While the basic tenets of the RtI model are well-established in the literature, few studies have been conducted to describe its implementation in rural schools. We conducted a qualitative study in three rural schools that had been designated as pilot sites by our state department of education. A cross-case analysis of the data collected through interviews, observations, and document reviews indicated positive changes, including (a) increased use of databased decision-making, (b) increased collaboration among general and special educators, (c) development of a common knowledge base around RtI, (d) re-definition of principals' roles, and (e) promising trends on statewide tests of reading achievement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AIMSweb (2008). Retrieved from www.aimsweb.com. Pearson Education, Inc.
2.
Batsche,G., Elliot,J., Graden, Grimes,J., Kovaleski,J., Prasse,D., Reschly,D., Schrag,J., & Tilly,W.D. (2006). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
3.
Bender,W.N., & Shores,C. (2007). Response to intervention: A practical guide for every teacher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
4.
Bergstrom,M.K. (2008). Professional development in response to intervention: Implementation of a model in a rural region.Rural Special Education Quarterly,27(4), 27-36.
5.
Bryant,D.P., Bryan,B.R., Gersten,R.M., Scammacca,N.N., Funk,C., Winter,A., Shih,M., & Pool,C. (2008). The effects of tier 2 intervention on the mathematics performance of first-grade students who are at-risk for mathematic difficulties.Learning Disabilities Quarterly,31(2), 47-63.
6.
Burns,M.K., & Senesac,B.V. (2005). Comparison of dual discrepancy criteria to assess response to intervention.Journal of Educational Psychology, 43, 393-406.
7.
Case,L.P., Speece,D.L., & Molloy,D.E. (2003). The validity of a response-to-instruction paradigm to identify reading disabilities: A longitudinal analysis of individual differences and contextual factors.School Psychology Review, 32, (4), 557-582.
8.
Catts,H.W., Petscher,Y., Schatschneider,C., Bridges,M.S., & Mendoza,K. (2009). Floor effects associated with universal screening and their impact on early identification.Journal of Learning Disabilities,42, 163-176.
9.
Coyne,M.D., Kame'enui,E. J., Simmons,D.C., & Harn,B.A. (2004). Beginning reading as inoculation or insulin: First-grade reading performance of strong responders to kindergarten intervention.Journal of Learning Disabilities,37(2), 90-104.
10.
Daly,E.J., Martens,B.K., Barnett,D., Witt,J.C., & Olsen,S.C. (2007). Varying intervention delivery in response to intervention: Confronting and resolving challenges with measurement, instruction, and intensity.School Psychology Review,36, 562-581.
11.
Dexter,D.D., Hughes,C.A., & Farmer,T.W. (2008). Responsiveness to intervention: A review of field studies and implications for rural special education.Rural Special Education Quarterly,27(4), 3-9.
12.
DuFour,R., & Eaker,R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
13.
Fixsen,D.L., Naoom,S.F., Blase,K.A., Friedman,R.M., & Wallace,F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network.
14.
Fuchs,L.S. (2003). Assessing intervention responsiveness: Conceptual and technical issues.Learning Disabilities Research and Practice,18(3), 172-187.
15.
Fuchs,D., & Deshler,D.D. (2007). What we need to know about responsiveness to intervention (and shouldn't be afraid to ask).Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,22, (2), 129-136.
16.
Fuchs,D., & Fuchs,L.S. (2005). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A blueprint for practitioners, policymakers, and parents.Teaching Exceptional Children,38, 57-61.
17.
Fuchs,D., Fuchs,L.S. & Compton,D.L. (2004). Indentifying reading disabilities by responsiveness-to-instruction: Specifying measures and criteria.Learning Disabilities Quarterly,27, 216-227.
18.
Fuchs,L.S., Fuchs,D., Compton,D.L., Bryant,J.D., Hamlett,C.L., & Seethaler,P.M. (2007). Mathematics screening and progress monitoring at first grade: Implications for responsiveness to intervention.Exceptional Children,73, 311-330.
Harry,B., & Klinger,J. (2007). Discarding the deficit model.Educational Leadership,64(5), 16-21.
21.
Hollenbeck,A.F. (2007). From IDEA to implementation: A discussion of foundational and future responsiveness-to-intervention research.Learning Disabilities Research and Practice22(2), 137-146.
22.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 2004. (2004). U.S.C. sec. 1400 et seq (2004).
23.
Jenkins,J.R., Hudson,R.F., & Johnson,E.S. (2007). Screening for at-risk readers in a response to intervention framework.School Psychology Review,36, 582-600.
24.
Johnson,E.S., & Smith,L. (2008). Implementation of response to interventions at middle school.Teaching Exceptional Children40(3), 46-52.
25.
Kame'enui,E. (2007). A new paradigm: Response to Intervention.Teaching Exceptional Children,39(5), 6-7.
26.
Kavale,K.A. (2005). Identifying specific learning disability: Is responsiveness to intervention the answer?Journal of Learning Disabilities,38(6), 553-562.
27.
Kovaleski,J.F. (2007). Response to intervention: Considerations of research and systems change.School Psychology Review, 638-646.
28.
Kratchowill,T.R., Volpiansky,P., Clements,M., & Ball,C. (2007). Professional development in implementing and sustaining multitier prevention models: Implications for responsiveness to intervention.School Psychology Review,36(4), 618-631.
29.
Kame'enui,E.J. (2007). A new paradigm.Teaching Exceptional Children,39(5), 6-7.
30.
McEneaney,J.E., Lose,M.K., & Schwartz,R.M. (2006) A transactional perspective on reading difficulties and response to intervention.Reading Research Quarterly,41(1), 117-128.
31.
McMaster,K.L., Fuchs,D., Fuchs,L.S., & Compton,D.L. (2005). Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods.Exceptional Children, 71(4), 445-463.
32.
Mesmer,E.M., & Mesmer,H.E. (2008). Response to intervention (RtI): What teachers of reading need to know.The Reading Teacher,62(4), 280-290.
Moustakas,C. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology, and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
O'Connor,R.E., Harty,K.R., & Fulmer,D. (2005). Tiers of intervention in kindergarten through third grade.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 532-538.
36.
Patton,M.Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Richards,C., Pavri,S., Golez,F.Canges,R., & Murphy,J. (2007). Response to intervention: Building the capacity of teachers to serve students with learning difficulties.Issues in Teacher Education,16(2), 55-65.
38.
Shinn,M.R. (2007). Identifying students at risk, monitoring performance, and determining eligibility within response to intervention: Research on educational need and benefit from academic intervention.School Psychology Review,36(4), 601-617.
39.
Stake,R.E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Stecker,P.M., Fuchs,D., & Fuchs,L.S. (2008). Progress monitoring as essential practice within response to intervention. Rural Special Education Quarterly,27(4), 10-17.
41.
Strauss,A.L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Vaughn,S., Linan-Thompson,S., & Hickman,P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities.Exceptional Children, 69(4), 391-409.
43.
Vaughn,S. & Fuchs,L.S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems.Learning Disabilities Research and Practice,18(3), 137-146.
44.
Walker-Dalhouse,D., Risko,V.J., Elsworthy,C., Grasley,E., Kaisler,G., McIlvain,D., & Stephan,M. (2009). Crossing boundaries and initiating conversations about RtI: Understanding and applying differentiated classroom instruction.The Reading Teacher,63, (1), 84-87.
45.
Yell,M.L., & Drasgow,E. (2007). Assessment for eligibility under IDEIA and the 2006 regulations.Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 202-213.
