jones,

, (2007). A framework for planning technology used in teacher education programs that serve rural communities. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 26 (4), 3-15.

55.

Westling,

D.L.

, & Whitten,

T.M.

(1996). Rural special education teachers' plans to continue or leave their teaching positions. Exceptional Children, 62 (4), 319-333.

56.

Xin,

, (2002). Validity centered design for the domain of engaged collaborative discourse in computer conferencing (p. 2-3), Brigham Yong University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

57.

Yuping,

, Nian-Shing,

, & Levy,

(2010). Teacher training in a synchronous cyber face-to-face classroom: Characterizing and supporting the online teachers' learning process. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23 (4), 277-293. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2010.493523

Perceived Effectiveness of Web Conferencing Software in the Digital Environment to Deliver a Graduate Course in Applied Behavior Analysis

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References